Re: [Libreoffice] [LibreOffice] [PATCH] Minor libs-core comment clean up.

2010-10-20 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:40:32 -0400, Trevor Murphy trevor.m.mur...@gmail.com wrote: Incidentally, I'm running Ubuntu 10.04 with git-email installed via aptitude install, but I don't have the git-send-email command. Is there something obvious that I'm missing? I don't have git-send-email

Re: [Libreoffice] Building on gentoo ...

2010-10-20 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:45:11 +0200, René Kjellerup rk.katana.st...@gmail.com wrote: On the other matter unless you're still running kde 3 then you need --disable-kde else the config will fail when it can't find Qt 3.x On that matter can, we please --disable-kde by default. I don't know of

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] removed a lot of dead code and bogus comments

2010-10-20 Thread Noel Power
On 18/10/10 14:06, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: Hello, I've done some work on entry level tasks. Specifically, I've removed all #if 0 blocks in the LibreOffice source tree. Also, a lot of bogus comments like /*N*/, /*?*/ and so on were removed. As more than thousand of files have been changed

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] removed a lot of dead code and bogus comments

2010-10-20 Thread Noel Power
sending again :/ On 18/10/10 14:06, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: Hello, I've done some work on entry level tasks. Specifically, I've removed all #if 0 blocks in the LibreOffice source tree. Also, a lot of bogus comments like /*N*/, /*?*/ and so on were removed. As more than thousand of files

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] shutdownicon.cxx: rename getDotAutostart() - getAutostartDir()

2010-10-20 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
I was puzzled by the name and the new one is much clearer. Also add proper documentation to that function as to what it does and what the params mean. All callers have been adapted to the new name. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de --- sfx2/source/appl/shutdownicon.cxx | 16

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] shutdownicon.cxx: rename getDotAutostart() - getAutostartDir()

2010-10-20 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 13:11 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: I was puzzled by the name and the new one is much clearer. Also add proper documentation to that function as to what it does and what the params mean. All callers have been adapted to the new name. Look ok to me, committed + pushed.

Re: [Libreoffice] Building on windows 7-64bit with Visual Studio 2010 Express

2010-10-20 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 22:46 +0100, Martin Gallwey wrote: Okay! Most of the battle so far was figuring out what cygwin packages to install and how to get the correct cygdrive paths - can someone add a windows section to http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/LibreOffice/HowToBuild with the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for #i93300#: Crash when inserting 32 bit TIFF image

2010-10-20 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 20:25 +0300, Harri Pitkänen wrote: This patch has been tested on a 64 bit Linux system using the samples in the bug and some images from libtiff sample collection at ftp://ftp.remotesensing.org/pub/libtiff/pics-3.8.0.tar.gz I ran through this one, and yeah fixes a pile of

[Libreoffice] Address Books

2010-10-20 Thread Joseph Powers
It looks like someone already connected Base to Apple's Address Book (no bonus points for me) On my mac, I can't get the Mozilla Address Book driver to work. 1. Preferences - LibreOffice Base - Connections shows that com.sun.star.comp.sdbc.MozabDriver is installed. 2. Trying to open the

[Libreoffice] Problem w:/BASIC

2010-10-20 Thread Jean-Etienne SIX
Hello I'm testing libo beta2 + langpack fr under linux(slax) without jre get Erreur d'exécution BASIC message : the external file picker does not run works fine under windows happy if you can help ___ LibreOffice mailing list

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] bootstrap/soenv: remove tcsh version of LinuxX86-64Env.Set

2010-10-20 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
Previously we would have been writing out LinuxX86-64Env.Set and LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh which made my autocompletion useless. As we require bash anyway, it has been agreed on to just provide the bash version. Simplify the set_soenv.in to actually only produce 1 version. Signed-off-by: Sebastian

Re: [Libreoffice] Problem w:/BASIC

2010-10-20 Thread Noel Power
On 20/10/10 14:39, Jean-Etienne SIX wrote: Hello I'm testing libo beta2 + langpack fr under linux(slax) without jre get Erreur d'exécution BASIC message : the external file picker does not run works fine under windows happy if you can help what exact steps do you do? can you give some more

[Libreoffice] [Patch] SAL_N_ELEMENTS Easy Hack

2010-10-20 Thread Sean McMurray libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
From dff6ef1a53dd5f76ce9f33819106e860dd63a3e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:10:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Easy Hack for SAL_N_ELEMENTS This patch is public domain. --- reportdesign/source/ui/inspection/metadata.cxx |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2

[Libreoffice] Is there tag/property in the following example that LO not support yet?

2010-10-20 Thread Nadav Vinik
Hello I have docx document that LO failed load is images. The image can added to document, altough the XML code is defer. this is the part of the document.xml of the image. Do you know if it's because LO can't parse this part? (for any tag/property for example) I still investigate the

Re: [Libreoffice] Is there tag/property in the following example that LO not support yet?

2010-10-20 Thread Nadav Vinik
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Nadav Vinik em...@nadavvin.com wrote: Hello I have docx document that LO failed load is images. The image can added to document, altough the XML code is defer. this is the part of the document.xml of the image. Do you know if it's because LO can't parse

Re: [Libreoffice] Building on gentoo ...

2010-10-20 Thread René Kjellerup
As for disable it per default, look at another enable clause. But the quick glance at it tells me the then and else blocks needs to be reversed if test z$enable_kde != zyes; then orig else block else orig then block fi Hope it makes sense René On Oct 20, 2010 8:00 PM, Wols Lists

Re: [Libreoffice] how can we import/export .cbz/.cbr files on LibreOffice Impress?

2010-10-20 Thread Joop Kiefte
One feature in here (that I really liked about the newest powerpoint) is the ease to fill slides with just photo's. 2010/10/20 Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org: Paulo Silva wrote: A missing awesome feature on LibreOffice Impress would be the possibility on importing/exporting .cbz

Re: [Libreoffice] howto for getting non-trivial cppunit tests up and running

2010-10-20 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Caolan McNamara wrote: sc/qa/unit had an existing cppunit test to ensure that calc can do =SUM(A1:A2) correctly but it was currently disabled seeing as it didn't work, mostly due to miserable bootstrapping problems. I've fixed that test (I think), so I hope it can now provide a basis for

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Filters - Clean up comments in sw_unosett.cxx

2010-10-20 Thread jgraeme
A patch to clean up comments. Graeme From c16ca6be0594106268dc94646b1fc0724e924461 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: J. Graeme Lingard jgraeme+...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:27:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Clean up comments in sw_unosett.cxx ---

Re: [Libreoffice] Address Books

2010-10-20 Thread Joseph Powers
On Oct 20, 2010, at 8:05 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 06:09 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote: It looks like someone already connected Base to Apple's Address Book (no bonus points for me) On my mac, I can't get the Mozilla Address Book driver to work. Hmm, see

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove pam in writer sw

2010-10-20 Thread Nadav Vinik
remove pam in writer sw diff --git a/sw/source/filter/writer/writer.cxx b/sw/source/filter/writer/writer.cxx index db72a3c..708ab29 100644 --- a/sw/source/filter/writer/writer.cxx +++ b/sw/source/filter/writer/writer.cxx @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ #include editeng/fontitem.hxx #include

Re: [Libreoffice] ucb/source/ucb compilation error

2010-10-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
At 1:11am -0400 Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Kevin Hunter wrote: 3. Misinterpretation of __PRETTY_FUNCTION__? What is __PRETTY_FUNCTION__? It changed in GCC 3.4, I believe. Now, contrary to the implicit understanding from its all caps nature, it is *not* a