On Nov 16, 2007 7:20 AM, Weldon Goree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 00:28 -0500, Piet Slaghekke wrote:
I like to filter my openBSD emails and the only way I can do it is if
everyone
send their email with misc@openBSD.org in the To field.
Please send email To
Hi,
On 16/11/2007, Zoong PHAM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason is the X sets don't have window manager cwm.
Where did you get this idea from? It's in the sets.
--
Best Regards
Edd
---
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
On 16/11/2007, at 7:20 PM, Weldon Goree wrote:
If only there were mail clients that allowed one to filter on To: or
Cc:...
And automatically added sarcasm dripping /sarcasm tags?
Hi there,
I am playing with softraid. So far it seems very good.
I have a 3 disk volume. If I remove one disk from the machine and
boot it up, this is the result:
---8---
# dmesg | grep softraid0
softraid0 at root
softraid0: not assembling partial disk that used to be volume 0
# bioctl
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:40:29PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:30:00PM +0100, Toni Mueller said that
could someone test this before i submit a bug report?
I've removed the '-s' flag for this reason, although I would very much
prefer to have it in place
Hi,
On Fri, 16.11.2007 at 11:43:38 +0100, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
i see the following: at startup time ntpd just hangs indefinitely
and must be terminated.
yes.
ntpd_flags=-s
could someone test this
hi there,
i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
i see the following: at startup time ntpd just hangs indefinitely
and must be terminated.
/etc/rc.conf.local:
ntpd_flags=-s
/etc/hostname.rl0:
dhcp NONE NONE NONE
otherwise a stock 4.2 install.
could someone test
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:43:38AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hi there,
i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
i see the following: at startup time ntpd just hangs indefinitely
and must be terminated.
/etc/rc.conf.local:
ntpd_flags=-s
Hi Jan,
Sorry for the delay, I overlooked your reply
If I use exactly the same commands / mount options as you I get less than
1MB/s
I know that I cannot expect a good performance with the CF card, but 5MB/s
would just be fine :-)
What else can I try?
Greetings
Stefan
My
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:25:40PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-16 12:39]:
Hi,
On Fri, 16.11.2007 at 11:43:38 +0100, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
i see the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Weldon Goree
Sent: 16 November 2007 08:20 AM
To: Piet Slaghekke
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Please send email directly to misc@openBSD.org (no cc
please)
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 00:28 -0500, Piet
On Friday, 16 November 2007 at 10:52:41 +, Edd Barrett wrote:
On 16/11/2007, Zoong PHAM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason is the X sets don't have window manager cwm.
Where did you get this idea from? It's in the sets.
Sorry about the confusion, I missed that.
It is really in the X
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:13:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:40:29PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:30:00PM +0100, Toni Mueller said that
could someone test this before i submit a bug report?
I've removed the '-s' flag for
On 16/11/2007, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hijacking the thread a bit:
I'll say :P
Do all your disks need to be the same size
to use softraid? softraid(4) and bioctl(8) do not mention anything
about that.
I assume so.
I could not work out a way of rebuilding inconsistent volumes
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:43:38AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hi there,
i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
i see the following: at startup time ntpd just hangs indefinitely
and must be
I have a problem with ipsec/isakmpd.
I have setup about 20 vpn's to various other sites, all using tunnel mode (
active ).
All but one are working fine.
One connection exhibits the following behaviour:
After isakmpd starts, the vpn starts correctly, main and quick mode are
successfully
(-:
Ok, Ok I love the responses to this request and I get the point (-:
Not such a good request.
I have listed the responses here (-: (note: classifications are the
sole opinion of this writer and may or may not be shared by others)
thanks everyone for the help on the removing a list users
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:43:38AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
i have upgraded to 4.2 and because i am frequently without net access
i see the following: at startup time ntpd just hangs indefinitely
and must be terminated.
Are you sure this did not happen before?
On 2007/11/16 14:10, Stefan Klein wrote:
Sorry for the delay, I overlooked your reply
If I use exactly the same commands / mount options as you I get less than
1MB/s
I know that I cannot expect a good performance with the CF card, but 5MB/s
would just be fine :-)
You can expect
hmm, on Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:30:00PM +0100, Toni Mueller said that
could someone test this before i submit a bug report?
I've removed the '-s' flag for this reason, although I would very much
prefer to have it in place in the case that I have net access. I don't
know whether it would be
Piet Slaghekke wrote:
I like to filter my openBSD emails and the only way I can do it is if everyone
send their email with misc@openBSD.org in the To field.
Please send email To misc@openBSD.org and do not CC it to this address.
Thanks!
wow. You ask one novice question and you
Piet Slaghekke wrote:
I like to filter my openBSD emails and the only way I can do it
is if everyone send their email with misc@openBSD.org in the
To field.
Please send email To misc@openBSD.org and do not CC it to this
address.
Thanks!
I've been struggeling with this as well, and you
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 00:28 -0500, Piet Slaghekke wrote:
I like to filter my openBSD emails and the only way I can do it is if everyone
send their email with misc@openBSD.org in the To field.
Please send email To misc@openBSD.org and do not CC it to this address.
Thanks!
If only
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:01:13AM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
On 11/16/07, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I am playing with softraid. So far it seems very good.
Hijacking the thread a bit: Do all your disks need to be the same size
to use softraid? softraid(4) and
On 11/16/07, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I am playing with softraid. So far it seems very good.
Hijacking the thread a bit: Do all your disks need to be the same size
to use softraid? softraid(4) and bioctl(8) do not mention anything
about that.
-Nick
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:45:04PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
On 16/11/2007, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hijacking the thread a bit:
I'll say :P
Do all your disks need to be the same size
to use softraid? softraid(4) and bioctl(8) do not mention anything
about that.
I
I'll take this as the documentation isn't good enough. Can you point me
to the area that isn't clear?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:29:20AM -0700, Chris Cameron wrote:
I'm in a good position to test Softraid on an AMD and an UltraSPARC,
however I've realized I don't know a lot about it (what
On 11/16/07, Chris Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm in a good position to test Softraid on an AMD and an UltraSPARC,
however I've realized I don't know a lot about it (what -exactly- it's
working to accomplish, and commands to use).
Is there an overview of Softraid to get me started so I
(-:
OK, OK, I love the responses to this request and I get the point (-: Not
such a good request.
I have listed the responses here (-: *(note: classifications are the sole
opinion of this writer and may or may not be shared by others)*
**
*thanks everyone for the help on the **removing a
Hi gang,
So I'm setting up my first wireless network for a small business with
OpenBSD acting as internet gateway. I am familiar with OpenBSD as
gateway but not in the wireless context. I picked myself up a card
that the docs say is supported (Linksys WMP54G) and will be installing
4.2 from my
On Nov 16, 2007 2:14 AM, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 09:23:45PM +0100, Andreas Andersson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Charset: ISO-8859-1
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
Hi all,
I try since a few days to setting up IPsec for my wireless network. The
internet gateway has a ral(4) device :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ $ ifconfig ral0
ral0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 00:18:f8:a5:f3:34
description: WLAN Link
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:42:11AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
Hi there,
I am playing with softraid. So far it seems very good.
I have a 3 disk volume. If I remove one disk from the machine and
boot it up, this is the result:
---8---
# dmesg | grep softraid0
softraid0 at root
I have to agree with Girish. Take some time and find out the average
bandwidth for your link. Then set the higher priority users a higher
percentage of the total amount than the other users.
You could also use a script. If you know what the current upload bandwidth
amount is then you could vary
I'm in a good position to test Softraid on an AMD and an UltraSPARC,
however I've realized I don't know a lot about it (what -exactly- it's
working to accomplish, and commands to use).
Is there an overview of Softraid to get me started so I can be of some use?
Chris
Fernando,
Doing a quick google search I see other people have also reported problems
with the on board Broadcom BCM5708 on the dells. Can you try another
network card like the Intel Pro/1000 MT (OpenBSD interface name: em0) ?
My place of business transfers an average of 450Mbit with OpenBSD
instead of pondering problems with using the whole disk, you could
just use svnd with a file.
I have a SanDisk Extreme III 2GB (at least I think it's III) in my
Soekris net5501 :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ dd if=/dev/zero of=nulls bs=65536 count=1600
1600+0 records in
1600+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 8.604 secs (12186647 bytes/sec)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ dd if=nulls of=/dev/null
On 11/16/07, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:01:13AM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
Hijacking the thread a bit: Do all your disks need to be the same size
to use softraid? softraid(4) and bioctl(8) do not mention anything
about that.
No you don't.
IIRC, the SanDisk above is from their Ultra II line. I wonder
how the newer Extreme III and Extreme IV perform.
In my reply to Stefan, it's a SanDisk Extreme III (2GB).
Jan
Who is talking about using windows apps?
I just said I ported it work in cygwin so that I don't have to use
windows at work. GNU userland beats even MS cli commands.
why cygwin not uwin or sfu??
cygwin is such a poor performer
Oh I guess I should elaborate on that :-)
What happens is that the larger disks gets coerced into a smaller size.
So you lose the excess capacity at the end of the disk.
