[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-16 Thread Jakob Petsovits
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 Jakob Petsovits changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-16 Thread Oded Arbel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 Oded Arbel changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b |

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-16 Thread Oded Arbel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 --- Comment #14 from Oded Arbel --- (In reply to Natalie Clarius from comment #13) > > If the user wants to just inhibit the lid close action, then they should > > inhibit "handle-lid-switch". ... > > There is no user-facing setting for this though.

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-15 Thread Natalie Clarius
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 --- Comment #13 from Natalie Clarius --- I can't reproduce the comment described in the original post either. As for https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859#c2; sleep inhibitions not being respected on lid close would be a different issue and best

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-11 Thread Oded Arbel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 --- Comment #12 from Oded Arbel --- (In reply to Jakob Petsovits from comment #11) > In the meantime, it would be worth exploring whether setting a systemd > "sleep" and/or "idle" inhibitor should always keep a laptop from going to > sleep, or locking

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-10 Thread Jakob Petsovits
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 --- Comment #11 from Jakob Petsovits --- In the meantime, it would be worth exploring whether setting a systemd "sleep" and/or "idle" inhibitor should always keep a laptop from going to sleep, or locking the screen, respectively. Does a user expect

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-10 Thread Jakob Petsovits
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 --- Comment #10 from Jakob Petsovits --- Submitted https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/32196 for expanding inhibitor monitoring capabilities of the logind interface, hopefully this makes even remote sense to the systemd team. -- You are

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-10 Thread Jakob Petsovits
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 --- Comment #9 from Jakob Petsovits --- (In reply to Jakob Petsovits from comment #8) > (In reply to Jakob Petsovits from comment #7) > > Ah yes, you're right. Filtering out PowerDevil by "who" should do the trick. > > Thanks for the good thought, it

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-09 Thread Jakob Petsovits
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 --- Comment #8 from Jakob Petsovits --- (In reply to Jakob Petsovits from comment #7) > Ah yes, you're right. Filtering out PowerDevil by "who" should do the trick. > Thanks for the good thought, it looks like my brain isn't in top shape today > :P

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-09 Thread Jakob Petsovits
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 --- Comment #7 from Jakob Petsovits --- (In reply to Oded Arbel from comment #6) > (In reply to Jakob Petsovits from comment #5) > > I do think it's a bug that "handle-lid-switch" inhibitors don't do anything > > within a Plasma session. A proper

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-09 Thread Oded Arbel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 --- Comment #6 from Oded Arbel --- (In reply to Jakob Petsovits from comment #5) > I do think it's a bug that "handle-lid-switch" inhibitors don't do anything > within a Plasma session. A proper solution to this might involve some > investigation into

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-09 Thread Jakob Petsovits
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 --- Comment #5 from Jakob Petsovits --- I just realized that recognizing an inhibition for "handle-lid-switch" would not be possible with the current architecture, because PowerDevil sets the same inhibition by itself already. It's active all the time

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-04 Thread Oded Arbel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 --- Comment #4 from Oded Arbel --- I also cannot reproduce the problem with inhibiting "idle", on Plasma 6. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-04-03 Thread Jakob Petsovits
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 Jakob Petsovits changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jpe...@petsovits.com --- Comment #3 from

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-03-20 Thread Oded Arbel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 Oded Arbel changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |6.0.2 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-03-20 Thread Oded Arbel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 Oded Arbel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||o...@geek.co.il -- You are receiving this mail

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-03-20 Thread Oded Arbel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 --- Comment #2 from Oded Arbel --- I can still reproduce this issue on Plasma 6.0.2. I tested with sleeping on laptop lid close: 1. run `systemd-inhibit --what=idle:sleep:shutdown:handle-lid-switch --who=test --why=coz sleep 300` 2. close the laptop

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2024-03-20 Thread Oded Arbel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 Oded Arbel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timofeevsv1...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Oded

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2023-09-24 Thread Natalie Clarius
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 Natalie Clarius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||natalie_clar...@yahoo.de -- You are

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2023-07-27 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 auberg...@outlook.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||auberg...@outlook.com.au -- You are

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2023-03-05 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 bugs.kde.org-...@meurisse.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugs.kde.org-c69@meurisse.o

[Powerdevil] [Bug 457859] Powerdevil does not respect sleep inhibitors created with systemd-inhibit by unprivileged users

2022-08-15 Thread Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859 Nate Graham changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED CC|