Re: [Nut-upsuser] [networkupstools/nut] RFC: clarify and complete battery dates (#1063)

2021-08-12 Thread Arnaud Quette via Nut-upsuser
Le mer. 11 août 2021 à 16:23, Roger Price a écrit : > On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > Le lun. 9 août 2021 à 15:06, Roger Price a > écrit : > > If nobody has objected after a week, then I suggest > > > > 1) Go ahead with the proposed additions > > 2) Give us

Re: [Nut-upsuser] [networkupstools/nut] RFC: clarify and complete battery dates (#1063)

2021-08-11 Thread Roger Price
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Arnaud Quette wrote: Le lun. 9 août 2021 à 15:06, Roger Price a écrit : If nobody has objected after a week, then I suggest   1) Go ahead with the proposed additions   2) Give us a link to the new docs/nut-names.txt Hi Roger, thanks for your answer! I

Re: [Nut-upsuser] [networkupstools/nut] RFC: clarify and complete battery dates (#1063)

2021-08-11 Thread Arnaud Quette via Nut-upsuser
Le lun. 9 août 2021 à 15:06, Roger Price a écrit : > On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > small update (replay of #1062): these were announced to the mailing list > as an RFC for a week, without feedback so far: > > >

Re: [Nut-upsuser] [networkupstools/nut] RFC: clarify and complete battery dates (#1063)

2021-08-09 Thread Roger Price
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, Arnaud Quette wrote: small update (replay of #1062): these were announced to the mailing list as an RFC for a week, without feedback so far: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2021-August/012485.html Is a "no answer / objection" considered as a rough