Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS/NUT with openSUSE 13.1

2015-09-08 Thread Roger Price
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Rob Groner wrote: I executed lsusb to verify the USB device is there, and it is. I tried the shutdown command again with debug enabled, but it didn't seem to reveal much more: ---

Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS/NUT with openSUSE 13.1

2015-09-08 Thread Rob Groner
Roger, rtd@linux-5048> sudo /usr/local/ups/bin/usbhid-ups -a rtdups -k -DDD Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.39 (2.7.2.6_RTD) USB communication driver 0.32 0.00 debug level is '3' 0.000405 upsdrv_initups... 0.004386 Checking device (0930/6545) (002/002)

Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS/NUT with openSUSE 13.1

2015-09-08 Thread Roger Price
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Rob Groner wrote: Roger, rtd@linux-5048> sudo /usr/local/ups/bin/usbhid-ups -a rtdups -k -DDD Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.39 (2.7.2.6_RTD) USB communication driver 0.32 0.00 debug level is '3' 0.000405 upsdrv_initups... ... 0.004555

Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS/NUT with openSUSE 13.1

2015-09-08 Thread Charles Lepple
On Sep 8, 2015, at 4:48 PM, Rob Groner wrote: > > 0.005927Device matches > 0.005940failed to claim USB device: Device or resource busy > 0.005954failed to detach kernel driver from USB device: No such file or > directory Rob, this is a bit of a tough one to

Re: [Nut-upsuser] UPS/NUT with openSUSE 13.1

2015-09-08 Thread Rob Groner
Roger, Ok, I simplified it somewhat. I start all of the NUT services on the command line after boot, to verify they are all starting correctly. They appear to be. Doing this, I found the systemd service unit to somewhat reliably execute the shutdown. I only tried 5 times, but it worked each

Re: [Nut-upsuser] monitoring Eaton parallel/redundant UPSs

2015-09-08 Thread Charles Lepple
On Sep 2, 2015, at 5:54 PM, John Thurston wrote: > > But what about that "Bypass Paralleling Switchboard"? I suspect it is > possible that it could be used to ignore the input from UPS-A and rely only > on UPS-B to handle the load. If I'm only monitoring the status of

Re: [Nut-upsuser] APC BACK UPS 2200 model BZ2200BI-BR (update)

2015-09-08 Thread Charles Lepple
@rpvelloso on Github suggested some changes (driver version v0.64) that should help with the initial sync: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/debc8e0280ea4de9a0db5ca34aa66705b285f61f It's the solis_debug branch on Github. Does that help? I'm concerned that it might get out of sync