2008/10/27 Linas Vepstas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/10/24 Cassio Pennachin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AFAIK, policies have not been changed. The messages you mention are
accurate.
I guess I don't understand the policy. I can't help
noticing that no one seems to ever commit to the
main branch. When
Once staging is deemed stable enough, Gama will merge it into main.
On Oct 27, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote:
2008/10/24 Cassio Pennachin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AFAIK, policies have not been changed. The messages you mention are
accurate.
I guess I don't understand the policy. I can't
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 14:21 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
Over-write? I've been doing 100% of my development in main,
based on the assumption that was the easiest, most sensible
thing to do. I certainly would not want to see my (several months)
worth of work over-written!
Surely the
2008/10/27 Cassio Pennachin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Linas,
No one is talking about overwriting your work. Follow policy and this issue
disappears.
What can I say? I get the impression that we all have
a different idea of what the policy is. If we all
agreed as to what the policy was, and
Staging is for people who want to dump their work into the project and
leave the burden of ensuring that it breaks nothing else on other
developers.
Main is for Linas, the only guy trying to actually do something useful
with the code at the moment.
When the first group of people become
2008/10/27 Cassio Pennachin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Linas,
What can I say? I get the impression that we all have
a different idea of what the policy is. If we all
agreed as to what the policy was, and actually followed it,
then we wouldn't be having this conversation. Right?
I'm not aware
Hi again,
I'll skip what has been already answered by others to try to keep this a
bit shorter.
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 17:20 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
I don't know what has been said over and over, and I
don't know what it means to say should be branching
off of staging. What should be
2008/10/27 Gustavo Machado Campagnani Gama [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 17:20 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
I don't know what has been said over and over, and I
don't know what it means to say should be branching
off of staging. What should be branching what off of
which staging,
Wow. This is really hard. I must be doing something really wrong here.
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 23:19 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
From then on, it's up to you how to merge/rebase the current changes
from main.
Wow. Its up to me?
Yes. Well, kinda. Not in the way you seem to have understood
Egads!!!
I go offline for one day and this is what happens??? ;-)
After skimming this surprisingly lengthy email thread, the situation with
these different branches and the related policies is quite clear to me,
although I hadn't really been paying attention to it before, as I'm not
actively
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, someone made a statement that Linas is the only one doing serious
work on OpenCog, or serious AGI-ish work on OpenCog. This is silly, and
completely false. Linas is doing important work, of course, and the
Hi all,
I can't help notice that some of us are working on staging and others on main.
I think this is a worse situation then just having separate branches
and rebasing and committing to main. So I'd like to clarify this...
Are we using staging for main development work, pushing to main
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 23:57 -0700, Joel Pitt wrote:
Are we using staging for main development work, pushing to main
whenever things are settled in staging?
Well, I've been following David's plan, as outlined here:
https://lists.launchpad.net/opencog-dev/msg00388.html
AFAIK, policies have not been changed. The messages you mention are
accurate.
On Oct 24, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Gustavo Machado Campagnani Gama wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 23:57 -0700, Joel Pitt wrote:
Are we using staging for main development work, pushing to main
whenever things are
14 matches
Mail list logo
