Re: need help to understand the logic of new grammar

2018-10-31 Thread Илья Коскин
I'll try to answer myself. As i see, the options "from local" and "for local" is the defaults, and can be omitted? So, the first match can be cut to match action "mbox" ?? the my first question i have understood, if "from local" is the default, than it will not work without "from any" the second

Re: Question about backup mx

2018-10-31 Thread Matt Schwartz
Ok, thanks for the clarification. I guess one way to avoid the wait is to just manually schedule all. On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 8:48 AM Gilles Chehade On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 01:36:07PM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote: > > If I have two mail exchange servers and the primary one goes down, do > > I then

Re: Question about backup mx

2018-10-31 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 01:36:07PM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote: > If I have two mail exchange servers and the primary one goes down, do > I then have to manually issue an smtpctl schedule all to resume > delivery from the backup to the primary? > no, you just have to way for the backup one to

need help to understand the logic of new grammar

2018-10-31 Thread Илья Коскин
Hello list! Please look at my match-action definitions: action "mbox" mbox alias action "mda" mda "/usr/local/bin/procmail" alias action "relay" relay action "relay_dkim" relay host smtp://127.0.0.1:10027 match for local action "mbox" match from any for domain action "mda"#2nd match match

Re: 6.4 broke procmail .forward

2018-10-31 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Gilles, On 10/28/18 6:52 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: Please do yourselves a favor, ditch procmail in favor of fdm. I am not sure if fdm is an option. Looking at https://github.com/ft/fdm.git it seems that this code has been abandoned. Are there others? Regards Harri -- You received