[openstack-dev] [First Contact] SIG PTG Summary

Hello Everyone! The first half of the week was particularly busy and I know a lot of people wanted to come to the First Contact SIG room that could not, or couldn’t be there for the whole time. So! For those of you interested that maybe couldn’t make it for the whole time, here is a beautiful

[openstack-dev] [heat] We need more help for actions and review. And some PTG update for Heat

Dear all As we reach Stein and start to discuss what we should do in the next cycle, I would like to raise voice for what kind of help we need and what target we planning. BTW, If you really can't start your contact with us with any English (we don't mind any English skill you are) *First of

[openstack-dev] [keystone] noop role in openstack

For Adam's benefit continuing this a bit in email: regarding the noop role: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-keystone/%23openstack-keystone.2018-09-20.log.html#t2018-09-20T04:13:43 The first benefit of such a role (in the given policy scenario) is that you can now give a user

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: Denver Ops Meetup post-mortem

Hello! On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:36 PM Chris Morgan wrote: > > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Chris Morgan > Date: Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:13 PM > Subject: Denver Ops Meetup post-mortem > To: OpenStack Operators > > > Hello All, > Last week we had a successful Ops Meetup

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] When can/should we change additionalProperties=False in GET /servers(/detail)?

On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 02:26:30 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > On 9/17/2018 9:41 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:33:30 +0900 Alex Xu wrote > > > > > That only means after 599276 we only have servers API and > > os-instance-action API stopped

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][i18n][ptg] Stein PTG Summary

Thanks a lot for nice summary on Docs part especially! I would like to add an additional summary with more context from I18n perspective. Note: I mainly participated in Docs/I18n discussion only on Monday & Tuesday (not available during Wed - Fri due to conflicts with other work in my country),

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

On 2018-09-18 08:40 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2018-09-18 11:26:57 +0900 (+0900), Ghanshyam Mann wrote: [...] I can understand that IRC cannot be used in China which is very painful and mostly it is used weChat. [...] I have yet to hear anyone provide first-hand confirmation that access to

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Nominating Ian Y. Choi for openstack-doc-core

+1 > 在 2018年9月20日，上午2:50，Petr Kovar 写道： > > Hi all, > > Based on our PTG discussion, I'd like to nominate Ian Y. Choi for > membership in the openstack-doc-core team. I think Ian doesn't need an > introduction, he's been around for a while, recently being deeply involved > in infra work to get

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] [infra] [qa] tuning some zuul jobs from "it works" to "proper"

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 11:11:12AM +0900, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 23:29:46 +0900 Monty Taylor > wrote > > On 09/19/2018 09:23 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > > On 09/19/2018 08:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > >> > > >> I have a patch in progress to add some simple

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] [infra] [qa] tuning some zuul jobs from "it works" to "proper"

On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 23:29:46 +0900 Monty Taylor wrote > On 09/19/2018 09:23 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 09/19/2018 08:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > >> > >> I have a patch in progress to add some simple integration tests to > >> placement: > >> > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: Denver Ops Meetup post-mortem

Thanks for the thorough write-up as well as the detailed feedback. I'm including some of my notes from the Ops Meetup Feedback session just a bit below, as well as some comments inline. One of the critical things that would help both the Ops and Dev community is to have a holistic sense of

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposed Changes to the Core Team ...

All, In the last year we have had some changes to Core team participation.  This was a topic of discussion at the PTG in Denver last week.  Based on that discussion I have reached out to John Griffith and Winston D (Huang Zhiteng) and asked if they felt they could continue to be a part of the

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators][horizon] Dashboard memory leaks

Hi All, Recently, we found the server which hosts horizon dashboard had serveral times OOM caused by horizon services. After restarting the dashboard, the memory usage goes up very quickly if we access /project/network_topology/ path. *How to reproduce* Login into the dashboard and go to

[openstack-dev] [docs][i18n][ptg] Stein PTG Summary

Hi all, Just wanted to share a summary of docs- and i18n-related meetings and discussions we had in Denver last week during the Stein Project Teams Gathering. The overall schedule for all our sessions with additional comments and meeting minutes can be found here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

A quick sidenote for anyone is using riot.im but not super familiar with it like I did ... Its global search could not cache all the openstack channels, therefore you have to manually join them via their own cmd lines as I recently discover the methods .. 1. add @appservice-irc:matrix.org for

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

On 9/19/2018 2:45 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Another one we need to make a decision on is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1783405 Which I'm suggesting we need to mark more slow tests with the actual "slow" tag in Tempest so they move to only be run in the tempest-slow job. gmann and

