Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

I beg to differ here and second Ilissa’s comments. I miss WiT. Lunch during the meeting worked. Giving up more of the weekend to travel does not show half the population gathering matters. On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 15:16 Morris, Tina via NANOG wrote: > Illissa, > The mixer is at 5pm Sunday,

Re: Why are paper LOAs still used?

Most important parts on the LOA are the explicit ASN, the name to be found in the cross-connect order portal and local contact data. Contractors need that. Global networks rarely have a contact appropriate for provisioning in a public facing database. On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 14:50 Sean Donelan

Re: Calling LinkedIn, Amazon and Akamai @ DE-CIX NY

Hi Thomas, You probably should remove sessions with networks explicitly *not* participating in route servers versus displaying them on a global shame list. Cheers, -ren On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:06 PM Thomas King wrote: > Hi all, > > > > Thanks for your support! This helps us getting all

Re: IOS new versions and network load

Thank you Jason! Big week ahead for http://as714.peeringdb.com Cheers! -ren.pr...@gmail.com > On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:48 AM, Christopher Morrow > wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:05 PM, JASON BOTHE wrote: >> >> My best experience with Apple has

Re: AS 714/6185 IX Peering

Third time should be the charm? (Thanks Job!) Cheers! -Ren Sent from my iPhone 6S Plus > On May 27, 2016, at 11:36 AM, Ren Provo <ren.pr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Several folks have written to ensure I spotted this during RIPE. Indeed, the > reminder to engage contacts post

Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue

Even better by Verizon - http://publicpolicy.verizon.com/blog/entry/unbalanced-peering-and-the-real-story-behind-the-verizon-cogent-dispute Some may recognize the name of the author for the WSJ article given she attended NANOG in Orlando -

Re: Comcast NOC Contact

Uhm, no I did not. I'd be happy to review your request. Send over your ASN to the proper channels please. -ren_pr...@cable.comcast.com On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Vinod K vinod...@hotmail.com wrote: What congested links r u seeing? When we contacted Comcast for peering, Ren Provo

Re: Comcast vs. Verizon for repair methodologies

Hi Patrick, Yikes. We can work together on getting this sorted. Will give you details directly. Cheers, -ren On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote: Given the recent VZ thread, I thought I'd show why my new house has crap Internet. The story: A piece

Re: Comcast Paid Peer Pricing

What is your ASN Nabil so I can find out what you submitted for a request, including scope and term. -ren On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Nabil Sharma nabilsha...@hotmail.com wrote: Dear NANOG: I seek pricing on Comcast AS7922 paid peer at following commit level: 1G 10G 100G Please reply

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

Keep in mind http://bgp.he.net is not always accurate. It is a great start but even after years of pointing it out there are adjacencies missing and oddly some listed as direct where no relationship even exists. On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: I

Re: CDN locations for US eyeball networks

Hi John, Take a look at - http://as7018.peeringdb.com http://as701.peeringdb.com http://as7922.peeringdb.com http://as7843.peeringdb.com http://as22773.peeringdb.com http://as20115.peeringdb.com Most list interconnect locations, others have policy pointers which list cities of interest.

Fwd: [NANOG-announce] NANOG 53 Update

Thanks for the reminder Betty! Comcast is hosting a social on Sunday night, October 9th, from 6:30-9:30pm on the 43rd floor at Comcast Center. NANOG and ARIN participants, registered by Wednesday the 5th of October, will be on the guest list with security in the lobby.  Late registrants will

Re: Pricing for Comcast Connectivity

Hi Oscar, John is right about the NDA. Feel free to reach out to Steve Lacoff, as noted at http://www.comcast.com/dedicatedinternet/ Volume, location, term, etc. are all factors to consider. Steve will be at NANOG if you, or others have questions. Cheers, -ren On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:01 PM,

Re: 3500 Egyptian prefixes?

