[Gluster-Maintainers] Announcing Gluster release 6.1

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 6.1 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: None Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages for 6.1:

[Gluster-Maintainers] Announcing Gluster release 5.6

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 5.6 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: - Release 5.x had a long standing issue where network bandwidth usage was

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-6.1 released

On 4/18/19 3:40 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 06:30:46PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >> SRC: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/86/artifact/glusterfs-6.1.tar.gz >> HASH: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/86/artifact/glusterfs-6.1.sha512sum >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.6 released

On 4/11/19 9:57 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 4/9/19 9:37 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 11:56:31AM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >>> SRC: >>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/85/artifact/glusterfs-5.6.tar.gz >>> HASH

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 6.1: Tagged!

Is now tagged and being packaged. If anyone gets a chance, please test the packages from CentOS SIG, as I am unavailable for the next 4 days. Thanks, Shyam On 4/16/19 9:53 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Status: Tagging pending > > Waiting on patches: > (Kotresh/Atin) - glusterd:

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] Requesting for an early 5.6 release

On 4/11/19 9:58 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > Am 08.04.2019 um 16:04 schrieb Shyam Ranganathan: >> On 4/6/19 1:47 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We had a critical bug [1], that got introduced in gluster release 5. >>> There ar

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.6 released

On 4/9/19 9:37 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 11:56:31AM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >> SRC: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/85/artifact/glusterfs-5.6.tar.gz >> HASH: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/85/artifact/glusterfs-5.6.sha512sum > >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Requesting for an early 5.6 release

On 4/6/19 1:47 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: > Hi, > > We had a critical bug [1], that got introduced in gluster release 5. > There are users waiting on an update with the fix. Hence requesting for > an out of band release for 5.6. Myself and jiffin, volunteer to do some > tasks of the

[Gluster-Maintainers] Announcing Gluster release 4.1.8

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.1.8 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Major changes, features and limitations addressed in this release: None Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages for 4.1.8:

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.1.8 released

On 3/28/19 8:05 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:12:28PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >> SRC: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/84/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.8.tar.gz >> HASH: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/84/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.8.sha512sum

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-6.0 released

On 3/21/19 3:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > glusterfs-6.0 packages for: > > * CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing at [1]. Please try > them out and report test results on this list. After someone reports > that they have tested them then they will be tagged for release. Tested the

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.5 released

e, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:58 AM Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing. > > Please try them out and report test results on this l

[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 6: Tagged and ready for packaging

Hi, RC1 testing is complete and blockers have been addressed. The release is now tagged for a final round of packaging and package testing before release. Thanks for testing out the RC builds and reporting issues that needed to be addressed. As packaging and final package testing is finishing

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.5 released

On 3/16/19 2:03 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing. > Please try them out and report test results on this list. > >   # yum install centos-release-gluster >   # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server The buildlogs

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.4 released

On 3/13/19 10:44 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 3/13/19 9:09 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: >> The v5.4 tag was made and a release job was run which gave us >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz. >> If the v5.4 tag is moved then there's

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.4 released

We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout > v5.4' points to the correct commit? > > On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, > mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Niels, Kaleb,

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.4 released

out as usual. NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing content. Thanks, Shyam On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 2/27/1

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 6: Release date update

On 3/5/19 1:17 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > Release-6 was to be an early March release, and due to finding bugs > while performing upgrade testing, is now expected in the week of 18th > March, 2019. > > RC1 builds are expected this week, to contain the required fix

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-users] Release 6: Release date update

wrote: > I just found a fix for > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674412. Since its a > deadlock I am wondering whether this should be in 6.0. What do you think? > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:47 PM Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > &

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

On 3/4/19 12:33 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 3/4/19 10:08 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 20:33, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan >> mailto:atumb...@redhat.com>> wrote: >> >> Thanks to those who participated. >> >

[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 6: Release date update

Hi, Release-6 was to be an early March release, and due to finding bugs while performing upgrade testing, is now expected in the week of 18th March, 2019. RC1 builds are expected this week, to contain the required fixes, next week would be testing our RC1 for release fitness before the release.