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Nominating Ian Y. Choi for openstack-doc-core

Excerpts from Petr Kovar's message of 2018-09-19 11:50:22 -0700: > Hi all, > > Based on our PTG discussion, I'd like to nominate Ian Y. Choi for > membership in the openstack-doc-core team. I think Ian doesn't need an > introduction, he's been around for a while, recently being deeply involved >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

On 9/19/2018 2:11 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: Unfortunately, right now our classification rate is very poor (only 15%), which makes it difficult to know what exactly is causing these failures. Mriedem and I have quickly scanned the unclassified list, and it appears there is a db migration testing

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Nominating Ian Y. Choi for openstack-doc-core

Also not a docs core, but fully support this nomination! Michael On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:25 PM Jay S Bryant wrote: > > > > On 9/19/2018 1:50 PM, Petr Kovar wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Based on our PTG discussion, I'd like to nominate Ian Y. Choi for > > membership in the openstack-doc-core

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Core status

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 06:19:44PM +, Gary Kotton wrote: > I have recently transitioned to a new role where I will be working on other > parts of OpenStack. Sadly I do not have the necessary cycles to maintain my > core responsibilities in the neutron community. Nonetheless I will continue

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Nominating Ian Y. Choi for openstack-doc-core

On 9/19/2018 1:50 PM, Petr Kovar wrote: Hi all, Based on our PTG discussion, I'd like to nominate Ian Y. Choi for membership in the openstack-doc-core team. I think Ian doesn't need an introduction, he's been around for a while, recently being deeply involved in infra work to get us robust

[openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

Hello everyone, You may have noticed there is a large Zuul job backlog and changes are not getting CI reports as quickly as you might expect. There are several factors interacting with each other to make this the case. The short version is that one of our clouds is performing upgrades and has

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Nominating Ian Y. Choi for openstack-doc-core

On 2018-09-19 20:50, Petr Kovar wrote: Hi all, Based on our PTG discussion, I'd like to nominate Ian Y. Choi for membership in the openstack-doc-core team. I think Ian doesn't need an introduction, he's been around for a while, recently being deeply involved in infra work to get us robust

[openstack-dev] [docs] Nominating Ian Y. Choi for openstack-doc-core

Hi all, Based on our PTG discussion, I'd like to nominate Ian Y. Choi for membership in the openstack-doc-core team. I think Ian doesn't need an introduction, he's been around for a while, recently being deeply involved in infra work to get us robust support for project team docs translation and

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators][neutron][fwaas] Removing FWaaS V1 in Stein

All, With the Stein release we will remove support for FWaaS V1 [1]. It has been marked deprecated since Liberty (2015) and was an experimental API. It is being replaced with FWaaS V2 [2] which has been available since the Newton release. What is Neutron FWaaS? Firewall-as-a-Service is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [User-committee] [tc] Joint UC/TC Meeting

Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2018-09-19 12:31:26 +0100: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > [Redirecting this from the openstack-tc list to the -dev list.] > > Excerpts from Melvin Hillsman's message of 2018-09-18 17:43:57 -0500: > >> UC is proposing a joint UC/TC meeting

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Core status

Hi, I have recently transitioned to a new role where I will be working on other parts of OpenStack. Sadly I do not have the necessary cycles to maintain my core responsibilities in the neutron community. Nonetheless I will continue to be involved. Thanks Gary

[openstack-dev] [senlin] Senlin Monthly(ish) Newsletter Sep 2018

HTML: https://dkt26111.wordpress.com/2018/09/19/senlin-monthlyish-newsletter-september-2018/ This is the inaugural Senlin monthly(ish) newsletter. The goal of the newsletter is to highlight happenings in the Senlin project. If you have any feedback or questions regarding the contents, please

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [all] Consistent policy names

johnsom (from octavia) had a good idea, which was to use the service types that are defined already [0]. I like this for three reasons, specifically. First, it's already a known convention for services that we can just reuse. Second, it includes a spacing convention (e.g. load-balancer vs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Removing external_bridge_name config option

Hi, I would like to share some information to help the migration from external_network_bridge. The background of the deprecation is described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1491668 I also shared a slide to explain the detail.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

Regarding some web clients that are potentially useful https://webchat.freenode.net/ - Zane mentioned this already and I can say I tried/used it some time ago until I opted for CLI/alternatives https://riot.im (iOS and Android apps available along with online client) - i find it a bit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