~25 million people live in Cairo alone, many under the age of 30 given another 'arrival' is said to occur every 10 minutes. When we were there earlier this month most had cell phones and wi-fi spots were available all around the area that is being streamed on CNN right now. As a society they are

Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions

http://blog.comcast.com/2010/11/comcast-comments-on-level-3.html On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Dave CROCKER d...@dcrocker.net wrote: On 11/29/2010 2:40 PM, Rettke, Brian wrote: Essentially, the question is who has to pay for the infrastructure to support the bandwidth requirements of

Re: [Nanog-futures] Fwd: Proposed bylaws for NewNOG

Agree with both Joe Abley's recommendation for limited number of fellows (no more than one per meeting) nominated perhaps via the same method as PC nominations? Agree with Rose Klimovich's concerns as well regarding a finance committee for eventual audits. -ren On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:55 PM,

Re: [Nanog-futures] Did I miss the announcement?

Hi Bill, I suspect that Merit, with stimulus funding in hand, may have other non-NANOG interests at this point. I hope you are able to attend the community meeting and that Don Welch will clarify Merit's long-term interest. Cheers, -ren 2010/5/31 William Norton bill.nor...@gmail.com:

Re: [Nanog-futures] Did I miss the announcement?

On May 31, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Ren Provo ren.pr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bill, I suspect that Merit, with stimulus funding in hand, may have other non-NANOG interests at this point.  I hope you are able to attend the community meeting and that Don Welch will clarify Merit's long-term interest

Re: [Nanog-futures] My take on the transition

Well said Dan. A review of the transition announcement at http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog also noted this is yet another step in the continuing formalization of Internet governance institutions. RIPE, APRICOT, ARIN, ICANN, etc. have all faced similar junctures over time. I commend you,

Re: austin eats

Daniel I hope you'll be able to join us at Iron Cactus on Sunday night - http://renster.multiply.com/photos/album/553/Sunday_night_in_Austin On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Daniel Fox d...@smarsh.com wrote: Just ate at iron cactus on 6th and both the talapia and spicy shrimp tacos are

NANOG47 - Program Committee will meet next week to review second round submissions

Hi folks, There are many interesting abstracts in the tool at http://pc.nanog.org and we hope to see a few more presentations arrive prior to next Wednesday. Lightning talks will not be accepted until October. That doesn't mean you can't kick out that first draft to a friend for inspiration!

Re: Use of Default in the DFZ: banned in philly, see it now on the net!

One point of clarity here. Lightning talks are scheduled in a more spur of the moment fashion than the traditional submission process for general sessions. We often schedule lightning talks around a topic with potential to run short if QA isn't significant or we have a 15 minute gap before a

[NANOG-announce] Reminder - NANOG46 registration fees - $525 = $600 on Monday

Hi folks, Just a few reminders - The registration fee for NANOG46 is set to go up from US$525 to US$600 on Monday. https://nanog.merit.edu/registration/ The general program is full at this time. Lightning talks are being accepted at http://pc.nanog.org. Three lightning talks will be

Re: NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re impacting revenue]

Ron Bonica is leading a BOF during NANOG46 in Philly which may be of interest - BOF: IETF OPS MGMT Area, Ron Bonica, Juniper Networks Presentation Date: June 14, 2009, 2:00 PM - 3:30 PM Abstract: The IETF OPS MGMT Area documents management technologies and operational best common practices.

[NANOG-announce] NANOG46 - abstracts, trains hotels - oh my!

for the Loews can be made at http://www.phlgroupbooking.com/NANOG/ The NANOG Group Rate is $199 (plus 15.2% tax) which includes guest room Internet access. Group rate expires: May 29, 2009 Registration is open and we look forward to a fun NANOG in Philly! Cheers, -Ren Provo

Re: Inauguration streaming traffic

BitGravity did a great job. On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: As an aside... thanks to BBC for streaming this, I couldn't find another source that wasn't overloaded/jerky/ugly :( Thanks Brandon. -Chris

Re: Anyone notice strange announcements for 174.128.31.0/24

Hi Randy (and the cast of characters on this thread), Could you please put in a lightning talk for this experiment? It would be great to hear more about this in .DR. We're accepting submissions now for lightning talks on Monday the 26th of January. http://www.nanogpc.org is the best place.

