Rifaat,
I have a few minor nits in the doc, nothing of significant concern for WGLC.
1. When describing the visuals documenting the flows, there is a step that
includes “The user authenticates to the authorization server”. In each case
this should include verbiage to indicate that this is
I had promised at the 119 meeting that I would review this document and give
feedback. I have completed that document and other than two potential
clarification points, I found it to be helpful.
The following two areas could be slightly improved:
1. At the end of section (5) there is a
Kai,
How would the TTS trust the incoming "subject" value if not signed? Do you
have something in mind?
Thanks,
George
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 3:46 AM Kai Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Sorry for replying to this so late to this thread. Although self-signed
> JWTs may help to fill the
We have not received any feedback on this document so far.
This is a reminder to review and provide feedback on this document.
If you reviewed the document, and you do not have any comments or concerns,
it would be great if you can send an email to the list indicating that.
Regards,
Rifaat
All,
Hannes and I discussed the status of this document.
We believe that this document received significant feedback and a new
updated document is needed.
Because of that, after a new version is issued, we will start a *second
WGCL* on this document.
Regards,
Rifaat
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at
