On 10/24/13 5:13 PM, Bryan Baldwin wrote:
On 10/25/2013 05:32 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
snip
We know your argument. Seriously, We've heard it everywhere all the
time...end-less-ly. Everybody wishes that their software was robust with
magic documentation and free specialists that will fix your
On 10/24/13 12:55 PM, Richard Talley wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com
mailto:snowsh...@q.com wrote:
I can't speak for Rich, but it was not my intent to leave an
impression of mass exodus. Just my pulling back from the
potential promise I saw
On 10/24/13 8:32 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
24/10/2013 15:59, Ken Springer:
There is also the segment of the open source area where they actively
ask you to file bugs that can be fixed. Then the bugs just sit there,
never getting fixed. If you aren't going to actively fix the bugs, then
On 10/25/2013 01:29 PM, Ken Springer
wrote:
On
10/24/13 5:13 PM, Bryan Baldwin wrote:
On 10/25/2013 05:32 AM, Ken Springer
wrote:
snip
We know your argument. Seriously, We've heard it
On 10/24/13 1:27 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:32:55 -0600
Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com wrote:
Product support, customer service, in general, sucks. Online,
offline, commercial, open source, just about everywhere. For
software these days, you are supposed to join a forum. If
2013/10/24 Ken Springe
>
> Not professional ? Right, don't use it then.
>>
>
> Not sure how you feel, so no reply.
He's serious, and so am I: if you want "professional" software and think
LyX is not professional (or if it does not fit your needs for other
reasons), don't use it. Sine ira et
X package,
generalizes it to all Open Source (except LyX), and then somehow turns
that into "why people give up on open source software", as if there's
some kind of mass exodus from Open Source. How does THAT work? My
observation is that Open Source is gaining mindshare and usage pretty
much
You do seem to have very strong opinions about open-source, and demand very
high standards. Would you care to tell us how many open-source projects
have you created or at least been an active developer in?
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
> I do, but that's
Hi, Jürgen,
Interspersed reply...
On 10/24/13 1:01 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2013/10/24 Ken Springe
Not professional ? Right, don't use it then.
Not sure how you feel, so no reply.
He's serious, and so am I: if you want "professional" software and think
LyX is not
24/10/2013 15:59, Ken Springer:
There is also the segment of the open source area where they actively
ask you to file bugs that can be fixed. Then the bugs just sit there,
never getting fixed. If you aren't going to actively fix the bugs, then
don't ask for help in identifying those bugs.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
> Hi, Jürgen,
>
> Interspersed reply...
>
>
> On 10/24/13 1:01 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>
>> 2013/10/24 Ken Springe
>>
>> Not professional ? Right, don't use it then.
>>
>>
>> Not sure how you feel, so no
gress, therefore, depends on unreasonable people."
Another puzzler: someone has a problem with a single LaTeX package,
generalizes it to all Open Source (except LyX), and then somehow turns
that into "why people give up on open source software", as if there's
some kind of mass exo
On 24/10/2013 07:32, Richard Talley wrote:
> I've read good things about Scrivener. It's more a 'book project
> management' program than a word processor. I know some people use it for
> everything until it's time to print, then they export to LaTeX. Good
> luck with it.
A somewhat close analog
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
>
> I can't speak for Rich, but it was not my intent to leave an impression of
> "mass exodus". Just my pulling back from the potential promise I saw that
> open source has, but IMO is not doing a good job of meeting. I
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:32:55 -0600
Ken Springer wrote:
> Product support, customer service, in general, sucks. Online,
> offline, commercial, open source, just about everywhere. For
> software these days, you are supposed to join a forum. If I went
> back through all my forum
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Walter van Holst
wrote:
> On 24/10/2013 07:32, Richard Talley wrote:
>> I've read good things about Scrivener. It's more a 'book project
>> management' program than a word processor. I know some people use it for
>> everything until
On 25/10/2013 3:32 a.m., Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I cannot speak for other free (as in freedom) software, but the deal is
simple: programmers do what they can and scratch their own itches,
either because they need a feature or they want to implement it, and
users do what they want and
On 10/25/2013 05:32 AM, Ken Springer
wrote:
We know your argument. Seriously, We've heard it everywhere all the
time...end-less-ly. Everybody wishes that their software was robust
with magic documentation and free specialists that will fix your
On 10/24/13 9:03 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Ken Springer > wrote:
Hi, Jürgen,
Interspersed reply...
