On 20:12:45 Nov 16, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Say you have a 10Mb ethernet feed, plugged into an
unmanaged switch with a bunch of other people in the
building connecting to other ports, who sometimes use
up all available bandwidth on the uplink, and other
times use nothing.
I am not sure if
Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On 08:00:08 Nov 16, Jonathan Stewart wrote:
I though about doing something like that but the usable upload is
so variable that 60% could completely knock the normal_folk off
when it gets congested. I have 256kbit up right now and get
anywhere from as low as
I have to agree with Girish. Take some time and find out the average
bandwidth for your link. Then set the higher priority users a higher
percentage of the total amount than the other users.
You could also use a script. If you know what the current upload bandwidth
amount is then you could vary
On 2007/11/16 12:49, Calomel wrote:
I have to agree with Girish. Take some time and find out the average
bandwidth for your link.
...
You could also use a script. If you know what the current upload bandwidth
amount is then you could vary the altq on $ExtIf bandwidth 744Kb line to
reflect
Is it possible to use CBQ as a weighted round robin queue when the
upload bandwidth is highly variable? This is on FreeBSD RELENG_7 which
I believe uses pf from OpenBSD 4.1
Example queue idea:
Root Queue (1Mbps)
big_spenders (500Kbps, priority 5, borrow)
normal_folk (500Kbps, priority
Jonathan,
HFSC will do what you want. You could setup a queue using the realtime
directive to guarantee bandwidth to the big_spenders. Lets say 60% of the
total connection speed. Then assign 20% to the normal_folk. Both queues can
borrow from each other, but will always guarantee the amount of
Calomel wrote:
Jonathan,
HFSC will do what you want. You could setup a queue using the
realtime directive to guarantee bandwidth to the big_spenders. Lets
say 60% of the total connection speed. Then assign 20% to the
normal_folk. Both queues can borrow from each other, but will always
On 08:00:08 Nov 16, Jonathan Stewart wrote:
I though about doing something like that but the usable upload is so
variable that 60% could completely knock the normal_folk off when it
gets congested. I have 256kbit up right now and get anywhere from as
low as 64kbit to 160kbit+ actual
8 matches
Mail list logo
