At some point, somebody wrote:
I *will* claim that (too) many Americans are hyper-sensitive to *any*
criticism of their country.
Actually, just about all the Americans I know personally take criticism
of their country surprisingly mildly. As one commented wryly (on
anti-American
robin wrote:
At some point, somebody wrote:
I *will* claim that (too) many Americans are hyper-sensitive to *any*
criticism of their country.
Actually, just about all the Americans I know personally take
criticism of their country surprisingly mildly. As one commented
wryly (on
On Tuesday September 17 2002 04:54 pm, et wrote:
snip
I think all this pro-/anti-American stuff is a smokescreen to
prevent people noticing that we are using a French distribution.
M. Robin
by jove. Bonapartists...damn I wish I had percieved such
Actually, recently on the
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 02:14 pm, robin wrote:
At some point, somebody wrote:
I *will* claim that (too) many Americans are hyper-sensitive to *any*
criticism of their country.
Actually, just about all the Americans I know personally take criticism
of their country surprisingly
Marco,
Anyone who doesn't agree 100% with what George W. Bush says
or does, is automatically considered a terrorist or terrorist
sympathiser, and can be detained indefinitely without a shred
of evidence, legal representation or even visitation rights
for his next of kin.
Have Newbie
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 06:42, Dennis Myers wrote:
On Monday 16 September 2002 10:27 pm, Marco Nadal wrote:
Shane! you've just decribed better then half the people
reading this
list, myself included! ;)
Mark
Anyone who doesn't agree 100% with what George W. Bush says
or
Wrong, we have a bill of rights. It isn't a Bill Gates of
rights but it works
none the less. People disagree with W all the time and live
to tell about
it, and in this day and age most Americans know their rights
very well, we
have tv programs with new episodes every week that let
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 08:13, Patrik Marxer wrote:
To be honest, we don't like bush much over here. I guess not many in europe
do. In the rest of the world it may be similar. In fact he is the most
unpopular leader in the world, as I have heard - even more unpopular than
Saddam Hussein.
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 06:16, Ricardo Castanho de Oliveira Freitas wrote:
Em Ter 17 Set 2002 01:42, Dennis Myers escreveu:
That was before G.W.Bush!
I'm Brazilian and I've lived during our so called military period (they were
rulling the country for over 30 years!)
None of those military
On Monday 16 September 2002 11:27 pm, you wrote:
Shane! you've just decribed better then half the people
reading this
list, myself included! ;)
Mark
Anyone who doesn't agree 100% with what George W. Bush says
or does, is automatically considered a terrorist or terrorist
sympathiser,
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 11:47, Alastair Scott wrote:
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 08:13, Patrik Marxer wrote:
To be honest, we don't like bush much over here. I guess not many in
europe do. In the rest of the world it may be similar. In fact he is the
most unpopular leader in the world, as I
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 03:26 am, you wrote:
Marco,
Anyone who doesn't agree 100% with what George W. Bush says
or does, is automatically considered a terrorist or terrorist
sympathiser, and can be detained indefinitely without a shred
of evidence, legal representation or even
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 04:56 am, you wrote:
Wrong, we have a bill of rights. It isn't a Bill Gates of
rights but it works
none the less. People disagree with W all the time and live
to tell about
it, and in this day and age most Americans know their rights
very well, we
have
Em Ter 17 Set 2002 06:52, Alastair Scott escreveu:
As his motto: Or we agree with him or we are against him!
You are absolutely right!
Although, I've listenned him saing that!
Great emphasis on TV!
I agree that the idea was what you mentioned, but ...
The problem I see is the over-reaction on
snip call me a
consiprisy theroy nut, but in my lifetime you will _never_ convince me that
of Geo. the elder had not survived WW2, we would have never been in 'Nam.
let me (at least) correct the double negitive;
that if Geo. the elder had not survived WW2, we would have been in 'Nam.
Want to
I'm not going to add much to this thread, except to say, I do not feel proud
of my Country today , I feel that a much loved friend, with whom in the
past
we have shared many experiences, has just insisted that I help him murder
his motherinlaw because he and his wife want to live off the income
the part I really enjoy tho.. is who gets to decide, and by what criteria,
what make a person a terrorist? that to me is (at the least) one of the
biggest malfunctions of this whole pile. Am I a terrorist? what if I speak
openly against the Bush Family? what if I call for the USA to join the
On Monday 16 September 2002 11:27 pm, you wrote:
Anyone who doesn't agree 100% with what George W. Bush says
or does, is automatically considered a terrorist or terrorist
sympathiser, and can be detained indefinitely without a shred
of evidence, legal representation or even visitation rights
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 04:56 am, you wrote:
And Americans wonder why much of the rest of the planet hates them :-(
I do...
Yes, you have a Bill of Rights. And it applies to (white) Americans. It
just looks like it doesn't need apply to anyone who isn't an American.
Thats just plain
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 09:50 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
(Certainly, in the United Kingdom, nobody would consider even the less
successful Prime Ministers of recent times, such as Jim Callaghan and
John Major, to be stupid;
Couldn't resist jumping in here - John Major made a great play
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 15:05, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 03:13 am, you wrote:
To be honest, we don't like bush much over here. I guess not many in
europe do. In the rest of the world it may be similar. In fact he is the
most unpopular leader in the world, as I
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 09:26, Miark wrote:
Marco,
Anyone who doesn't agree 100% with what George W. Bush says
or does, is automatically considered a terrorist or terrorist
sympathiser, and can be detained indefinitely without a shred
of evidence, legal representation or even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 16 September 2002 9:42 pm, Dennis Myers did speak unto the huddled
masses, saying:
Anyone who doesn't agree 100% with what George W. Bush says
or does, is automatically considered a terrorist or terrorist
sympathiser, and can be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 12:26 am, Miark did speak unto the huddled
masses, saying:
You, on the other hand, just criticized the US. Worse, you are wrong,
and clueless as to what goes on here. (And watching Aussie news
doesn't count.) Do you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 11:47 am, robin did speak unto the huddled
masses, saying:
I think all this pro-/anti-American stuff is a smokescreen to prevent
people noticing that we are using a French distribution. Hasn't anyone
noticed the
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 03:56 am, Barran, Richard wrote:
Wrong, we have a bill of rights. It isn't a Bill Gates of
rights but it works
none the less. People disagree with W all the time and live
to tell about
it, and in this day and age most Americans know their rights
very
On Monday 16 September 2002 10:27 pm, Marco Nadal wrote:
Shane! you've just decribed better then half the people
reading this
list, myself included! ;)
Mark
Anyone who doesn't agree 100% with what George W. Bush says
or does, is automatically considered a terrorist or terrorist
Em Ter 17 Set 2002 01:42, Dennis Myers escreveu:
That was before G.W.Bush!
I'm Brazilian and I've lived during our so called military period (they were
rulling the country for over 30 years!)
None of those military dictators scares me more than G.W.Bush!
As his motto: Or we agree with him or
28 matches
Mail list logo
