Reviewer: Wesley Eddy
Review result: Ready
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them
On 1/17/2024 3:34 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
[Med] This can be part of regular code updates. Please note that this
is not unusual in ipfix (see for example ipv4Options, natevent, etc.
in https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml which depend on
an IANA registry).
Ok; do
On 1/16/2024 11:10 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Are you expecting the implementation to have an exhaustive list of all
of the ExIDs in use to understand the difference between 2 and 4 byte
usage?
*/[Med] Yes because otherwise an implem can’t unambiguously identify
and extract
The changes look good to me; I just want to make sure you understand one
of my questions that doesn't look like it was clear enough:
On 1/15/2024 4:13 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
- The way an implementation understands the TCP ExIDs may benefit
from slightly more explanation:
--
Reviewer: Wesley Eddy
Review result: Ready with Issues
Comments:
- The document is well-written and easy to read.
- Section 6 is really nice and helpful!
Issues:
- The way an implementation understands the TCP ExIDs may benefit from slightly
more explanation:
-- In 4.2 and 4.3, is the idea
Reviewer: Wesley Eddy
Review result: Ready with Issues
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG
Your response all sounds good to me, thanks.
On 4/1/2021 3:14 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Hi Wes,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
...
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Reviewer: Wesley Eddy
Review result: Almost Ready
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG
