On 4/24/24 18:06, Charles Lepple wrote:
My guess is that if you sent 520, upsc would return 8 (for a revised
maximum of 511 seconds). If not, the UPS is even weirder than most
As you found, the ignorelb option is available to work around
limitations in the UPS shutdown logic.
I can confirm
On Apr 24, 2024, at 3:45 PM, tim.o via Nut-upsuser
wrote:
>> Have you tried any other values? 3600 is hex 0xe10, and 16 is 0x10, so it is
>> quite possible the UPS is using an 8-bit field to store battery.runtime.low.
>> I'm guessing the maximum is going to be 255.
>>
> I am not sure I
Unfortunately, the SUCCESS response is just saying that upsrw was able to send
that request to upsd (i.e. the username/password were correct). As you saw, the
real proof is in what you read back from upsc.
Ah, gotcha.
Have you tried any other values? 3600 is hex 0xe10, and 16 is 0x10, so it
> On Apr 23, 2024, at 3:51 PM, tim.o via Nut-upsuser
> wrote:
>
> The value changed to battery.runtime.low: 16, instead of 3600. I don't
> understand why, because executing the command resulted in SUCCESS.
Unfortunately, the SUCCESS response is just saying that upsrw was able to send
that
