Re: [Nut-upsuser] ups.test.result meaning

On Oct 31, 2020, at 8:13 PM, Rick Dicaire wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 2:42 PM Tim Dawson > wrote: > I'm going to guess that since your test runtime of 305 is very close to the > low limit of 300, that's the warning. Not yet a fail, but very, very close. >

Re: [Nut-upsuser] ups.test.result meaning

On Oct 31, 2020, at 8:30 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> battery.voltage: 16.0 > At that voltage, 5 of the 12 cells are shorted >> battery.voltage.nominal: 24 The 16.0 is a scaled version of the fixed (bogus) 24.0 V reading, similar to this unit:

[Nut-upsuser] APC Back-UPS 1500 RS - looking for help with strange behaviour

Hi All, hoping someone might have some insights to what is going wrong with my NUT setup and my APC Back - UPS RS 1500 (specifically a BR1500GI) using the usbhid driver.

Re: [Nut-upsuser] ups.test.result meaning

> > > > battery.voltage: 16.0 > At that voltage, 5 of the 12 cells are shorted > > output.voltage: 138.0 > too high by about 15 volts > > Wow! That battery is beyond toasted, shoulda been replaced months ago. > And the output voltage is a bit much if its truthfull. > Thanks for the response

Re: [Nut-upsuser] ups.test.result meaning

On Saturday 31 October 2020 20:13:48 Rick Dicaire wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 2:42 PM Tim Dawson wrote: > > I'm going to guess that since your test runtime of 305 is very close > > to the low limit of 300, that's the warning. Not yet a fail, but > > very, very close. > > I tried setting >

Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT Installation Issue

On Oct 31, 2020, at 5:36 PM, bobby wrote: > > Fatal error: 'maxretry' is not a valid variable name for this driver. https://networkupstools.org/docs/man/ups.conf.html 'maxretry' is in the global section, which needs to come before the UPS/driver-specific sections

Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT Installation Issue

upsdrvctl start Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.7.4 Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.41 (2.7.4) USB communication driver 0.33 Fatal error: 'maxretry' is not a valid variable name for this driver. Look in the man page or call this driver with -h for a list of valid variable

Re: [Nut-upsuser] ups.test.result meaning

I'm going to guess that since your test runtime of 305 is very close to the low limit of 300, that's the warning. Not yet a fail, but very, very close. On October 31, 2020 11:41:39 AM CDT, Rick Dicaire wrote: >Hi folks, new to list... >nut 2.7.2 on Ubuntu 16.04 with Cyberpowersystems

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Can't get CyberPower UPS to work with Raspberry Pi 4

On Saturday 31 October 2020 11:55:54 Charles Lepple wrote: > On Oct 30, 2020, at 12:22 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Thursday 29 October 2020 22:12:00 Charles Lepple wrote: > >> On Oct 28, 2020, at 9:56 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > >>> Which looks very incomplete to me. OTOH, its not a very

[Nut-upsuser] ups.test.result meaning

Hi folks, new to list... nut 2.7.2 on Ubuntu 16.04 with Cyberpowersystems CP1350PFCLCD. After performing upscmd cp1350@localhost test.battery.start.quick the result was "Done and warning". I searched through syslog but could find no additional information. What is the warning? Battery charge

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Can't get CyberPower UPS to work with Raspberry Pi 4

On Oct 30, 2020, at 12:22 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Thursday 29 October 2020 22:12:00 Charles Lepple wrote: > >> On Oct 28, 2020, at 9:56 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> Which looks very incomplete to me. OTOH, its not a very big UPS but >>> neither is the pi. I have tested that, and it

Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT Installation Issue

On Oct 30, 2020, at 3:00 PM, bobby wrote: > > I installed NUT on my raspberry pi. I've been following this tutorial: > https://melgrubb.com/2016/12/11/rphs-v2-ups/. I am trying to use NUT to > monitor my cyberpower UPS. I seem to have this problem though: upsc > cyberpower@localhost Init

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Can't get CyberPower UPS to work with Raspberry Pi 4

On Oct 31, 2020, at 8:42 AM, Robert Stocker wrote: > > I successfully changed my UPS name and after a reboot, things seems to be > well on their way. Do I need to worry about this line in the upsc results: > > Init SSL without certificate database

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Can't get CyberPower UPS to work with Raspberry Pi 4

I successfully changed my UPS name and after a reboot, things seems to be well on their way. Do I need to worry about this line in the upsc results: Init SSL without certificate database On Thu, Oct 29, 2020, 10:15 PM Charles Lepple wrote: > On Oct 29, 2020, at 2:44 PM, Robert Stocker wrote: