Hello folks.
I started playing with Horizon and Ceilometer. I already added the
client to openstack_dashboard/api/ and added some pure data tables
(cpu/network/storage utilization) to the instance detail panel. Now I
want to have some nice graphs there, but at the moment I'm not sure
about
On 09/07/13 09:22, Christian Berendt wrote:
I gave http://www.chartjs.org/ a try and it's working fine. But I'm not
sure about the license (MIT license). Is it possible to add Chart.js to
the horizon repository? Or are there any other suggestions?
d3 is already included in horizon. At the
Monty Taylor wrote:
As per the recent TC decision around programs, the existing programs
need to provide a name, acting PTL and Mission Statement. Enjoy:
Official Title: OpenStack Infrastructure
PTL: Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
Mission Statement:
Develop and maintain the tooling
Matt Riedemann wrote:
I understand setting milestone targets for blueprints, but was wondering
what guidelines/best practices there are around setting a target
milestone for a bug? Does it mean anything, especially if there is
already a patch up in review for it?
The target milestone for
On 9 July 2013 20:12, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I thought I would get some input on a draft statement before submitting
one for the TC to vote on.
We're very focused on using OpenStack components in the delivery as much
as possible - growing the
Brooklyn Chen, Julie Pichon and others have already been putting in a lot of
effort in this area. I suggest you check out
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/ceilometer and sync up with them
if you're interested in proceeding.
- Gabriel
-Original Message-
From:
Today in the Project release status meeting we'll be looking into
havana-2 milestone (ONE week left!), as well as spend some time on
Neutron renaming progress and ongoing blueprint tracking changes.
Feel free to add extra topics to the agenda:
[1]
Hi Nachi,
I agree on the future plan.
However, dynamic loading/unloading of provider drivers will require
additional code in service plugins, I'm not sure this will be fully
supported in Havana (while I'm totally agree on implementing it)
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Nachi
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 20:21 +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
On 9 July 2013 20:12, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I thought I would get some input on a draft statement before submitting
one for the TC to vote on.
We're very focused on using OpenStack
On 09/07/13 11:11, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey
The mission statement is what we've been using for a while. The
official title is new.
Official Title: OpenStack Common Libraries
PTL: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
Mission Statement:
To produce a set of python libraries
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 11:21 +0100, Martyn Taylor wrote:
On 09/07/13 11:11, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey
The mission statement is what we've been using for a while. The
official title is new.
Official Title: OpenStack Common Libraries
PTL: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 14:15 +0200, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 05/07/13 14:26, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to explain very high level steps of our work:
1) Sync work with DB in all projects (We have what we have, let it be in
one place)
2) Refactor work with DB in one
Hi all,
There's a review up to make Horizon pass H304 (no relative imports):
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35664/
Old-style relative imports are dangerous, but I can't think of a good enough
reason to forbid new-style imports, e.g.:
from .views import IndexView
instead of
from
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey
The mission statement is what we've been using for a while. The
official title is new.
Official Title: OpenStack Common Libraries
PTL: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
Mission Statement:
To produce a
Hi,
The blueprint nova-api-validation-fw has not been approved yet.
I hope the core patch of this blueprint is merged to Havana-2,
because of completing comprehensive API validation of Nova v3 API
for Havana release. What should we do for it?
The summary of nova-api-validation-fw:
* The
Hi Mark, Nikola, David
Our work is not just in case of unifying. It improves the situation in all
project (not only in Nova).
I would like to say my opinion about DB Archiving also ;)
Let start from the problem, abstract solution, current solution, and why
this solution is ok.
*) Problem.
Hi everybody,
in UX community group on G+ popped out a need for enhancing user
experience of main navigation, because there are spreading out various
issues .
There is already created a BP for this:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/navigation-enhancement
Toshi had great idea
I have 2 openstack clusters running the Folsom release with multiple Swift
nodes. I also have a small setup that is running only Swift with a single node.
I'm noticing very large Swift I/O latencies (seconds long) on the openstack
clusters - ssbench output snippet is below. Performance is
Any reason for not just calling it OpenStack Commons?
