> > How can I know if the partition needs to be checked by fsck, I'd like to
> > test that.
>
> Check the output of dumpfs. clean=0 means that the filesystem is
> dirty and fsck should be run.
It is cheaper to just run fsck. If it has no work to do, it finishes.
On 2018-04-01, Mik J wrote:
> How can I know if the partition needs to be checked by fsck, I'd like to test
> that.
Check the output of dumpfs. clean=0 means that the filesystem is
dirty and fsck should be run.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber
Hello,
I have a script that mounts a partition and it works well except when the
partition needs to be fsck checked.How can I know if the partition needs to be
checked by fsck, I'd like to test that.If the partition needs to be checked by
fsck, I run fsck firstElse I mount the partition
Happy
Thanks Bob, Theo, Chris for your detailed answers.
>From Ingos answer :
> ... Later on, when somebody would have time to look, such unprocessd
reports have low visibility because they are nothing but an old
posting on a mailing list, drowning in a lot of noise from invalid
and resolved reports.
Hello all,
I have tried to installed 6.1 and 6.2 on a thinkpad x200 it works but X does
work ...
Its works great with 6.0 but then i dont get the good 6.2 packages and features
such as syspatch.
It seems lika well known problem:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs=150506076421862=2
Does
On 11:01 Sun 01 Apr, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Please don't.
I wasn't going to. This guy jsut asked for the feedback so I wrote him.
Hello:
I'm trying to get chrome or firefox display Chinese characters but I'm
failing. I have installed zh-wqy-bitmapfont and zh-fonts-kc and then I
run
fc-cache but they do not show up. In the font menu of chrome I cannot
find any option for those fonts to be used. Firefox is fine though.
I
I think the issue of triage deserves a more clear explanation of just
how huge a task this really is.
A team with members who are well familiar with each architecture and
having access to the actual models/devices showing the problem.
Even a "fix" might break other models within the same
> No such team exists. the tool used is irrelevant
Well, we have that tool today: it is a mailing list.
Also, we have a team which triages bugs on there: the developers.
Is it perfect? No.
Do things slip through the cracks? Sure. Because not enough people
triage. Not enough developers.
Christoph, your conversation is distracting.
Nobody gives a damn about the tool. Everyone gives a damn about the triage.
I hate to break it to you, but you are not the first person to broach
this discusson.
The only way this would work is with a dedicated team of people to
triage each area and
Do we want the 1% solution? No.
Will we accept something which comes with a full triage team? Yes.
Is a triage team being offered? No.
> My question was serious. I am not the enemy but I think this thing
> will only work if the people who use it accept / like to use it and so
> on.
>
> > bug
My question was serious. I am not the enemy but I think this thing
will only work if the people who use it accept / like to use it and so
on.
> bug tracking software is 1% of the solution. At least 80% of the
work is triage, and noone on this thread is serious about doing
that.
> Would the devs accept / use a bug tracker ? I ask because I find start
> something without the devs is burning time (see the .ru domain, the UI
> posts ... ).
We'd be happy to accept a bug-tracker which is slavishly quality-managed
and continually purified and kept current by a team of
Hi there,
There are simple ways of relaying local mails(connection on lo0 on port 25) to
a other mailserver. This is oky for logs and stuff but what's about mails
created by a php on the local webserver? His do I get smtpd to still do a auth
with username and pwd on lo0? Is it possible or do
Thanks for your fast answer.
I thought before, that the manual triage was the point.
Would the devs accept / use a bug tracker ? I ask because I find start
something without the devs is burning time (see the .ru domain, the UI
posts ... ).
If someone of the developers is interested a off list
On Sun, Apr 01 2018, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have probably a trivial (user) question.
>
> I've used texmacs on 6.1, amd64.
> Now I wanted to install it on 6.2, i386, but I can
> neither find a package nor i386 is mentioned
> among Archs in ports (the same for
Hi Christoph,
Christoph R. Murauer wrote on Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 01:56:47PM +0200:
> not a problem from the OpenBSD developers ?
There *is* an actual problem: Some bug reports are not processed
immediately because at the time they are posted, nobody happens to
find the time to investigate.
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:04:08AM +0100, niya wrote:
>
> > hi
> >
> > how do i configure a virtual switch to connect the interfaces of several
> > vm's together.
> > the interfaces will have fixed addresses and i will also be bridging the
> > interfaces to the host.
> > i know how to set up the
>The good news is that just PAP authentication should work, and does on
>Windows. The bad >news is that on OpenBSD I'm still not getting an IP address
>from Tek/Telus after the Authenticate-Ack.
I remember some time ago, that someone requested some help with pppoe
implementation since his ISP
Hello,
I have probably a trivial (user) question.
I've used texmacs on 6.1, amd64.
Now I wanted to install it on 6.2, i386, but I can
neither find a package nor i386 is mentioned
among Archs in ports (the same for amd64, btw.).
What can I do?
Why isn't i386 and amd64 available?
Thanks
Ruda
Just curious, could it be, that the problem is only a problem of the
OPs from the threads (bug tracker, github mirror and so on) and, not a
problem from the OpenBSD developers ?
If I read the last section from https://www.openbsd.org/report.html it
looks like that for me. I did not search the
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 09:47:18PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Jon Martin(jmg...@gmail.com) on 2018.03.22 13:19:51 -0600:
>>
>> To me this further indicates a "double authentication": a CHAP challenge
>> followed by PAP authentication. I have no idea how to set up a config
>> to answer that
On 2018-03-31, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> Setup another bugtracker which you like, connect it to bugs@ and send a
> link to this thread.
Please don't.
My suggestion of looking at bugs@ as a seed is for a *person* to read
new reports, collect information into one place,
hi
how do i configure a virtual switch to connect the interfaces of
several vm's together.
the interfaces will have fixed addresses and i will also be bridging
the interfaces to the host.
i know how to set up the bridge and then configure it with vm.conf
but i not sure how to setup the
24 matches
Mail list logo