On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 08/22/2016 08:08 AM, Honza Pokorny wrote:
>>
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing.
>> Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're
>>
On 08/22/2016 08:08 AM, Honza Pokorny wrote:
Hello folks,
We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing.
Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're
wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice.
Would 3000 conflict with any other services? Is
On 22.8.2016 08:08, Honza Pokorny wrote:
Hello folks,
We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing.
Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're
wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice.
Would 3000 conflict with any other services? Is
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Honza Pokorny wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing.
> Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're
> wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice.
>
> Would 3000
On 22/08/16 08:08, Honza Pokorny wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing.
> Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're
> wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice.
>
> Would 3000 conflict with any other services?
Hello folks,
We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing.
Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're
wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice.
Would 3000 conflict with any other services? Is there a better option?
Thanks
Honza Pokorny