Re: [Nut-upsuser] Status OB (on battery) when polling a Liebert PSA

2011-02-11 Thread Pier Paolo Glave
I'm ready now to go on with NUT configuration: I think I'm able now to have a controlled PC shutdown. I'll let you know how it goes. That's also something I would be interested in. Hi Arjen and all, I succeeded in having a controlled shutdown, when the UPS went in low-battery status. I'm

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Status OB (on battery) when polling a Liebert PSA

2011-02-07 Thread Pier Paolo Glave
Hi Arjen, Thanks for your answer. If you have time to support me, I will for sure follow you, providing all the information you need. I'm a software designer too, so don't hesitate to ask for some particular build or to make changes at source code level. Looking at the rejected earlier message,

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Status OB (on battery) when polling a Liebert PSA

2011-02-07 Thread Pier Paolo Glave
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Arjen de Korte nut+us...@de-korte.org wrote: It looks like the firmware developers missed the fact that for some units, an exponent is used (V, VA and W) which causes a 7 decades offset. You either have to account for that in the units exponent or use a type

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Status OB (on battery) when polling a Liebert PSA

2011-02-07 Thread Arjen de Korte
Citeren Pier Paolo Glave pierpaolo.gl...@gmail.com: Yes! The results are quite different now :) That's good to know. This is the result of upsc now, when AC power is plugged in: battery.charge: 100 battery.type: PbAc battery.voltage: 28 battery.voltage.nominal: 2 device.mfr: Emerson Network

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Status OB (on battery) when polling a Liebert PSA

2011-02-06 Thread Arjen de Korte
Citeren Pier Paolo Glave pierpaolo.gl...@gmail.com: Everything seems to be fine, except that, when I run upsc liebert@localhostups.status, it retuns OB, even if the UPS is currently online. Looking at the rejected earlier message, I'd say you have a Belkin OEM device that has a very broken