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.4 released

On 3/5/19 10:10 AM, Sanju Rakonde wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:29 PM Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +, > jenk.

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.4 released

On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >> SRC: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz >> HASH: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

On 3/4/19 10:08 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 20:33, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan > mailto:atumb...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Thanks to those who participated. > > Update at present: > > We found 3 blocker bugs in upgrade scenarios, and hence have marked >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Various upgrades are Broken

On 3/4/19 8:09 AM, Hari Gowtham wrote: > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:18 PM Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> >> On 3/4/19 7:29 AM, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: >>> Thanks for testing this Hari. >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:42 PM Hari Gowtham >> <

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Various upgrades are Broken

On 3/4/19 7:29 AM, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > Thanks for testing this Hari. > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:42 PM Hari Gowtham > wrote: > > Hi, > > With the patch https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21838/ the > upgrade from 3.12 to 6, 4.1

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5.4: Earlier than Mar-10th

d > attached to the release tracker, otherwise we'll regress! > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:00 PM Milind Changire <mailto:mchan...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 8:26 PM Shyam Ranganathan > mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > &g

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5.4: Earlier than Mar-10th

Du/Milind/Nithya? 3) Title: flooding of "dict is NULL" logging & crash of client process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671603 Still in NEW state, Du/Amar, do we have a date for resolution? Thanks, Shyam On 2/18/19 10:13 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > We have mo

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-6.0rc0 released

Hi, Release-6 RC0 packages are built (see mail below). This is a good time to start testing the release bits, and reporting any issues on bugzilla. Do post on the lists any testing done and feedback from the same. We have about 2 weeks to GA of release-6 barring any major blockers uncovered

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 6: Branched and next steps

On 2/20/19 7:45 AM, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:37 AM Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > In preparation for RC0 I have put up an intial patch for the release > notes [1]. Request the following

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 6: Branched and next steps

used in the brick process" and the actual status of the same in the notes RC0 build target would be tomorrow or by Wednesday. Thanks, Shyam [1] Release notes patch: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/6 On 2/5/19 8:25 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > Release 6 is br

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5.4: Earlier than Mar-10th

/13/19 4:09 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:24 PM Nithya Balachandran <mailto:nbala...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Adding Raghavendra G and Milind who are working on the patches so > they can update on when they should be ready. &g

[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5.4: Earlier than Mar-10th

Hi, There have been several crashes and issues reported by users on the latest 5.3 release. Around 10 patches have been merged since 5.3 and we have a few more addressing the blockers against 5.4 [1]. The original date was March 10th, but we would like to accelerate a 5.4 release to earlier this

[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 6: Branched and next steps

Hi, Release 6 is branched, and tracker bug for 6.0 is created [1]. Do mark blockers for the release against [1]. As of now we are only tracking [2] "core: implement a global thread pool " for a backport as a feature into the release. We expect to create RC0 tag and builds for upgrade and other

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 6: Kick off!

nging this to notice. > > Thanks, > Soumya > > [1] https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21734/ > > > On 1/23/19 8:43 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> On 1/23/19 6:03 AM, Ashish Pandey wrote: >>> >>> Following is the patch I am working and targeti

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 6: Kick off!

On 1/23/19 6:03 AM, Ashish Pandey wrote: > > Following is the patch I am working and targeting -  > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21933/ This is a bug fix, and the patch size at the moment is also small in lines changed. Hence, even if it misses branching the fix can be backported.

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 6: Kick off!

On 1/23/19 5:52 AM, RAFI KC wrote: > There are three patches that I'm working for Gluster-6. > > [1] : https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22075/ We discussed mux for shd in the maintainers meeting, and decided that this would be for the next release, as the patchset is not ready

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 6: Kick off!