On 10/24/13 1:01 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2013/10/24 Ken Springe
I'm not a programmer, learned many years ago that is not for me. But I
did contribute, for free, to writing the help files of a commercial
program for a platform now long gone.
But, as I wrote in news://news.gmane.org:119/l4bi37$vh$1...@ger.gmane.org,
if I help by reporting bugs I find in a
On 10/24/13 11:35 AM, Walter van Holst wrote:
On 24/10/2013 07:32, Richard Talley wrote:
I've read good things about Scrivener. It's more a 'book project
management' program than a word processor. I know some people use it for
everything until it's time to print, then they export to LaTeX. Good
On 10/24/13 5:13 PM, Bryan Baldwin wrote:
On 10/25/2013 05:32 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
We know your argument. Seriously, We've heard it everywhere all the
time...end-less-ly. Everybody wishes that their software was robust with
magic documentation and free specialists that will fix your
On 10/24/13 12:55 PM, Richard Talley wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Ken Springer > wrote:
I can't speak for Rich, but it was not my intent to leave an
impression of "mass exodus". Just my pulling back from the
potential promise
On 10/24/13 8:32 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
24/10/2013 15:59, Ken Springer:
There is also the segment of the open source area where they actively
ask you to file bugs that can be fixed. Then the bugs just sit there,
never getting fixed. If you aren't going to actively fix the bugs, then
On 10/25/2013 01:29 PM, Ken Springer
wrote:
On
10/24/13 5:13 PM, Bryan Baldwin wrote:
On 10/25/2013 05:32 AM, Ken Springer
wrote:
We know your argument. Seriously, We've heard it everywhere
On 10/24/13 1:27 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:32:55 -0600
Ken Springer wrote:
Product support, customer service, in general, sucks. Online,
offline, commercial, open source, just about everywhere. For
software these days, you are supposed to join a forum.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.comwrote:
I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some technical
manuals quickly that looked good to management and that didn't make me deal
with the WYSIWYG nightmares of Word and its ilk.
LyX really came
Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com írta:
I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some technical
manuals quickly that looked good to management and that didn#39;t make me
deal with the WYSIWYG nightmares of Word and its ilk.
LyX really came through for me.
Now I#39;m helping a
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:19:38 -0600
Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote:
Now on to the résumé. Let's see what's available. ModernCV looks good,
under development for seven years.
Richard,
That's what I thought too. The documentation is, as you point out,
rather sketchy. But with a
On 10/22/13 10:19 PM, Richard Talley wrote:
I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some technical
manuals quickly that looked good to management and that didn't make me
deal with the WYSIWYG nightmares of Word and its ilk.
LyX really came through for me.
Now I'm helping a
You do understand that a lot of open-source software, including LyX, is
developed by *volunteers*, do you?
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com wrote:
On 10/22/13 10:19 PM, Richard Talley wrote:
I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some
On 10/23/2013 12:33 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
The program I filed the bugs with is one that wishes to take on a
commercial program in the marketplace. And they add new features,
some of which are inevitable buggy. But the attitude exhibited by not
fixing existing bugs is very unprofessional.
I do, but that's no excuse for being nonprofessional in what you are
trying to do. Adding features while ignoring bugs is nonprofessional.
I do have some free software installed, some open source, some not.
But I get updates and bug fixes from the free software, not so much
from the open
On 10/23/13 11:24 AM, David L. Johnson wrote:
On 10/23/2013 12:33 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
The program I filed the bugs with is one that wishes to take on a
commercial program in the marketplace. And they add new features,
some of which are inevitable buggy. But the attitude exhibited by not
Ken Springer schreef op 23-10-2013 19:41:
I do, but that's no excuse for being nonprofessional in what you are
trying to do. Adding features while ignoring bugs is nonprofessional.
Not professional ? Right, don't use it then.