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey
The mission statement is what we've been using for a while. The
official title is new.
Official Title: OpenStack Common Libraries
PTL: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
Mission Statement:
+1
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
The mission statement is what we've been using for a while. The
official title is new.
Official Title: OpenStack
On 07/08/2013 11:06 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2013-07-08 17:32:30 -0700:
On 07/08/2013 04:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2013-07-08 13:18:55 -0700:
On 07/01/2013 01:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
The way the new keystone-manage
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Snider, Tim tim.sni...@netapp.com wrote:
I have 2 openstack clusters running the Folsom release with multiple Swift
nodes. I also have a small setup that is running only Swift with a single
node. I’m noticing very large Swift I/O latencies (seconds long) on the
Thanks for the hint. Is there documentation on how to run keystone using apache
and multiple processes?
I'm pretty raw with python, ruby, apache ...
Thx.
From: Chmouel Boudjnah [mailto:chmo...@enovance.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 8:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re:
Hi Tim,
it's the first link on google for apache keystone :
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/keystone/apache-httpd.html
we probably want to move this to openstack-operators@
Chmouel.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Snider, Tim tim.sni...@netapp.com wrote:
Thanks for the hint. Is there
On 09/07/13 11:33 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 11:21 +0100, Martyn Taylor wrote:
On 09/07/13 11:11, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Is it worth adding some emphasis on documentation in there somewhere?
Specifically documentation for using the libraries and frameworks
offered by
One issue I have is that the panels are physically grouped and it’s very
difficult to logically re-group them. For example, the Project dashboard
explicitly lists the panel groups and the order of those panel groups. Within
each panel group, the individual panels are also explicitly listed.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Kieran Spear kisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
There's a review up to make Horizon pass H304 (no relative imports):
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35664/
Old-style relative imports are dangerous, but I can't think of a good
enough reason to forbid
Hey,
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 11:01 -0400, Monty Taylor wrote:
Hey all,
I'd like to propose an official program to the TC - refstack, a program
for verifying interoperability between implementations via FITS testing.
Official Title: OpenStack Interoperability
Initial PTL: Monty Taylor
Monty, you missed a couple of elements of the original program definition -
the mappings from the tempest based scorecard to specific versions of the
API docs, and the availability of the tested and verified endpoints to
tools ecosystem developers.
Also, I believe the definition of compliance
Hey all,
I'd like to propose an official program to the TC - refstack, a program
for verifying interoperability between implementations via FITS testing.
Official Title: OpenStack Interoperability
Initial PTL: Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
Mission Statement:
Develop and maintain FITS
The instructions for getting set up to contribute to OpenStack in general
are at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/How_To_Contribute (maybe you've
already done that, I'm not sure).
As far as this specific change goes, I would have to understand more about
what it is that you want added to give
On Tuesday, July 9, 2013, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2013-07-09 06:19:19 -0700:
On 07/08/2013 11:06 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2013-07-08 17:32:30 -0700:
On 07/08/2013 04:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Adam
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey
The mission statement is what we've been using for a while. The
official title is new.
Official Title: OpenStack Common Libraries
PTL: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
Mission Statement:
To produce a
Hi Folks,
Just wondering to what extent Heat deployment policies can be made
nova cell/AZ-aware?
For example, one could envisage a situation in which it would sense
for an autoscaling group to have cell-affinity, but also have AZ-
anti-affinity within the cell for resiliance against datacenter
How to write unit tests in keystone for the methods which are directly calling
the backend db? I understand that for testing purpose it should be a *fake db*,
but how to do that in keystone?
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On 07/09/2013 11:24 AM, Joshua McKenty wrote:
Monty, you missed a couple of elements of the original program
definition - the mappings from the tempest based scorecard to specific
versions of the API docs, and the availability of the tested and
verified endpoints to tools ecosystem
Hi all,
Just published a blueprint for some work I'm starting right now. I would
appreciate if someone can take a look and give some comments.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/campus-network
Thank you
Filipe Manco
http://about.me/fmanco
Monty Taylor wrote:
I think having an uber-triager group comprised of the small set of gate
watchers is not a terrible idea. Have the group, have that group be a
member of all the other driver groups.