On 12/6/18 9:34 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 11/6/18 11:34 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> ## Schedule > > We have decided to postpone release-6 by a month, to accommodate for > late enhancements and the drive towards getting what is required for the > GCS project [1] d

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.3 released

On 1/17/19 11:09 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 08:48:16PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >> SRC: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/77/artifact/glusterfs-5.3.tar.gz >> HASH: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/77/artifact/glusterfs-5.3.sha512sum >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-4.1.7 released

On 1/17/19 11:08 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 08:49:38PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >> SRC: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/78/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.7.tar.gz >> HASH: >>

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.2 released

On 12/13/18 6:05 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 02:42:17AM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >> SRC: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/76/artifact/glusterfs-5.2.tar.gz >> HASH: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/76/artifact/glusterfs-5.2.sha512sum >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 6: Kick off!

On 11/6/18 11:34 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > ## Schedule We have decided to postpone release-6 by a month, to accommodate for late enhancements and the drive towards getting what is required for the GCS project [1] done in core glusterfs. This puts the (modified) schedule for Releas

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.1 released

(top posting) As Kaleb pointed out, packages for 5.1 are present in the CentOS mirrors, I went ahead and created my own repo file to test the package contents. Packages for 5.1 worked fine and can be tagged for release in the Storage SIG. Thanks, Shyam On 11/14/18 3:52 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.1.6 released

On 11/15/2018 05:53 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 06:00:57PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >> SRC: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/74/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.6.tar.gz >> HASH: >>

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Fwd: Bug#913677: glusterfs-client: Hard link limit?

Are they hitting the setting introduced in 4.0 that limits the # of hardlinks per file? [1] To check if that is true, the brick logs should contain the log message [2] when they hit this option induced limit. Also, inspection of "Links" output for the file in question would help determine how

[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 4.1.7 & 5.2

Hi, As 4.1.6 and 5.1 are now tagged and off to packaging, announcing the tracker and dates for the next minor versions of these stable releases. 4.1.7: - Tracker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-4.1.7 - Deadline for fixes: 2019-01-21 5.2: - Tracker:

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Bug state change proposal based on the conversation on bz 1630368

On 11/06/2018 12:22 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 11/06/2018 10:27 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> On 11/6/18 9:27 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> Here is the way I see it, >>> - If you find a bug on master and want to know if it is >>> present/applicable

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Bug state change proposal based on the conversation on bz 1630368

On 11/06/2018 10:27 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 11/6/18 9:27 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> Here is the way I see it, >> - If you find a bug on master and want to know if it is >> present/applicable for a release, you chase it's clone against the release >> -

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Bug state change proposal based on the conversation on bz 1630368

On 11/06/2018 11:44 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 19:57, Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 11/06/2018 09:20 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 7:

[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 6: Kick off!

Hi, With release-5 out of the door, it is time to start some activities for release-6. ## Scope It is time to collect and determine scope for the release, so as usual, please send in features/enhancements that you are working towards reaching maturity for this release to the devel list, and

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Bug state change proposal based on the conversation on bz 1630368

On 11/06/2018 09:20 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 7:16 PM Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 11/05/2018 07:00 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > Bit late to this, but I’m in favour of the proposal. > &

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Bug state change proposal based on the conversation on bz 1630368

On 11/05/2018 07:00 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Bit late to this, but I’m in favour of the proposal. > > The script change should only consider transitioning the bug status from > POST to CLOSED NEXTRELEASE on master branch only. What’d be also ideal > is to update the fixed in version in which

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Bug state change proposal based on the conversation on bz 1630368

On 11/05/2018 09:43 AM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 4:28 PM Niels de Vos > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 05:31:26PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > hi, > >     When we create a bz on master and clone it to the next >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: GA tomorrow!

On 10/17/2018 07:47 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 10/15/2018 02:29 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> On 10/11/2018 11:25 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> So we are through with a series of checks and tasks on release-5 (like >>> ensuring all backports to other branche

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.0 released

On 10/19/2018 05:01 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 02:14:42PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >> SRC: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/73/artifact/glusterfs-5.0.tar.gz >> HASH: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/73/artifact/glusterfs-5.0.sha512sum

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: GA Tagged and release tarball generated

GA tagging done and release tarball is generated. 5.1 release tracker is now open for blockers against the same: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-5.1 5.x minor release is set to release on the 10th of every month, jFYI (as the release schedule page in the website is

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: GA tomorrow!

On 10/15/2018 02:29 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 10/11/2018 11:25 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> So we are through with a series of checks and tasks on release-5 (like >> ensuring all backports to other branches are present in 5, upgrade >> testing, basic performance tes

[Gluster-Maintainers] Fwd: [Gluster-users] Announcing Glusterfs release 3.12.15 (Long Term Maintenance)

Term Maintenance) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:18:25 -0400 From: Shyam Ranganathan To: Dmitry Melekhov , gluster-us...@gluster.org On 10/17/2018 12:21 AM, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: > #1637989 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1637989>: data-self-heal in > arbiter volume results in stale locks. &

[Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS Project Update - Week 1&2 of Oct

This is a once in 2 weeks update on activities around glusterfs project [1]. This is intended to provide the community with updates on progress around key initiatives and also to reiterate current goals that the project is working towards. This is intended to help contributors to pick and address

[Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainer meeting minutes : 15th Oct, 2018

### BJ Link * Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/217609845 * Watch: ### Attendance * Nigel, Nithya, Deepshikha, Akarsha, Kaleb, Shyam, Sunny ### Agenda * AI from previous meeting: - Glusto-Test completion on release-5 branch - On Glusto team - Vijay will take this on. - He will be

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: GA and what are we waiting on

On 10/11/2018 11:25 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > 1) Fix for libgfapi-python related blocker on Gluster: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1630804 @du @krutika, the root cause for the above issue is from the commit, commit c9bde3021202f1d5c5a2d19ac05a510fc1f788ac

[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: GA and what are we waiting on

So we are through with a series of checks and tasks on release-5 (like ensuring all backports to other branches are present in 5, upgrade testing, basic performance testing, Package testing, etc.), but still need the following resolved else we stand to delay the release GA tagging, which I hope to

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Missing option documentation (need inputs)

On 10/10/2018 11:20 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 20:30, Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > The following options were added post 4.1 and are part of 5.0 as the > first release for the same. They we

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Branched and further dates

On 09/26/2018 10:21 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > 3. Upgrade testing > - Need *volunteers* to do the upgrade testing as stated in the 4.1 > upgrade guide [3] to note any differences or changes to the same > - Explicit call out on *disperse* volumes, as we continue to state >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.0rc1 released

On 10/10/2018 03:58 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:04:41PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> On 10/5/18 12:44 PM, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >>> SRC: >>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/71/artifact/glusterfs-5.0rc1.tar.gz >>> HASH: >>>

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Missing option documentation (need inputs)

The following options were added post 4.1 and are part of 5.0 as the first release for the same. They were added in as part of bugs, and hence looking at github issues to track them as enhancements did not catch the same. We need to document it in the release notes (and also the gluster doc. site

[Gluster-Maintainers] Last minor release for 3.12?

Hi, 3.12 goes EOL with release-5, which is in about a week as most things are settled at present. We have the following open patches against 3.12: https://review.gluster.org/q/project:glusterfs+branch:release-3.12+status:open My thinking is that we do a final bug fix release for 3.12 (as the

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: Branched and further dates

On 10/05/2018 10:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 10/04/2018 11:33 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> On 09/13/2018 11:10 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> RC1 would be around 24th of Sep. with final release tagging around 1st >>> of Oct. >> RC1 now stands t

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: Branched and further dates

On 10/05/2018 11:04 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > > 3) Release notes review and updates with GD2 content pending > > > > @Kaushal/GD2 team can we get the updates as required? > > https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/21303 > > Still awaiting this. > > > Kaushal has

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: Branched and further dates

On 10/04/2018 11:33 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 09/13/2018 11:10 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> RC1 would be around 24th of Sep. with final release tagging around 1st >> of Oct. > > RC1 now stands to be tagged tomorrow, and patches that are being > targeted for

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: Branched and further dates

On 10/04/2018 02:46 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote: > 2) Py3 corrections in master > > @Kotresh are all changes made to master backported to release-5 (may not > be merged, but looking at if they are backported and ready for merge)? > > > All changes made to master are

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: Branched and further dates

On 10/04/2018 12:01 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > 4) This bug [2] was filed when we released 4.0. > > The issue has not bitten us in 4.0 or in 4.1 (yet!) (i.e the options > missing and hence post-upgrade clients failing the mount). This is > possibly the last chance to fix it. > >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: Branched and further dates

On 09/13/2018 11:10 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > RC1 would be around 24th of Sep. with final release tagging around 1st > of Oct. RC1 now stands to be tagged tomorrow, and patches that are being targeted for a back port include, 1) https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/21314 (sn

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Lock down period merge process

On 10/03/2018 11:32 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:50 PM Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 10/03/2018 11:16 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > >     Once we have distributed te

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Lock down period merge process

On 10/03/2018 11:16 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > Once we have distributed tests running, such that overall regression > time is reduced, we can possibly tackle removing retries for tests, and > then getting to a more stringent recheck process/tooling. The reason > being, we

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Lock down period merge process

On 10/03/2018 05:36 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 8:18 PM Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 09/27/2018 10:05 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > >         Now does this mean we block comm

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Branched and further dates

On 09/26/2018 10:21 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > 1. Release notes (Owner: release owner (myself), will send out an > initial version for review and to solicit inputs today) Please find the initial commit here [1]. @Kaushal/GD2 team, request updation of the Management section with re

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [for discussion] suggestions around improvements in bug triage workflow

On 09/27/2018 11:33 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 at 20:37, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay > > wrote: > > The origin of this conversation is a bit of a hall-way discussion with > Shyam. The actual matter should be familiar to

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: Performance comparisons

On 09/26/2018 10:21 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > 4. Performance testing/benchmarking > - I would be using smallfile and FIO to baseline 3.12 and 4.1 and test > RC0 for any major regressions > - If we already know of any please shout out so that we are aware of > the proble

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-5.0rc0 released

On 09/25/2018 05:36 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:55:46AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> On 09/17/2018 08:44 PM, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >>> SRC: >>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/69/artifact/glusterfs-5.0rc0.tar.gz >>> HASH: >>>

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Memory overwrites due to processing vol files???

y Shyam > should fix the crash. [1] > https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21299/ > > But, I am still trying understand, why a brick process should get a > client volfile (i.e. the 1st issue mentioned above).  > > Regards, > Raghavendra > > On Wed, Sep 26,

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Lock down period merge process

On 09/27/2018 10:05 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Now does this mean we block commit rights for component Y till > we have the root cause? > > > It was a way of making it someone's priority. If you have another > way to make it someone's priority that is better than this,

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: New option noatime

On 09/27/2018 09:08 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Writing this to solicit opinions on merging this [1] change that > introduces an option late in the release cycle. > > I went through the code, and most changes are standard option handling > and basic xlator scaffolding, other

[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: New option noatime

Writing this to solicit opinions on merging this [1] change that introduces an option late in the release cycle. I went through the code, and most changes are standard option handling and basic xlator scaffolding, other than the change in posix xlator code that handles the flag to not set atime

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Memory overwrites due to processing vol files???

On 09/26/2018 10:21 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > 2. Testing dashboard to maintain release health (new, thanks Nigel) > - Dashboard at [2] > - We already have 3 failures here as follows, needs attention from > appropriate *maintainers*, > (a) > https://build.gluster.

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Lock down period merge process

to retain the said health. Shyam [1] Maintainer meeting notes: https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/2018-September/005054.html (see Round table section) On 09/03/2018 01:47 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:54 PM Shyam Ranganathan <

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Branched and further dates

-release-5/ [3] 4.1 upgrade guide: https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Upgrade-Guide/upgrade_to_4.1/ On 09/13/2018 11:10 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > Hi, > > Release 5 has been branched today. To backport fixes to the upcoming 5.0 > release use the tracker bug [1]. > > We inte

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.1.5 released

On 09/21/2018 10:55 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 02:14:45PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >> SRC: >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/70/artifact/glusterfs-4.1.5.tar.gz >> HASH: >>

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] glusterfs-5.0rc0 released

We need the following projects tagged as well, 1) Glusterd2: @Kaushal I see https://github.com/gluster/glusterd2/tree/v5.0.0-rc0 is this the one? We need to version this 5.0rc0 as we are now in a different versioning scheme for GlusterFS. 2) gfapi-python: This needs to be py3 compliant as

[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Branched and further dates

Hi, Release 5 has been branched today. To backport fixes to the upcoming 5.0 release use the tracker bug [1]. We intend to roll out RC0 build by end of tomorrow for testing, unless the set of usual cleanup patches (op-version, some messages, gfapi version) land in any form of trouble. RC1 would

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.12.14 released

On 09/13/2018 10:10 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Anyone that can provide me with an ansible playbook, or even scripts > that need to run on server and client systems is strongly encouraged to > share them. We can then include them in the CentOS CI where client and > server systems can get reserved

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.12.14 released

On 09/11/2018 04:44 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 08:39:50PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 05:07:21PM +, jenk...@build.gluster.org wrote: >>> SRC: >>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/68/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.14.tar.gz >>> HASH: >>>

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: Release calendar and status updates

On 08/22/2018 02:03 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 08/14/2018 02:28 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> 2) Branching date: (Monday) Aug-20-2018 (~40 days before GA tagging) > > We are postponing branching to 2nd week of September (10th), as the > entire effort in this relea

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.1.3 released

On 08/28/2018 10:50 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 08:45:13AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> On 08/28/2018 08:19 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >>> On 08/27/2018 04:58 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: >>>> Done! CentOS Storage SIG packages are bui

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-4.1.3 released

On 08/27/2018 04:58 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Done! CentOS Storage SIG packages are built and should become available > for testing very soon (if not there yet). Niels, request you to check on this once more, I cannot see the packages in

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Release 5: Release calendar and status updates

On 08/14/2018 02:28 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > 2) Branching date: (Monday) Aug-20-2018 (~40 days before GA tagging) We are postponing branching to 2nd week of September (10th), as the entire effort in this release has been around stability and fixing issues across the board. Thus,

[Gluster-Maintainers] Test health report (week ending 19th Aug. 2018)

Although tests have stabilized quite a bit, and from the maintainers meeting we know that some tests have patches coming in, here is a readout of other tests that needed a retry. We need to reduce failures on retries as well, to be able to not have spurious or other failures in test runs. Tests

[Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Release calendar and status updates

This mail is to solicit the following, Features/enhancements planned for Gluster 5 needs the following from contributors: - Open/Use relevant issue - Mark issue with the "Release 5" milestone [1] - Post to the devel lists issue details, requesting addition to track the same for the release

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Lock down period merge process

On 08/09/2018 01:24 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 1:25 AM Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Maintainers, > > The following thread talks about a merge during a merge lockdown, with >

Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Lock down period merge process

the > janitors who have commit access in the event of a lock down to use their > judgment to merge such patches. > > [1]: https://mozilla-releng.net/treestatus > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 1:25 AM Shyam Ranganathan <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote: > >

  1   2   3   >