Christian Lohmaier wrote:
/* artwok */ is meant to not being merged.
I think this is a bad choice, as you will always need it when
building, and for the same reasons it is discussed not to be worthy to
be merged, I'm all in favor of merging it:
Seconded. That also makes cleaning up /
On Wed, 25 May 2011 15:07:05 +0200
Thorsten Behrens
t...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
/* artwok */ is meant to not being merged.
I think this is a bad choice, [...]
Seconded. That also makes cleaning up / moving stuff around much
easier.
I brought that up
Hi *,
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
[onegit]
I have put what I have come-up with so far on our Wiki
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/One_Git_Conversion
[...]
Comments and suggestion are welcomed on the 'Discussion Page'
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that our source is spread among 20 git repositories has been
a source of grief and quite a common complaint from people joining the
project.
Recently there ave been some tests conducted to see if having just
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Simos Xenitellis
simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
I got slightly different figures for the .git/ of each repository.
Instead of 1666MB total, I got 1350MB.
You may have to run 'git gc' on your repositories.
I got the 1350MB figure by testing with fresh
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Simos Xenitellis
simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
I got slightly different figures for the .git/ of each repository.
Instead of 1666MB total, I got 1350MB.
You may have to run 'git
The fact that our source is spread among 20 git repositories has been
a source of grief and quite a common complaint from people joining the
project.
Recently there ave been some tests conducted to see if having just one
big git repo would be viable from a performace stand-point.
Björn