I am actually working on a raid concat that you can use to claim all
unused space and make it into a larger disk but my first
On Nov 16 20:07:16, Paul de Weerd wrote:
I have a SanDisk Extreme III 2GB (at least I think it's III) in my
Soekris net5501 :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ dd if=/dev/zero of=nulls bs=65536 count=1600
1600+0 records in
1600+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 8.604 secs (12186647 bytes/sec)
On Nov 16, 2007 12:36 AM, Clint Pachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nonetheless, the bonnie++ results may provide some insight to the
problem for an experienced guru. What I found interesting is that the
CPU usage is really low for writes and rewrites when svnd is backed by
the whole disk. This is
On 16/11/2007, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You did find a bug; that is removing the disk and rebooting it and then
reinserting it. I am not sure how you did it but it should have
complained that your raid set is only partially there. Can you
elaborate on you actual steps and
I thought the manpage was just covering things that worked well, and in
the code itself were things waiting to be tested better. It shows a 3
chunk raid 1 setup, but doesn't mention anything about hot standby. I'm
not aware of 3 disk RAID 1 otherwise.
Also, for some reason (I think past misc@
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:26:32PM -0700, Chris Cameron wrote:
I thought the manpage was just covering things that worked well, and in
the code itself were things waiting to be tested better. It shows a 3
chunk raid 1 setup, but doesn't mention anything about hot standby. I'm
not aware of 3
My sandisks are quite fast (8MB/s or more, though I just
had to throw a fairly new SDCFJ-1024 out with read errors?!)
- I have a newish kingston which is slow (1.5MB/s elite
pro cf/1GB-S 50x) - and a bunch of assorted old 32-64MB
cards, the majority of which are reasonably quick
(fujifilm, sandisk
On 2007/11/16 12:49, Calomel wrote:
I have to agree with Girish. Take some time and find out the average
bandwidth for your link.
...
You could also use a script. If you know what the current upload bandwidth
amount is then you could vary the altq on $ExtIf bandwidth 744Kb line to
reflect
hasn't that been talked about a dozen times lately...
* Richard Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-14 11:33]:
I recall hearing tell (on here I think) that amd64 is a better arch for
routing, because of better interrupt handling or somesuch. Is this true?
i386 used too be much better. it is time
On 11/16/07, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
instead of pondering problems with using the whole disk, you could
just use svnd with a file.
Yeah but doesn't this hint at some horrible inefficiency in the stack somewhere?
-Nick
On Nov 16, 2007 1:32 PM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
instead of pondering problems with using the whole disk, you could
just use svnd with a file.
Well, I think he just found the itch. Now the question is whether
he'll scratch it, or will someone else find it interesting enough to
On 11/16/07, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/16/07, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
instead of pondering problems with using the whole disk, you could
just use svnd with a file.
Yeah but doesn't this hint at some horrible inefficiency in the stack
somewhere?
it hints at
I have ospf running between OpenBSD 4.2 GENERIC.MP#304 i386 and a 1721
Cisco running c1700-k9o3sy7-mz.123-23.bin. ospfctl show fib ospf
shows 2 networks, the loopbacks and the gre link however ospfctl show
database area 0.0.0.0 shows only the loopbacks, why doesn't the
database show the gre link,
Hi,
I was wondering if the 3ware 8006-2LP is supported in 4.2.
The http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html page only lists 5x00, 6x00 and 7x00
as supported devices, but the man page says that 8000 is supported as well.
(just trying to find a cheap SATA hardware raid card...)
Thanks !
Pawel.
On Nov 16, 2007 2:39 PM, Juan Miscaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang,
So I'm setting up my first wireless network for a small business with
OpenBSD acting as internet gateway. I am familiar with OpenBSD as
gateway but not in the wireless context. I picked myself up a card
that the docs
On 16 Nov 2007 at 16:36, Pawel Veselov wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if the 3ware 8006-2LP is supported in 4.2.
The http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html page only lists 5x00, 6x00 and
7x00
as supported devices, but the man page says that 8000 is supported as
well.
(just trying to find a cheap
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:15:22PM -0500, System Administrator wrote:
On 16 Nov 2007 at 16:36, Pawel Veselov wrote:
(just trying to find a cheap SATA hardware raid card...)
Executive summary: Find another card or use soft-raid.
The long answer:
The redundancy provided by a RAID set
Christian Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started playing with a CF in a bigger machine, and the results
are rather disappointing. [...]
So I briefly switched the CF cards.
* The SanDisk does on the order of 15 MB/s read, 10 MB/s write in
the amd64. Without monopolizing the CPU.
*
Hello,
I just had a server crash luckily I had all my configurations backed
up. So anyways I restore everything to the same way it was before the
server crash however pf and ftp-proxy isn't working the way it used
to. I installed using the same openbsd cds when I previously installed
it so
My system boots to xdm I login to ion. Is there any way I could try
out cwm while I am running ion?
Thanks.
61 matches
Mail list logo
