Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-08-09 Thread tom petch
From: netmod on behalf of Jürgen Schönwälder Sent: 04 August 2023 18:56 The use case described in the document is that client A tags nodes and client B consumes the tags, i.e., two management applications coordinate their work via tags set on the server's data tree. I am not sure who

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-08-04 Thread Jürgen Schönwälder
The use case described in the document is that client A tags nodes and client B consumes the tags, i.e., two management applications coordinate their work via tags set on the server's data tree. I am not sure who orchestrates management applications in this way but those who do likely do not

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-08-04 Thread tom petch
From: netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen Sent: 19 April 2023 02:59 This email begins a two-week WGLC on: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags-09 Please take time to review this draft and post comments by May 2nd. Favorable comments are especially welcomed.

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-08-04 Thread Qin Wu
-邮件原件- 发件人: Lou Berger [mailto:lber...@labn.net] 发送时间: 2023年7月24日 3:12 收件人: Qin Wu 抄送: netmod@ietf.org; Andy Bierman 主题: Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09 Authors, I may have missed it, but was the point below addressed? On 7/3/2023 2:23 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > YANG authors sho

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-07-23 Thread Lou Berger
Authors, I may have missed it, but was the point below addressed? On 7/3/2023 2:23 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: YANG authors should not need to tag nodes with specific metrics at all. I am not convinced that standard tags like "counter," or "loss," or "delay" are useful. IMO it would be better to

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-07-05 Thread Qin Wu
-- Apart from being able to deduce it from Section 4.3, it is not absolutely clear from Section 4 that the colon has special meaning. That is that all prefixes now and in the future are delimited by the colon. (This is important because, absent a colon, there is no way to distinguish an

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-07-05 Thread Adrian Farrel
Briefly in line with [AF2] Tl;dr All is good. Adrian -Original Message- From: Qin Wu Sent: 05 July 2023 05:14 To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Kent Watsen' ; netmod@ietf.org Subject: RE: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09 Hi, Adrian: -邮件原件- 发件人: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-07-04 Thread Qin Wu
发件人: Andy Bierman [mailto:a...@yumaworks.com] 发送时间: 2023年7月4日 2:24 收件人: Qin Wu 抄送: Kent Watsen ; netmod@ietf.org 主题: Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09 On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 2:34 AM Qin Wu mailto:bill...@huawei.com>> wrote: Andy: Sorry for late followup, please see my reply inline belo

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-07-04 Thread Qin Wu
Hi, Adrian: -邮件原件- 发件人: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] 发送时间: 2023年6月28日 23:25 收件人: Qin Wu ; 'Kent Watsen' ; netmod@ietf.org 主题: RE: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09 Thanks Qin, In line... Adrian == Discussion == Section 7. I'm not completely comfortable with the way you

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-07-03 Thread Andy Bierman
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 2:34 AM Qin Wu wrote: > Andy: > > Sorry for late followup, please see my reply inline below. > > > > *发件人:* netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] *代表 *Andy Bierman > *发送时间:* 2023年4月20日 2:39 > *收件人:* Kent Watsen > *抄送:* netmod@ietf.org >

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-06-28 Thread Adrian Farrel
Thanks Qin, In line... Adrian == Discussion == Section 7. I'm not completely comfortable with the way you use the base identity node-tag-type to capture the variants defined in the IANA registry shown in 9.2. What happens when another document defines a new IETF tag type? Is it necessary to

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-06-26 Thread Qin Wu
Hi, Adrian: -邮件原件- 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Adrian Farrel 发送时间: 2023年4月26日 6:10 收件人: 'Kent Watsen' ; netmod@ietf.org 主题: Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09 Hi, I have reviewed this draft during the normal working group process, and I just re-read it as part

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-06-26 Thread Qin Wu
Hi 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Andy Bierman 发送时间: 2023年4月20日 4:22 收件人: Kent Watsen 抄送: netmod@ietf.org 主题: Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09 Hi, Adding a couple missed comments inline... On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:38 AM Andy Bierman mailto:a...@yumaworks.com>>

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-06-26 Thread Qin Wu
Andy: Sorry for late followup, please see my reply inline below. 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Andy Bierman 发送时间: 2023年4月20日 2:39 收件人: Kent Watsen 抄送: netmod@ietf.org 主题: Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09 On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 6:59 PM Kent Watsen mailto:kent%2bi

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-04-25 Thread Adrian Farrel
describes some use cases to illustrate the use of node tags. -- 9.2 Why does "IETF Node Tags" have a capital 'N' when "YANG node Tag" and "YANG node Tag Prefixes" use a lower case 'n'? -Original Message- From: netmod On Behalf Of Kent Watsen Sent: 19

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-04-19 Thread Andy Bierman
Hi, Adding a couple missed comments inline... On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:38 AM Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 6:59 PM Kent Watsen wrote: > >> This email begins a two-week WGLC on: >> >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags-09 >> >> Please

Re: [netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-04-19 Thread Andy Bierman
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 6:59 PM Kent Watsen wrote: > This email begins a two-week WGLC on: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags-09 > > Please take time to review this draft and post comments by May 2nd. > Favorable comments are especially welcomed. > > I have

[netmod] WGLC on node-tags-09

2023-04-18 Thread Kent Watsen
This email begins a two-week WGLC on: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags-09 Please take time to review this draft and post comments by May 2nd. Favorable comments are especially welcomed. This draft went through a WGLC a year ago. The authors