Re: Anyone notice strange announcements for 174.128.31.0/24

Fair enough. Unfortunate, and I'll miss you in .DR, but understood. Now that doesn't mean other operators can't put in a lightning talk about the impact or 'event' this triggered in their own NOC environments along with what they recommend operators do to reduce the spun cycles G Cheers, -ren

Re: NANOG 45: Register Now, Hotel Link Available

Hi folks, As a reminder Peter Cohen is running the new and improved Peering BOF survey during NANOG45. If you wouldn't mind answering questions posted at http://tinyurl.com/bofsurvey after you register we would all appreciate it. Thanks! -Ren Provo On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Tom Daly t

Re: Outages BOF - NANOG 44 (los angeles).

Hi Virendra, Putting my NANOG Program Committee Member hat on, please work with Joel Jaeggli, also on the NANOG PC. He is moderating a Tools BOF Monday afternoon at 4:30 in the Heinsbergen Room as per http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog44/agenda.php If you are interested in leading an outages

[NANOG-announce] Reminder: Presentation materials for NANOG44/45 are welcomed

within the abstracts and highly encourage those who consider their submission a work in progress to complete the presentation portion and submit it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] today. Thanks! -Ren Provo, NANOG PC ___ NANOG-announce mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

[NANOG-announce] Reminder - NANOG PC tool is accepting presentations for both NANOG 44 45

Hi folks, As mentioned in the NANOG Program Committee call minutes, posted at http://www.nanog.org/pc.nanog44_minutes.html, we are currently accepting presentations for both NANOG44 and NANOG45. Several abstracts have been received for the October meeting and we are going to assume they are

Re: Comcast peering contacts

Hi Manolo, Peeringdb.com is the best place to cross-check what is available at a certain IX for public or private interconnection. http://as7922.peeringdb.com is what you are looking for WRT Comcast. http://www.comcast.com/peering details settlement-free interconnection guidelines. Cheers, -ren

Re: [NANOG] Comcast (AS 7922 - 33491) issues?

Hi Darrell, This should be resolved shortly. -ren On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Darrell Hyde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing tons of availability issues to networks with AS paths ending in 7922 33491. A couple of the prefixes in question are 98.214.0.0/15, 69.137.240.0/20,

Re: [Nanog-futures] The Peering BOF and the Fallout?

We consider the surveys, in addition to mailing list and hallway discussions. A rough cut from SJC was made available during the NANOG PC call this week but should be posted soon for NANOG42. Previous survey material - http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0710/surveyresults.html

Re: [Nanog-futures] The Peering BOF and the Fallout?

suggest some would like to see a more diverse selection of topics at the very least. Bill was asked on Wednesday not to make commitments until we, the NANOG PC, are able to review feedback and perhaps expand the cramped format into a track. Thanks, -Ren Provo, NANOG Program Committee, Vice-Chair

Re: [Nanog-futures] Submitted presentation request...

Hi Paul, Randy NANOG-Futures, We have a pretty full agenda this time and have received 5-10 additional presentations since the PC call last week. Given there are hosted events each night it will be difficult to expand the agenda and open up new slots for all the good presentations. We may need

Re: [Nanog-futures] Get those presenations in for NANOG42 please

, -Ren Provo, Program Committee On Dec 4, 2007 6:37 AM, David Barak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- On Tue, 12/4/07, Robert E. Seastrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Robert E. Seastrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Get those presenations in for NANOG42 please To: Martin Hannigan

[Nanog-futures] Get those presenations in for NANOG42 please

is the best location to review for complete submission guidelines. Many thanks in advance! -Ren Provo, Vice-Chair, NANOG Program Committee ___ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures