Re: [Nut-upsuser] monitoring Eaton parallel/redundant UPSs

On Sep 2, 2015, at 5:54 PM, John Thurston wrote: > > But what about that "Bypass Paralleling Switchboard"? I suspect it is > possible that it could be used to ignore the input from UPS-A and rely only > on UPS-B to handle the load. If I'm only monitoring the status of

[Nut-upsuser] monitoring Eaton parallel/redundant UPSs

I have been happily using NUT to monitor a couple of Eaton UPS. These are independent UPSs, each driving one "leg" of the power in our data center. In this scenario, I've told my clients they need to have one UPS working and to shutdown when the last UPS reaches critical battery. I have