FWIW you actually just need to be a bug supervisor to set priority,
which in most cases means
On 07/09/2013 10:55 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Kieran Spear kisp...@gmail.com
mailto:kisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
There's a review up to make Horizon pass H304 (no relative imports):
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35664/
Old-style
On Jul 9, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Filipe Manco filipe.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just published a blueprint for some work I'm starting right now. I would
appreciate if someone can take a look and give some comments.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/campus-network
Thank
Hi!
I just want to make sure of one thing.
The created/deleted_by has the information of the user performing the action
and user role, your examples were always a dict like {user-id: user-id,
role:role-id}. But I was looking at the identity api method
get_roles_for_user_and_domain and it
Hey everyone,
Just a quick demo of the Resource Topology. I'm working on getting it into Code
Review for Horizon either today or tomorrow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe9EM8WhLPA
Thanks!
[cid:F8A7CDE7-7AE1-42CB-A834-D228A925FF7A]
inline:
Hi All,
Here's the minutes for today's meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-09-16.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-09-16.00.txt
Log:
The reason I initiated to contribute the XSD was most of the other
components(nova, keystone, glance, etc.) have their XSD's in the
repository, so assuming they were contributed by people like me(and updated
from time to time by the same or other fellows), I would patch this XSD to
the repository.
That helped -- using tempauth instead of keystone improved performance
significantly on the openStack cluster.
However performance is still slower compared to my Swift only setup where
commands are sent directly to the swift node instead of going thru the
controller node in the openstack
Sorry for this - it went to the wrong list. I'm very embarrassed.
Thanks,
Tiago
From: Martins, Tiago
Sent: terça-feira, 9 de julho de 2013 13:50
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Created/Deleted-by Parent-data
Hi!
I just want to make sure of one thing.
The created/deleted_by has
I'm assuming you're referring to testing backend drivers as opposed to
database migrations (tests/test_sql_upgrade.py).
Backend agnostic tests land in tests/test_backend.py. Backend-specific
tests, overrides, etc belong in tests/test_backend_sql.py,
tests/test_backend_kvs.py, etc.
Generally, you
On 07/09/2013 12:20 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
I think having an uber-triager group comprised of the small set of gate
watchers is not a terrible idea. Have the group, have that group be a
member of all the other driver groups.
FWIW you actually just need to be a bug
On 07/09/2013 11:21 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Yes please! Is this something that is in development, or at least recorded
in a bug that someone like me can grab? I would love for that to be the
default behavior.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/no-tokens-in-db
Hi, I am very interested in scalabity and HA with horizon is there any
effort to provide nginx to devstack(for start) ?
Where can I join to that effort ?
I just joined to this blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-r-webscale
Any other interested ?
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-07-09 01:21:34 -0700:
How about
Develop and maintain tooling and infrastructure able to
deploy OpenStack in production, using OpenStack itself wherever
possible.
+1
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
On 07/09/2013 02:05 PM, Geronimo Orozco wrote:
Hi, I am very interested in scalabity and HA with horizon is there any
effort to provide nginx to devstack(for start) ?
I'm not sure that devstack is going to be the best place to poke at
scaling concerns or HA concerns for horizon. (the best way
Hi Monty,
I'll jump over tripleO team to see what they are doing...
My initial concern or request was to start with a minimal setting using
devstacks with nginx and load balancer if that's is not the right way to
start then I'll be very thankful on how I can start poking around that
feature
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
l...@princessleia.com wrote:
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday July 9th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Minutes and logs now available:
Minutes:
Some comments inline.
Salvatore
On 9 July 2013 21:58, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote:
Nachi,
I think that dynamic loading/preloaded modules/REST api analogs of nova
flavor is a bit too forward looking in comparison to what I'm trying to
solve right now with existing patch.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 07/09/2013 11:43 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 11:39 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hey
The
Hi folks
Replied Inline
2013/7/9 Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com:
Some comments inline.