On 18/09/18 9:10 PM, Jaesuk Ahn wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:30 AM Zane Bitter > wrote: Resotring the whole quote here because I accidentally sent the original to the -sigs list only and not the -dev list. As others have mentioned, I think this is diving into

Re: [openstack-dev] Nominating Tetsuro Nakamura for placement-core

On 9/19/2018 10:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: I'd like to nominate Tetsuro Nakamura for membership in the placement-core team. Throughout placement's development Tetsuro has provided quality reviews; done the hard work of creating rigorous functional tests, making them fail, and fixing them; and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Super fun unshelve image_ref bugs

On 12/1/2017 2:47 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Andrew Laski also mentioned in IRC that we didn't replace the original instance.image_ref with the shelved image id because the shelve operation should be transparent to the end user, they have the same image (not really), same volumes, same IPs, etc

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][edge] Notes from the PTG

On 09/19/2018 11:03 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Jim Rollenhagen > wrote: Tuesday: edge Since cdent asked in IRC, when we talk about edge and far edge, we defined these roughly like this:

Re: [openstack-dev] Nominating Tetsuro Nakamura for placement-core

On 09/19/2018 11:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: I'd like to nominate Tetsuro Nakamura for membership in the placement-core team. Throughout placement's development Tetsuro has provided quality reviews; done the hard work of creating rigorous functional tests, making them fail, and fixing them; and

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Berlin Forum Proposals

On 19/09, Jay S Bryant wrote: > Gorka, > > Oh man!  Sorry for the duplication.  I will update the link on the Forum > page if you are able to move your content over.  Think it will confused > people less if we use the page I most recently sent out.  Does that make > sense? > Hi Jay, Yup, it makes

Re: [openstack-dev] Nominating Tetsuro Nakamura for placement-core

+1 On 09/19/2018 10:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > > I'd like to nominate Tetsuro Nakamura for membership in the > placement-core team. Throughout placement's development Tetsuro has > provided quality reviews; done the hard work of creating rigorous > functional tests, making them fail, and

Re: [openstack-dev] Nominating Tetsuro Nakamura for placement-core

On Sep 19, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > I'd like to nominate Tetsuro Nakamura for membership in the > placement-core team. I’m not a core, but if I were, I’d +1 that. -- Ed Leafe __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Berlin Forum Proposals

Gorka, Oh man!  Sorry for the duplication.  I will update the link on the Forum page if you are able to move your content over.  Think it will confused people less if we use the page I most recently sent out.  Does that make sense? Thanks for catching this mistake! Jay On 9/19/2018 4:42

[openstack-dev] Nominating Tetsuro Nakamura for placement-core

I'd like to nominate Tetsuro Nakamura for membership in the placement-core team. Throughout placement's development Tetsuro has provided quality reviews; done the hard work of creating rigorous functional tests, making them fail, and fixing them; and implemented some of the complex

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][edge] Notes from the PTG

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > Tuesday: edge > Since cdent asked in IRC, when we talk about edge and far edge, we defined these roughly like this: https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/NunkkS2y/edge_architecture1.JPG // jim

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] [infra] [qa] tuning some zuul jobs from "it works" to "proper"

On 09/19/2018 09:37 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, at 4:23 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 09/19/2018 08:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: also, cmurphy has been working on updating some of keystone's legacy jobs recently: https://review.openstack.org/602452 which might also be a

[openstack-dev] [ironic][edge] Notes from the PTG

I wrote up some notes from my perspective at the PTG for some internal teams and figured I may as well share them here. They're primarily from the ironic and edge WG rooms. Fairly raw, very long, but hopefully useful to someone. Enjoy. Tuesday: edge Edge WG (IMHO) has historically just talked

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] When can/should we change additionalProperties=False in GET /servers(/detail)?

On 9/18/2018 12:26 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/17/2018 9:41 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:   On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:33:30 +0900 Alex Xu wrote   > That only means after 599276 we only have servers API and os-instance-action API stopped accepting the undefined query parameter.   > What

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] [infra] [qa] tuning some zuul jobs from "it works" to "proper"

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, at 4:23 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 09/19/2018 08:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > > also, cmurphy has been working on updating some of keystone's legacy > jobs recently: > > https://review.openstack.org/602452 > > which might also be a source for copying from. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] [infra] [qa] tuning some zuul jobs from "it works" to "proper"

On 09/19/2018 09:23 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 09/19/2018 08:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: I have a patch in progress to add some simple integration tests to placement: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/601614/ They use https://github.com/cdent/gabbi-tempest . The idea is that the method for

