The OpenStack Foundation has already attracted over 2,000 Individual Members in
a little over a week. It's a very exciting moment for all of us involved in
this effort, but also brings responsibility for each Individual and Corporate
member.
We've learned that someone may have violated the
Hi,
The OpenStack Foundation has already attracted over 2,000 Individual Members in
a little over a week. It's a very exciting moment for all of us involved in
this effort, but also brings responsibility for each Individual and Corporate
member.
Awesome and kudos to everyone making it
Hi Atul,
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 07:21 +, Atul Jha wrote:
We've learned that someone may have violated the basic principles that
hold this community together by trying to affect the nominations for
the Individual Member elections. This is not what our community stands
for, and we do not
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 11:43 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Atul,
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 07:21 +, Atul Jha wrote:
We are also working on process improvements for nominations and
elections--more details on that coming soon. In the meantime, please
speak up or contact me or Mark
Hi Jay and Nathan,
Thank you so much for the inputs.
FYI. I've already fired a new blueprint to track this feature.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/project-specific-flavors
--
unicell
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
I know folks have started
Jonathon,
How is it possible for someone to taint the nomination process? Are we
not allowed to promote our nominations? In light of the fact that the
process is closed and we can't know how many nominations we had
received, it seems fine to me to encourage nominations. Have some
unwritten rules
On Jul 29, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Rick Clark wrote:
Jonathon,
How is it possible for someone to taint the nomination process? Are we
not allowed to promote our nominations? In light of the fact that the
process is closed and we can't know how many nominations we had
received, it seems fine to me
Thanks Jonathon,
Apparently, I missed a lot by spending yesterday taking my kids to the
movies and playing outside all day. It seems everyone else was on
Twitter.
I'm glad you are taking care of this.
Cheers,
Rick
On 07/29/2012 11:21 AM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
On Jul 29, 2012, at 10:34 AM,
Looks like a typo.
Could you try this.
That seems better...although while the documentation says that
qpid_heartbeat is Seconds between heartbeat messages [1], observed
behavior suggests that it is actually *minutes* between messages.
[1]:
On 07/29/2012 07:14 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
Looks like a typo.
Could you try this.
That seems better...although while the documentation says that
qpid_heartbeat is Seconds between heartbeat messages [1], observed
behavior suggests that it is actually *minutes* between messages.
Hey!
This might be fairly tricky to fix properly given the design of the
devstack gate. I could be wrong, it might not be terrible now that we
can release new client lib versions to PyPI more quickly. The devstack
gate explicitly tests proposed change to trunk of one project against
tip of trunk
All:
I wanted to discuss the usability of the paste config files from an operator's
point of view. The paste config files are opaque to administrators who are
trying to stand an OpenStack cloud for the first time, since they expose a lot
of implementation details about the middleware. I can
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 01:41:20AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Perhaps there is another issue with the scheduling of this?
That's likely. While I verified that the patch successfully fixed our
connection timeout issue, I didn't look closely to see exactly where
the behavior changed...and the
Title: precise_folsom_swift_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_swift_trunk/25/Project:precise_folsom_swift_trunkDate of build:Sun, 29 Jul 2012 22:01:54 -0400Build duration:1 min 49 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt
Title: precise_folsom_swift_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_swift_trunk/26/Project:precise_folsom_swift_trunkDate of build:Sun, 29 Jul 2012 22:31:53 -0400Build duration:1 min 46 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt
15 matches
Mail list logo
