On 5/29/24 8:43 PM, E.M. wrote:
Hey all,
thanks for the recent comments.
I think one general investigation would be the European taxes amount we need to
pay.
Anyway, I personally would like the XSF to address to be present in US _and_ EU.
That might require twice the cost and twice the
Hey all,
thanks for the recent comments.
I think one general investigation would be the European taxes amount we need to
pay.
Anyway, I personally would like the XSF to address to be present in US _and_ EU.
But regardless of the discussion, this is also another call for your feedback
as its
On 12-05-2024 7:00 p.m., Nicola Fabiano wrote:
So, in my opinion, should be useful to debate whether lobbying the
EU during the DMA discussion could have been a good point for the
XFS to achieve its goals. The same goes for the implementation of
DMA in the real world e.g. as part
On 5/12/24 9:38 AM, E.M. wrote:
General question to all: Do you have concerns or general points that block this
attempt entirely?
Here are a few things I'm thinking about:
(1) Establishing a stronger official presence in Europe seems like a
good idea, because most of our activity is there.
Dear Mario,
On 12 May 2024, at 18:34, Mario Sabatino wrote:
> Dear Nicola, thank you for your replay. You have correctly indicated the real
> starting point of our discussion on this topic.
>
>> - what the XSF program will be for next year;
> I believe the organisation's mission statement
Dear Nicola, thank you for your replay. You have correctly indicated the
real starting point of our discussion on this topic.
- what the XSF program will be for next year;
I believe the organisation's mission statement outlines the XSF
programme for the future.
General question to all: Do you have concerns or general points that block this
attempt entirely?
12 may 2024 17:30:08 Nicola Fabiano :
> Hi Eddie,
>
> Thank you for your further intervention highlighting your point of view.
>
> On 12 May 2024, at 15:46, e...@mailbox.org wrote:
>
>> Hello,
Hi Eddie,
Thank you for your further intervention highlighting your point of view.
On 12 May 2024, at 15:46, e...@mailbox.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I like the attempt in general and have stated my thoughts in the first mail.
>
> Having any official representation in Europe would make also a
Ciao Mario,
Thanks for the feedback.
On 11 May 2024, at 12:58, Mario Sabatino wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> the discussion should cover two main points:
>
> 1) the possibility of lobbying into the EU institutions and how to start
> doing so;
From my point of view, this is not the first point to be
Hi Winfried,
Thank you for your feedback.
The tax issue is certainly important, but I am convinced that a solution can be
found both in terms of the Country with the lowest tax burden and in terms of
the type of organization to choose (Association or Foundation).
All the best,
Nicola
ssigen
Hello,
I like the attempt in general and have stated my thoughts in the first mail.
Having any official representation in Europe would make also a statement and I
think is also a matter of trust to outside entities. It would also adress the
strong community we have in Europe.
Nicola, further
Dear All,
the discussion should cover two main points:
1) the possibility of lobbying into the EU institutions and how to start
doing so;
2) the need to have an EU legal entity in order to receive funding from
the EU institutions.
For number 1) I don't think we need a legal entity based in
Hi,
I'm in favour, it would make several types of cooperation easier. But, I can't
judge what this would mean for taxes and so on.
Winfried
On 9 May 2024 12:09:32 CEST, Nicola Fabiano wrote:
>;TLTR
>
>Dear all,
>
>Regarding what is in the subject, I reproduced below the entire thread of
13 matches
Mail list logo