Salvatore
On 9 July 2013 21:58, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com wrote:
Nachi,
I think that dynamic loading/preloaded modules/REST api analogs of nova
flavor is a bit too forward
Hi Kyle
I'm facing same trouble also.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33148/
[2]
http://logs.openstack.org/33148/19/check/gate-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron/1144/console.html
Thanks
Nachi
2013/7/9 Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com:
I'm currently hitting issues with a patch [1]
Also the ML2 Mechansim Driver review from Andre:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33201/
http://logs.openstack.org/33201/15/check/gate-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron/1140/console.html
Thanks,
Kyle
On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi Kyle
I'm facing same trouble
On 10/07/13 01:01, Monty Taylor wrote:
Hey all,
I'd like to propose an official program to the TC - refstack, a program
for verifying interoperability between implementations via FITS testing.
Official Title: OpenStack Interoperability
Initial PTL: Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
Mission
On 07/08/2013 05:18 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/01/2013 01:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
The way the new keystone-manage command token_flush works right now
is quite broken by MySQL and InnoDB's gap locking behavior:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/1188378
Presumably other SQL databases like
On 2013-07-09 22:01:15 + (+), Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
I'm currently hitting issues with a patch [1] not passing Jenkins
due to a Horizon python-keystonclient dependency issue in no way
related to my change.
[...]
It should be resolved shortly (the change is in the gate pipeline
On 09/07/13 11:59 -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Hi Folks,
Just wondering to what extent Heat deployment policies can be made
nova cell/AZ-aware?
For example, one could envisage a situation in which it would sense
for an autoscaling group to have cell-affinity, but also have AZ-
anti-affinity
On 2013-07-09 23:55:03 + (+), Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
Thanks for the note Jeremy! Can you shoot another reply on this
thread so those of us with patches failing can resubmit?
Yep, now that https://review.openstack.org/36349 has merged you
should be safe to recheck any proposed
On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:37 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
We have two suboption for db api based solution
Option4. REST API + DB with Preload with Conf
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1v0nLTEsFOwWeYpYjpw4qe3QHB5lLZEE_b0TmmR5b7ic/edit#slide=id.gf14b7b30_00
so IMO, we can drop
On 07/09/2013 07:42 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 09/07/13 11:59 -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Hi Folks,
Just wondering to what extent Heat deployment policies can be made
nova cell/AZ-aware?
For example, one could envisage a situation in which it would sense
for an autoscaling group to have
Hi Mark
2013/7/9 Mark McClain mark.mccl...@dreamhost.com:
On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:37 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
We have two suboption for db api based solution
Option4. REST API + DB with Preload with Conf
Just a reminder, we have our weekly ML2 sub team meeting Wednesday at 1400UTC.
The agenda is on the meeting page here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ML2
We have a number of ML2 related blueprints in review with a hope of getting
them in for H2 tomorrow, we'll focus on those in the
On Jul 9, 2013, at 8:40 PM, Filipe Manco filipe.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kyle
I already looked at the blueprints and I want to integrate my work with ML2,
mainly because I want users to able to keep the traditional networking models
working in parallel (and I think ML2 is the best way
nice jobs!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2013-07-09 23:55:03 + (+), Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
Thanks for the note Jeremy! Can you shoot another reply on this
thread so those of us with patches failing can resubmit?
Yep, now that
On 10 July 2013 00:55, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Kieran Spear kisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
There's a review up to make Horizon pass H304 (no relative imports):
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35664/
Old-style relative imports are
Thanks Kyle,
I'm unfortunately going to be on a plane during tomorrow's meeting, so
wanted to send a quick update on the ML2 mechanism driver infrastructure (
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-mechanism-drivers).
Thanks to everyone for the latest rounds of review, I believe that
On 10 July 2013 02:31, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 07/09/2013 10:55 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Kieran Spear kisp...@gmail.com
mailto:kisp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
There's a review up to make Horizon pass H304 (no relative imports):
I will join you. Thanks!
Filipe Manco
http://about.me/fmanco
2013/7/10 Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com
On Jul 9, 2013, at 8:40 PM, Filipe Manco filipe.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kyle
I already looked at the blueprints and I want to integrate my work with
ML2, mainly because
74 matches
Mail list logo
