On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Robert Vineyard viney...@tuffmail.com wrote:
On 5/19/2012 7:43 PM, Outback Dingo wrote:
Just reinstalled my development environment, once i get the WRT sources
pulled down ill get on this and test it, if its good ill commit it for
you. sometime later this
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Philip Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
We talked about how this could be improved... we're more than a year down the
road, and I'm not seeing much difference.
Maybe we need to talk about this more?
Or try harder?
One thing Ive noticed
On 21/05/12 14:41, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Philip Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
We talked about how this could be improved... we're more than a year down
the road, and I'm not seeing much difference.
Maybe we need to talk about this
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:52 AM, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote:
On 21/05/12 14:41, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Philip Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
We talked about how this could be improved... we're more than a year down
the road, and
On 21/05/12 15:16, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:52 AM, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote:
On 21/05/12 14:41, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Philip Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
We talked about how this could be improved...
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:19 AM, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote:
On 21/05/12 15:16, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:52 AM, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org wrote:
On 21/05/12 14:41, Outback Dingo wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Philip Prindeville
Hi all,
currently we test our last left-for-testing xDSL interface. The Danube
tries to synchronise but without result. Might be a SW problem of the
OpenWRT trunk version we use. Our HW is totally identical to that of
Lantiq's RDK. We've also used the add-on front-end of Lantiq's RDK in
the
Hi,
we already posted some job announcements in this mailing list (and in the
forum) some time ago and we received some interesting replies.
We are further expanding our staff and we have new job opportunities.
Following you can find the request (in Italian because the request is related
to a
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:48 +0200, Spyridon Tompros wrote:
Hi all,
currently we test our last left-for-testing xDSL interface. The Danube
tries to synchronise but without result. Might be a SW problem of the
OpenWRT trunk version we use. Our HW is totally identical to that of
Lantiq's
On 21/05/12 17:48, Spyridon Tompros wrote:
Hi all,
currently we test our last left-for-testing xDSL interface. The Danube
tries to synchronise but without result. Might be a SW problem of the
OpenWRT trunk version we use. Our HW is totally identical to that of
Lantiq's RDK. We've also used
I applied your patch
https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/31837
Saverio
2012/5/17 Moritz Warning moritzwarn...@web.de:
On 05/17/2012 09:56 AM, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
Hello,
please can you resend to me the patch as attachment ? my email client
mangled the patch.
I will review it
On 21/05/2012 18:14, Conor O'Gorman wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:48 +0200, Spyridon Tompros wrote:
Hi all,
currently we test our last left-for-testing xDSL interface. The Danube
tries to synchronise but without result. Might be a SW problem of the
OpenWRT trunk version we use. Our HW is
On 21/05/2012 18:16, John Crispin wrote:
On 21/05/12 17:48, Spyridon Tompros wrote:
Hi all,
currently we test our last left-for-testing xDSL interface. The Danube
tries to synchronise but without result. Might be a SW problem of the
OpenWRT trunk version we use. Our HW is totally identical to
Rick Jones wrote:
On 05/20/2012 08:48 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
Thx for the numbers!
Could you do a TCP_RR while under load from UDP_STREAM?
If you want to generate pretty pictures while doing so, you can
probably tweak
http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/doc/examples/bloat.sh
How
For the past few days, I've been updating to the latest SVN code, and I'm
seeing that when I try to login to luci, I get a failed username/password.
I can ssh to the router (pubkey authentication), but changing the root
password doesn't affect my ability to login to the web interface.
I have
Rick Jones wrote:
On 05/21/2012 02:49 PM, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
Rick Jones wrote:
On 05/20/2012 08:48 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
Thx for the numbers!
Could you do a TCP_RR while under load from UDP_STREAM?
If you want to generate pretty pictures while doing so, you can
probably tweak
Wouter van Gulik wrote:
On 05/20/2012 12:00 PM, openwrt-devel-requ...@lists.openwrt.org wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 22:28:57 +0200
From: Tobias Diedrichranma+open...@tdiedrich.de
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] swconfig: List available
Hi,
On 05/22/2012 12:52 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
For the past few days, I've been updating to the latest SVN code, and I'm
seeing that when I try to login to luci, I get a failed username/password.
I can ssh to the router (pubkey authentication), but changing the root
password doesn't
On Tue, 22 May 2012 01:14:07 +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
Looks liks the password isn't actually stored in the shadow file, but
only in passwd, while current libs only check against shadow. You have
to enable shadow support in busybox for the passwd command to store the
password to shadow.
On Mon, 21 May 2012 23:23:21 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
Recompiling now and will follow-up and let the list know if that took
care of it.
That did, once I remembered that since I enabled shadow passwords, I had
to actually reset the password. :)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic
In looking over your test scripts and results, it seems possible you
have gso on.
ethtool -K the_device tso off
ethtool -K the_device gso off
ethtool -K the_device ufo off
Secondly, in the 100Mbit and below case, I have found BQL's estimates
to be persistently on the high side, and have
I would really like people to clearly mark when they are using pfifo_fast,
codel, and fq_codel.
Secondly, I note that for utterly best results it is useful to ALSO have
htb on on ingress to a value only slightly lower than the rate under
test, and fq_codel attached to
the bin(s)
(an example of
22 matches
Mail list logo
