Hi Alexander,
Thanks for getting back to me on this. Unfortunately it's still a no-go. The
driver still fails in the same manner - only it takes longer to do so:
---snippet---
Q1 detail: (0 bytes) =
Asking for UPS status [Q1]...
Q1 = FAILED [short read]
Q1 detail: (0 bytes) =
Asking for UPS status
On Jan 14, 2008 10:32 PM, Joseph Borg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added some printf statements to megatec.c and verified that the return
value is '-110' but I can't seem to figure out why this is happening. I
added printf statements to ser_get_line in serial.c but none seem to be
printing (as
Hi,
Thanks for looking into this. This is a snippet of the output I get:
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] drivers]# ./megatec_usb -D -u root -a unial1200
Network UPS Tools 2.3.0-1222M - Megatec protocol driver 1.5.11 [megatec_usb]
Carlos Rodrigues (c) 2003-2007
Serial-over-USB
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:08:48 +0300, Joseph Borg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for looking into this. This is a snippet of the output I get:
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] drivers]# ./megatec_usb -D -u root -a unial1200
[snip]
Ok, obviously this is the same problem.
Still the same I'm afraid :-(
U trunk
Checked out revision 1225.
.
.
-
Q1 = FAILED [timeout]
5 out of 5 detection attempts failed (minimum failures: 2).
Megatec protocol UPS not detected.
---
Thanks for your on-going support on this.
Joe
On
Just a minor update on this, the repetitions after the first one (given in
my previous emails) also return:
Q1 = FAILED [timeout]
I added some printf statements to megatec.c and verified that the return
value is '-110' but I can't seem to figure out why this is happening. I
added printf
Hi,
I'm wondering whether this could be the same issue I'm having. I emailed
about this about two weeks ago or so. I'm trying to get NUT to work with my
Unitek Alpha 1200sx. The driver is the megatec_usb one. When the driver does
successfully load, it seems to work fine. However, more often than
Just a minor update on this. I've tried download the svn tree and compiled
the megatec_usb driver with the following config options (this seems to be
the layout in Fedora but I may have missed something):
./configure --with-user=nut --with-group=nut --with-usb
--sysconfdir=/etc/ups/
I then
On Jan 13, 2008 2:11 PM, Joseph Borg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exec: /sbin/megatec_usb -a unial1200
Network UPS Tools 2.3.0-1222M - Megatec protocol driver 1.5.11 [megatec_usb]
Carlos Rodrigues (c) 2003-2007
Serial-over-USB transport layer for Megatec protocol driver [megatec_usb]
Andrey
The permissions seem right to me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] drivers]# ll /dev/bus/usb/001
total 0
crw-r--r-- 1 root root 189, 0 2008-01-08 14:16 001
crw-rw-r-- 1 root uucp 189, 1 2008-01-13 21:22 002
The device in question is 002 and these same exact permissions work fine
sometimes. I had the above
Apologies for the number of emails; I just tried starting as user root and
the error message changes but the outcome is the same:
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] drivers]# /sbin/upsdrvctl -u root -D start
Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.2.0-
Starting UPS: unial1200
exec:
Apologies for the number of emails; I just tried starting as user root and
the error message changes but the outcome is the same:
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] drivers]# /sbin/upsdrvctl -u root -D start
Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.2.0-
Starting UPS: unial1200
exec:
I recently bought a Belkin F6H375 UPS. It connects to the computer via USB.
Searching the Internet led me to believe that the megatec_usb driver in nut
supports this UPS, however I've been unable to get it to work.
I have this in ups.conf:
[belkinusb]
driver = megatec_usb
port = auto
13 matches
Mail list logo
