Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling

2017-02-15 Thread Tim Richards
List, In the interest of completeness, I emailed the author of the NUT fencing agent and asked him about his setup. His UPSes were all networked, so my USB "cross connected" use, while working, is probably beyond any design specs. His reply is quoted below. Tim. Hi Tim, I'm afraid I'm

Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling

2017-02-13 Thread Tim Richards
-bounces+tims_tank=hotmail@lists.alioth.debian.org] On Behalf Of Manuel Wolfshant Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2017 1:53 AM To: nut-upsuser Mailing List Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling On 02/13/2017 04:39 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Feb

Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling

2017-02-13 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 02/13/2017 04:39 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Tim Richards wrote: Feb 13 23:11:42 systemd[1] Starting LSB: UPS monitoring software (deprecated, remote/local)... Feb 13 23:11:43 usbhid-ups[2093] Startup successful Feb 13 23:11:43 upsd[1 932]

Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling

2017-02-13 Thread Charles Lepple
On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Tim Richards wrote: > > Feb 13 23:11:42 systemd[1] Starting LSB: UPS monitoring software (deprecated, > remote/local)... > Feb 13 23:11:43 usbhid-ups[2093] Startup successful > Feb 13 23:11:43 upsd[1 932] Starting NUT UPS drivers ..done > Feb

Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling

2017-02-13 Thread Tim Richards
gards, Tim. -Original Message- From: Charles Lepple [mailto:clep...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 12 February 2017 11:57 AM To: Tim Richards Cc: nut-upsuser Mailing List Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling On Feb 10, 2017, at 5:48 PM, Tim Richar

Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling

2017-02-11 Thread Charles Lepple
On Feb 10, 2017, at 5:48 PM, Tim Richards wrote: > > I am trying to kill two birds with one stone, that is UPS protection from > power failure and cluster node fencing (Stonith) with the UPS ability to cut > power to a node. Somebody has done this, as there exists a

Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling

2017-02-10 Thread Tim Richards
From: Nut-upsuser [mailto:nut-upsuser-bounces+tims_tank=hotmail@lists.alioth.debian.org] On Behalf Of Roger Price Sent: Friday, 10 February 2017 11:17 PM To: nut-upsuser Mailing List Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling On Sun, 5 Feb 2017, Ti

Re: [Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling

2017-02-10 Thread Roger Price
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017, Tim Richards wrote: Setup: Active/Passive Two Node Cluster. Two UPSes (APC Smart-UPS 1500 C) with USB communication cables cross connected (ie UPS-webserver1 monitored by webserver2, and vice versa) to allow for stonith/fencing OS OpenSuse Leap 42.2 NUT version

[Nut-upsuser] NUT configuration complicated by Stonith/Fencing cabling

2017-02-05 Thread Tim Richards
Hello List, Any suggestions to solve the following would be most appreciated. Setup: Active/Passive Two Node Cluster. Two UPSes (APC Smart-UPS 1500 C) with USB communication cables cross connected (ie UPS-webserver1 monitored by webserver2, and vice versa) to allow for stonith/fencing OS