Vincent
Interesting comments. I too have found small vendors to be much more
helpful. Often the developers help with or even do all of the tech support
at small vendors. And they actually read my emails, instead of replying
with canned responses.
My experience with LyX has been mostly excellent. I
On 10/23/13 12:42 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Ken Springer schreef op 23-10-2013 19:41:
I do, but that's no excuse for being nonprofessional in what you are
trying to do. Adding features while ignoring bugs is nonprofessional.
Not professional ? Right, don't use it then.
Not sure how
On 10/23/13 10:34 AM, Les Denham wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:19:38 -0600
Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote:
Now on to the résumé. Let's see what's available. ModernCV looks good,
under development for seven years.
Richard,
That's what I thought too. The documentation is, as you
On 10/23/13 2:31 PM, Richard Talley wrote:
Interesting comments. I too have found small vendors to be much more
helpful. Often the developers help with or even do all of the tech
support at small vendors. And they actually read my emails, instead of
replying with canned responses.
Most of the
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com wrote:
LyX looks to be rather out of the box from you basic office suite
thinking, and I want to get that under control before getting into any
tweaking.
As you get started with LyX resist the temptation to 'finger paint'.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.comwrote:
I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some technical
manuals quickly that looked good to management and that didn't make me deal
with the WYSIWYG nightmares of Word and its ilk.
LyX really came
Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com írta:
I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some technical
manuals quickly that looked good to management and that didn#39;t make me
deal with the WYSIWYG nightmares of Word and its ilk.
LyX really came through for me.
Now I#39;m helping a
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:19:38 -0600
Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote:
Now on to the résumé. Let's see what's available. ModernCV looks good,
under development for seven years.
Richard,
That's what I thought too. The documentation is, as you point out,
rather sketchy. But with a
On 10/22/13 10:19 PM, Richard Talley wrote:
I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some technical
manuals quickly that looked good to management and that didn't make me
deal with the WYSIWYG nightmares of Word and its ilk.
LyX really came through for me.
Now I'm helping a
You do understand that a lot of open-source software, including LyX, is
developed by *volunteers*, do you?
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com wrote:
On 10/22/13 10:19 PM, Richard Talley wrote:
I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some
On 10/23/2013 12:33 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
The program I filed the bugs with is one that wishes to take on a
commercial program in the marketplace. And they add new features,
some of which are inevitable buggy. But the attitude exhibited by not
fixing existing bugs is very unprofessional.
I do, but that's no excuse for being nonprofessional in what you are
trying to do. Adding features while ignoring bugs is nonprofessional.
I do have some free software installed, some open source, some not.
But I get updates and bug fixes from the free software, not so much
from the open
On 10/23/13 11:24 AM, David L. Johnson wrote:
On 10/23/2013 12:33 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
The program I filed the bugs with is one that wishes to take on a
commercial program in the marketplace. And they add new features,
some of which are inevitable buggy. But the attitude exhibited by not
Ken Springer schreef op 23-10-2013 19:41:
I do, but that's no excuse for being nonprofessional in what you are
trying to do. Adding features while ignoring bugs is nonprofessional.
Not professional ? Right, don't use it then.
Vincent
Interesting comments. I too have found small vendors to be much more
helpful. Often the developers help with or even do all of the tech support
at small vendors. And they actually read my emails, instead of replying
with canned responses.
My experience with LyX has been mostly excellent. I
On 10/23/13 12:42 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Ken Springer schreef op 23-10-2013 19:41:
I do, but that's no excuse for being nonprofessional in what you are
trying to do. Adding features while ignoring bugs is nonprofessional.
Not professional ? Right, don't use it then.
Not sure how
On 10/23/13 10:34 AM, Les Denham wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:19:38 -0600
Richard Talley rich.tal...@gmail.com wrote:
Now on to the résumé. Let's see what's available. ModernCV looks good,
under development for seven years.
Richard,
That's what I thought too. The documentation is, as you
On 10/23/13 2:31 PM, Richard Talley wrote:
Interesting comments. I too have found small vendors to be much more
helpful. Often the developers help with or even do all of the tech
support at small vendors. And they actually read my emails, instead of
replying with canned responses.
Most of the
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Ken Springer snowsh...@q.com wrote:
LyX looks to be rather out of the box from you basic office suite
thinking, and I want to get that under control before getting into any
tweaking.
As you get started with LyX resist the temptation to 'finger paint'.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Richard Talley wrote:
> I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some technical
> manuals quickly that looked good to management and that didn't make me deal
> with the WYSIWYG nightmares of Word and its ilk.
>
> LyX really
Richard Talley írta:
>I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some technical
>manuals quickly that looked good to management and that didnt make me
>deal with the WYSIWYG nightmares of Word and its ilk.
>LyX really came through for me.
>Now Im helping a
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:19:38 -0600
Richard Talley wrote:
> Now on to the résumé. Let's see what's available. ModernCV looks good,
> under development for seven years.
Richard,
That's what I thought too. The documentation is, as you point out,
rather sketchy. But with a
On 10/22/13 10:19 PM, Richard Talley wrote:
I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some technical
manuals quickly that looked good to management and that didn't make me
deal with the WYSIWYG nightmares of Word and its ilk.
LyX really came through for me.
Now I'm helping a
You do understand that a lot of open-source software, including LyX, is
developed by *volunteers*, do you?
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
> On 10/22/13 10:19 PM, Richard Talley wrote:
>
>> I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some
On 10/23/2013 12:33 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
The program I filed the bugs with is one that wishes to take on a
commercial program in the marketplace. And they add new features,
some of which are inevitable buggy. But the attitude exhibited by not
fixing existing bugs is very unprofessional.
I do, but that's no excuse for being nonprofessional in what you are
trying to do. Adding features while ignoring bugs is nonprofessional.
I do have some "free" software installed, some open source, some not.
But I get updates and bug fixes from the "free" software, not so much
from the open
On 10/23/13 11:24 AM, David L. Johnson wrote:
On 10/23/2013 12:33 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
The program I filed the bugs with is one that wishes to take on a
commercial program in the marketplace. And they add new features,
some of which are inevitable buggy. But the attitude exhibited by not
Ken Springer schreef op 23-10-2013 19:41:
I do, but that's no excuse for being nonprofessional in what you are
trying to do. Adding features while ignoring bugs is nonprofessional.
Not professional ? Right, don't use it then.
Vincent
Interesting comments. I too have found small vendors to be much more
helpful. Often the developers help with or even do all of the tech support
at small vendors. And they actually read my emails, instead of replying
with canned responses.
My experience with LyX has been mostly excellent. I
On 10/23/13 12:42 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Ken Springer schreef op 23-10-2013 19:41:
I do, but that's no excuse for being nonprofessional in what you are
trying to do. Adding features while ignoring bugs is nonprofessional.
Not professional ? Right, don't use it then.
Not sure how
On 10/23/13 10:34 AM, Les Denham wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 22:19:38 -0600
Richard Talley wrote:
Now on to the résumé. Let's see what's available. ModernCV looks good,
under development for seven years.
Richard,
That's what I thought too. The documentation is, as you
On 10/23/13 2:31 PM, Richard Talley wrote:
Interesting comments. I too have found small vendors to be much more
helpful. Often the developers help with or even do all of the tech
support at small vendors. And they actually read my emails, instead of
replying with canned responses.
Most of the
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
>
>
> LyX looks to be rather out of the box from you basic office suite
> thinking, and I want to get that under control before getting into any
> tweaking.
>
As you get started with LyX resist the temptation to 'finger
I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some technical
manuals quickly that looked good to management and that didn't make me deal
with the WYSIWYG nightmares of Word and its ilk.
LyX really came through for me.
Now I'm helping a friend apply to graduate school. I used the
I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some technical
manuals quickly that looked good to management and that didn't make me deal
with the WYSIWYG nightmares of Word and its ilk.
LyX really came through for me.
Now I'm helping a friend apply to graduate school. I used the
I originally picked up on LyX because I needed to produce some technical
manuals quickly that looked good to management and that didn't make me deal
with the WYSIWYG nightmares of Word and its ilk.
LyX really came through for me.
Now I'm helping a friend apply to graduate school. I used the
101 - 171 of 171 matches
Mail list logo