Re: [LincolnTalk] 15 Units per Acre - Part 2: Cold Brook Crossing - Sudbury/Concord on 117

de established pursuant to section 13 of chapter 21A.” >> This directive means that even though the zoning district must permit 15 >> units per acre as of right, any multi-family housing produced within the >> district is subject to, and must comply with, the state wetlands protectio

Re: [LincolnTalk] 15 Units per Acre - Part 2: Cold Brook Crossing - Sudbury/Concord on 117

to, and must comply with, the state wetlands protection > act and title 5 of the state environmental code—even if such compliance > means a proposed project will be less dense than 15 units per acre. > > > >> -- Forwarded message - >> From: Margaret Olson

Re: [LincolnTalk] 15 Units per Acre - Part 2: Cold Brook Crossing - Sudbury/Concord on 117

: Margaret Olson > Date: Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 2:59 PM > Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] 15 Units per Acre - Part 2: Cold Brook Crossing > - Sudbury/Concord on 117 > To: Robert Ahlert > Cc: Lincoln Talk > > > From the project narrative ( > https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.co

Re: [LincolnTalk] 15 Units per Acre - Part 2: Cold Brook Crossing - Sudbury/Concord on 117

You can go look at the sites! On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 3:46 PM Robert Ahlert wrote: > Those photos are misleading. When you show one individual building or > part of the building, it doesn't give the full picture of the density on > the site. The site plans do a much better job. Obviously we

Re: [LincolnTalk] 15 Units per Acre - Part 2: Cold Brook Crossing - Sudbury/Concord on 117

Those photos are misleading. When you show one individual building or part of the building, it doesn't give the full picture of the density on the site. The site plans do a much better job. Obviously we don't have those yet so I'm trying to help folks understand what 15 units / acre built on

Re: [LincolnTalk] 15 Units per Acre - Part 2: Cold Brook Crossing - Sudbury/Concord on 117

Thank you! It is just such site-specific visualization that I need. I expect it will help others too. Maybe it will assuage my anxiety. Certainly it will help better understand what we are taking about. -- Sara Mattes > On Oct 9, 2023, at 3:31 PM, Robert Ahlert wrote: > > Hi Sara -

Re: [LincolnTalk] 15 Units per Acre - Part 2: Cold Brook Crossing - Sudbury/Concord on 117

Hi Sara - I’m working on a 2-D scaled model (starting with the Codman road section) to answer your question. This should help to visualize what the footprint will be on the buildable acres there. Why didn’t we ask Utile to do this? Ran out of time? Money? Seems like we need more time for better

Re: [LincolnTalk] 15 Units per Acre - Part 2: Cold Brook Crossing - Sudbury/Concord on 117

I once again refer you to the photos in the Housing Choice Working Groups presentation: HCWG Slide Deck This illustrates the developments we currently have in town with a variety of densities on a

Re: [LincolnTalk] 15 Units per Acre - Part 2: Cold Brook Crossing - Sudbury/Concord on 117

Thank you, Margaret. So, that development is 5units more per acre than what we might have on Lewis St. and Codman Rd? And could those additional units be reflected in the height? What would the 15 units/acres look like on Codman Rd. and Lewis St, given our height restrictions? An

Re: [LincolnTalk] 15 Units per Acre - Part 2: Cold Brook Crossing - Sudbury/Concord on 117

>From the project narrative ( https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/cdn.sudbury.ma.us/wp-content/uploads/sites/326/2020/05/Cold-Brook-Crossing-Site-Plan-Narrative-March-11-2020.pdf?version=dd2e49a8d33cbe913460c6b7d51236c4 ): Of the 26 acres: 9.9 acres are in conservation 3.1 acres are part of the