when i expressed my concern about the high price after a half a year, your
representatives assured me that i would just have to call up and get a new
deal. they should have told me that i may not get a good deal if i use a lot of
bandwidth. do u really want customers for a half a year who then
I would like to add to the Static IP bonus that other ISP's such as
Netvision are now willing to give free of charge a Static IP to a business
account (which anyone can be pretty much).
-David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Yedidyah
I'll start off that I do not know the internals of the business model behind
how much ISP's make money and how, I can only speculate.
I agree with you about the Israeli customer and yet, at the same time,
different government regulations (handled by Bezeq) have been limiting us
from receiving
On Sep 26, 10:26, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
} Subject: Re: Actcom without a dailer costs more
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:13:24AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 25, 14:28, El-al, Netta wrote:
You also had a static IP. As far as I know the low prices of the
other ISPs don't
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:25:36PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 10:26, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
} Subject: Re: Actcom without a dailer costs more
3. Even though routers are tend to connect 24x7, yet with dynamic IPs
there is still a need for significantly less IPs.
Care to
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Galed Friedmann wrote:
I know that the DB files are being touched all the time and their last
modification time is being
changed, so maybe that is why rsync thinks the file has been changed,
but it still supposed to
transfer the deltas only ...
While you said it right,
Amir,
First, regardless of how satisfied the Linux-IL members are with your
answers, I would like to thank you for treating the matter seriously
enough to personally subscribe to this list and participating so
actively. I hope that as a compensation you are getting some useful
feedback from a
On Sep 26, 15:27, El-al, Netta wrote:
} Subject: RE: Actcom without a dailer costs more
look, i'm not accusing u of fraud or anything. i know what the written
agreement says. *but*, i am accusing u of misleading me. your representatives
basically implied (not promised) that i would be getting
On Monday 26 September 2005 12:06, El-al, Netta wrote:
so you think that customers should pay double prices to their favorite
businesses in order to keep them in business. that's not what capitalism
and competition is about. hey, if you're a little business and then a
bigger business starts
On Monday 26 September 2005 15:27, El-al, Netta wrote:
Hello,
Please stop posting the whole thread in your mail, it is uselessly long,
and against the list etiquette. Secondly, please stop using this list in your
piss fight against Actcom, as we're not your rant amplifiers. I think we
On Monday 26 September 2005 21:06, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
By the way, as quite a few others on this list I use my Internet
connection at home to connect to my employer's LAN over VPN. It was my
employer who insisted on a no-dialer setup because the protocols
dialers use (L2TP, PPTP) interfere
Ariel Biener [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What VPN do you have that is affected by the link layer ? I had no
problem using either PPTP or L2TP VPNs, or IPSEC VPNs from either
Cisco, Checkpoint and the free projects over either PPPoA or PPPoE,
with dialer and everything.
None of the above ;-)
Is anyone aware of the U3 platform (http://www.u3.com/), which is a
joint venture of M-Systems and SanDisk?
Turns out that the U3 specs are supposed to support running MS-Windows
2000 and MS-Windows XP applications on computers with MS-Windows
operating systems.
Is there any support for Linux
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 14:20:56 +0100, Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you intend to have the storage in one machine and view a movie on
another having 1Gbps network would help. It's not critical but it will help.
That is a gross exaggeration. The typical movie is just about 1Mbit/s
and
I would second that.
Check MPG compression rate, and you'll get the details as to the
transfer rate required.
1Gb/s is overkill for
home usage, especially when home computers still tend to be limited by
the PCI b/w, which enforces a sum of up to 133MB/s for all PCI
interfaces. It means that
On 9/27/05, Ehud Karni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 14:20:56 +0100, Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you intend to have the storage in one machine and view a movie on
another having 1Gbps network would help. It's not critical but it will help.
That is a gross
16 matches
Mail list logo