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] [infra] [qa] tuning some zuul jobs from "it works" to "proper"

On 09/19/2018 08:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: I have a patch in progress to add some simple integration tests to placement:     https://review.openstack.org/#/c/601614/ They use https://github.com/cdent/gabbi-tempest . The idea is that the method for adding more tests is to simply add more yaml

[openstack-dev] [chef] fog-openstack 0.3

Ohai! fog-openstack 0.3 has been released upstream, but it also seems to be a breaking release by way of naming convention. At this time, it is advised to pin your client cookbook at '<0.3.0'. Changes to compensate for this change are being delivered to git and Supermarket, but the most

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Removing external_bridge_name config option

Hi, Some time ago I proposed patch [1] to remove config option „external_network_bridge”. This option was deprecated to removal in Ocata so I think it’s time to get rid of it finally. There is quite many projects which still uses this option [2]. I will try to propose patches for those

[openstack-dev] [cyborg] Weekly meeting canceled for this week

Hi team, The Cyborg weekly meeting today is canceled as most of the folks in China are still fighting with jet lag from Denver. -- Thank you Regards Li __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [placement] [infra] [qa] tuning some zuul jobs from "it works" to "proper"

I have a patch in progress to add some simple integration tests to placement: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/601614/ They use https://github.com/cdent/gabbi-tempest . The idea is that the method for adding more tests is to simply add more yaml in gate/gabbits, without needing to worry

Re: [openstack-dev] Forum Topic Submission Period

Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le mer. 19 sept. 2018 à 00:41, Jimmy McArthur > a écrit : SNIP Same as I do :-) Unrelated point, for the first time in all the Summits I know, I wasn't able to know the track chairs for a specific track. Ideally, I'd love to reach them

[openstack-dev] [Searchlight] vPTG tomorrow

Hi team, As we agreed on team's channel, tomorrow we will have our vPTG for Stein. Please see below for details: - Time: 12:00~14:00 UTC, 20th Sep. - Meeting channel: https://hangouts.google.com/group/7PeiryADgQvyweoF3 - Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/searchlight-stein-ptg

Re: [openstack-dev] [User-committee] [tc] Joint UC/TC Meeting

On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Doug Hellmann wrote: [Redirecting this from the openstack-tc list to the -dev list.] Excerpts from Melvin Hillsman's message of 2018-09-18 17:43:57 -0500: UC is proposing a joint UC/TC meeting at the end of the month say starting after Berlin to work more closely together.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] Are we ready to put stable/ocata into extended maintenance mode?

On 9/18/18 9:27 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: The release page says Ocata is planned to go into extended maintenance mode on Aug 27 [1]. There really isn't much to this except it means we don't do releases for Ocata anymore [2]. There is a caveat that project teams that do not wish to maintain

Re: [openstack-dev] GUI for Swift object storage

Hi Tim - Thanks for sharing the details. Thanks Swami On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:05 PM Tim Burke wrote: > > Hate to nitpick, but Cyberduck is licensed GPLv3 -- you can browse the source > (and confirm the license) at https://trac.cyberduck.io/browser/trunk and > https://trac.cyberduck.io/

Re: [openstack-dev] GUI for Swift object storage

Hi Clay - Thanks for sharing the details. On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:09 PM Clay Gerrard wrote: > > I don't know about a good open source cross-platform GUI client, but the > SwiftStack one is slick and doesn't seem to be behind a paywall (yet?) > > https://www.swiftstack.com/downloads > > There's

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg][cinder] Stein PTG Summary Page Ready ...

On 18/09, Jay S Bryant wrote: > Team, > > I have put together the following page with a summary of all our discussions > at the PTG: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderSteinPTGSummary > > Please review the contents and let me know if anything needs to be changed. > > Jay > > Hi Jay, Thank you

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Berlin Forum Proposals

On 18/09, Jay S Bryant wrote: > Team, > > I have created an etherpad for our Forum Topic Planning: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-berlin-forum-proposals > > Please add your ideas to the etherpad.  Thank you! > > Jay > Hi Jay, After our last IRC meeting, a couple of weeks ago, I

Re: [openstack-dev] Forum Topic Submission Period

Le mer. 19 sept. 2018 à 00:41, Jimmy McArthur a écrit : > Hey Matt, > > > Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > > Just a process question. > > Good question. > > I submitted a presentation for the normal marketing blitz part of the > > summit which wasn't accepted (I'm still dealing with this emotionally,