On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 19:21:57 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Nobody will bite your head off ...
that's nonsense and you know it.
--
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
++
Mandrake HowTo's More:
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 22:55, HaywireMac wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 19:21:57 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Nobody will bite your head off ...
that's nonsense and you know it.
awww just because...
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to
On Thursday October 9 2003 01:50 am, Aron Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 22:55, HaywireMac wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 19:21:57 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Nobody will bite your head off ...
that's nonsense and you know it.
awww just because...
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 05:37, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday October 9 2003 01:50 am, Aron Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 22:55, HaywireMac wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 19:21:57 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
to the OT list now I can't post to MdkOT. All my posts
--- Original Message ---
It's a damn shame the only DSL connection I can get is SBC-
Yahoo. Yahoo sux, but they handle my mail and I'm stuck with
that.
I had been meaning to ask you about that SBC DSL connection I
inquired
at SBC about DSL and when I said Linux ... Well I'm not gonna
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 08:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Original Message ---
It's a damn shame the only DSL connection I can get is SBC-
Yahoo. Yahoo sux, but they handle my mail and I'm stuck with
that.
I had been meaning to ask you about that SBC DSL connection I
inquired
at
On Thursday October 9 2003 08:07 am, Aron Smith wrote:
It's a damn shame the only DSL connection I can get is SBC-
Yahoo. Yahoo sux, but they handle my mail and I'm stuck with
that.
I had been meaning to ask you about that SBC DSL connection I
inquired at SBC about DSL and when I
i've been using sbc dsl for 3-4 years now (since before pppoe)
and have never had any trouble other than the infrequent hardware
problems in their network. i've been using linux with it since
day 1. i'm not sure what problems tom is having with his and i
don't know what they told you about
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 06:07:41 -0700
Aron Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 05:37, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday October 9 2003 01:50 am, Aron Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 22:55, HaywireMac wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 19:21:57 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL
On Thursday October 9 2003 01:01 pm, ed tharp wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 08:37, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday October 9 2003 01:50 am, Aron Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 22:55, HaywireMac wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 19:21:57 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 15:18, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday October 9 2003 01:01 pm, ed tharp wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 08:37, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday October 9 2003 01:50 am, Aron Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 22:55, HaywireMac wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 19:21:57
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 09:21, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday October 9 2003 08:07 am, Aron Smith wrote:
It's a damn shame the only DSL connection I can get is SBC-
Yahoo. Yahoo sux, but they handle my mail and I'm stuck with
that.
I had been meaning to ask you about that SBC DSL
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 10:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've been using sbc dsl for 3-4 years now (since before pppoe)
and have never had any trouble other than the infrequent hardware
problems in their network. i've been using linux with it since
day 1. i'm not sure what problems tom is
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 08:37, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday October 9 2003 01:50 am, Aron Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 22:55, HaywireMac wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 19:21:57 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Nobody will bite your head off ...
that's nonsense
:07
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Mandrake Off topic [EMAIL PROTECTED], newbie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:[newbie] have we killed the reason we are here?
My patience with newbie is wearing somewhat thin too. I find myself
frequently
First please don't shoot me for posting this in more than one list.
I am seeing more and more post like this on newbie.
My patience with newbie is wearing somewhat thin too. I find myself
frequently just marking all messages as read without reading them
because so many are OT of just personal
On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 12:51 pm, ed tharp wrote:
So any suggestions?
Only that I would add that there has been more than one post on the
expert list lately, saying that people on the newbie list are so busy
with their OTs and political arguments that they do not reply to
ordinary requests
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 07:51, ed tharp wrote:
First please don't shoot me for posting this in more than one list.
I am seeing more and more post like this on newbie.
My patience with newbie is wearing somewhat thin too. I find myself
frequently just marking all messages as read without
and as a note,,, this discussion will continue on the OT list.
A good suggestion was already posted by Sir Robin, and I thought it was
worth repeating, (and since I was already going to post that this tread
should be continued over there) ;
I saw a documentary which included footage of research
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 12:51 pm, ed tharp wrote:
So any suggestions?
Only that I would add that there has been more than one post on the
expert list lately, saying that people on the newbie list are so busy
with their OTs and political arguments that they do not
Daryl Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 1:59 pm, robin wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 12:51 pm, ed tharp wrote:
So any suggestions?
How about suggesting that anti-Ms messages are forbidden? They seem to waste
a lot of bandwidth wilth posters
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 15:44, robin wrote:
Daryl Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 1:59 pm, robin wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 05 Oct 2003 12:51 pm, ed tharp wrote:
So any suggestions?
How about suggesting that anti-Ms messages are
On Sunday October 5 2003 03:08 pm, ed tharp wrote:
That's not bad as a general rule, but I still think there is a
place for MS-related posts when there is a relevance to
Linux/OSS, as in the case of the Phoenix BIOS post.
BTW, please delete the reply-to field in your mail client!
Sir
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 15:26:13 +0100, Daryl Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about suggesting that anti-Ms messages are forbidden? They seem to waste
a lot of bandwidth wilth posters aiming to prove their linux credentials by
dissing the alpha male.
Some, perhaps, but I believe there is
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 17:21, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Sunday October 5 2003 03:08 pm, ed tharp wrote:
That's not bad as a general rule, but I still think there is a
place for MS-related posts when there is a relevance to
Linux/OSS, as in the case of the Phoenix BIOS post.
BTW, please
25 matches
Mail list logo
