[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-22 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 22 April 2016 at 09:52, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:59:40AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can >> we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future? >> >>

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-22 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:59:40AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hi all, > > Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can > we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future? > > This was sent prior to or during the magazine meeting, if I'm not mistaken. >

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images

2016-04-22 Thread Justin W. Flory
On 04/22/2016 10:22 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On 04/22/2016 09:44 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: The article apparently was left in Scheduled status -- I moved it back to Pending Review status, and Patrick Uiterwijk kindly stripped it from the Fedora Planet so it wouldn't confuse anyone. It was

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images

2016-04-22 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 04/22/2016 09:44 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > The article apparently was left in Scheduled status -- I moved it back > to Pending Review status, and Patrick Uiterwijk kindly stripped it > from the Fedora Planet so it wouldn't confuse anyone. It was out > there for a few hours, though, FYI. I

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-22 Thread Joe Brockmeier
Hi all, Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future? This was sent prior to or during the magazine meeting, if I'm not mistaken. If there's *any* uncertainty around something like this, it should not be

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images

2016-04-22 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:14:05PM -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote: > On 04/21/2016 05:10 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > >On 04/21/2016 05:04 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > >>I can't make tonight's Magazine meeting, but I'm +1 to get this out > >>ASAP. I've moved this article to Pending Review, but I

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images

2016-04-21 Thread Justin W. Flory
On 04/21/2016 05:10 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On 04/21/2016 05:04 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: I can't make tonight's Magazine meeting, but I'm +1 to get this out ASAP. I've moved this article to Pending Review, but I already reviewed it and it looks fine. I added a couple additional links for

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-21 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 04/21/2016 05:04 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I can't make tonight's Magazine meeting, but I'm +1 to get this out > ASAP. I've moved this article to Pending Review, but I already > reviewed it and it looks fine. I added a couple additional links for > SEO power. > > Anything Justin OK's for

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-21 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:18:05AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 04/07/2016 06:59 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > On 04/07/2016 06:47 PM, Ryan Lerch wrote: > >> Will it just be a featured image? Or are there other graphics required? > >> > > Just the featured image. Thanks! > > OK, looks like

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-14 Thread Justin W. Flory
On 04/14/2016 09:14 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: Hi Joe, I didn't see this called out in the meeting notes from today (I missed the meeting, sorry), but we could either: * run this next Tuesday, in addition to the scheduled articles; or * run it on Wednesday, push Wednesday's article to Friday,

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-14 Thread Sylvia Sánchez
I vote for Wednesday. On Thursday, 14 April 2016, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:18:05AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > On 04/07/2016 06:59 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > > On 04/07/2016 06:47 PM, Ryan Lerch wrote: > > >> Will it just be a featured

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-14 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:18:05AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 04/07/2016 06:59 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > On 04/07/2016 06:47 PM, Ryan Lerch wrote: > >> Will it just be a featured image? Or are there other graphics required? > >> > > Just the featured image. Thanks! > > OK, looks like

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-12 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 04/07/2016 06:59 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 04/07/2016 06:47 PM, Ryan Lerch wrote: >> Will it just be a featured image? Or are there other graphics required? >> > Just the featured image. Thanks! OK, looks like we have the featured image here:

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-07 Thread Ryan Lerch
On Apr 8, 2016 08:39, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote: > > On 04/07/2016 06:38 PM, Ryan Lerch wrote: > > Are you able to open a ticket in the repo on pagure? > > > > That's probably something I can do. Is that what the cool kids are doing > these days? > Yup. :) thanks! Will it just be

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-07 Thread Sylvia Sánchez
Looking forward to read this article :-) Cheers, Sylvia -- marketing mailing list marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 04/07/2016 06:47 PM, Ryan Lerch wrote: > Will it just be a featured image? Or are there other graphics required? > Just the featured image. Thanks! jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-07 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 04/07/2016 06:38 PM, Ryan Lerch wrote: > Are you able to open a ticket in the repo on pagure? > That's probably something I can do. Is that what the cool kids are doing these days? -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb |

[Marketing] Re: [MAGAZINE PROPOSAL] Fwd: [DRAFT] Why we're retiring 32-bit Images (was Re: Retiring 32-bit images)

2016-04-07 Thread Ryan Lerch
I can do the featured image. Are you able to open a ticket in the repo on pagure? Cheers, Ryanlerch On Apr 8, 2016 08:37, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote: > Hey all, > > I'd like to publish this to the magazine early next week. Any > objections, or preferences on date? Halp with image