Re: [OPSAWG] New I-D -> Guidelines for Charactering "OAM"

2024-01-16 Thread Carlos Pignataro
Dear Greg, Thank you for your interest in our draft, and the associated extensive comments! All welcome! *CMP: Please find some additional follow-ups.* On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 7:52 PM Greg Mirsky wrote: > Hi Adrian, > thank you for your kind consideration of my notes. Please find my >

Re: [OPSAWG] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-05

2024-01-16 Thread Wesley Eddy
On 1/16/2024 11:10 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: Are you expecting the implementation to have an exhaustive list of all of the ExIDs in use to understand the difference between 2 and 4 byte usage? */[Med] Yes because otherwise an implem can’t unambiguously identify and extract

Re: [OPSAWG] [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-03

2024-01-16 Thread to...@strayalpha.com
I’d actually like to suggest this doc avoid repeating information in other docs, notably the UDP options spec. In particular: - there is no need to replicate Fig 1 - there is no need to replicate the definitions of SAFE or UNSAFE All these things can be “as defined in X”. That avoids any issues

Re: [OPSAWG] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-05

2024-01-16 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Wes, Please see inline. Cheers, Med De : Wesley Eddy Envoyé : mardi 16 janvier 2024 16:09 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; tsv-...@ietf.org Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org Objet : Re: Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-05 The

Re: [OPSAWG] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-05

2024-01-16 Thread Wesley Eddy
The changes look good to me; I just want to make sure you understand one of my questions that doesn't look like it was clear enough: On 1/15/2024 4:13 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: - The way an implementation understands the TCP ExIDs may benefit from slightly more explanation: --

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-06.txt

2024-01-16 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-06.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF. Title: Export of UDP Options Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Authors: Mohamed Boucadair

Re: [OPSAWG] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-03

2024-01-16 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Joe, Thanks for the follow-up. Please see inline. Cheers, Med De : to...@strayalpha.com Envoyé : lundi 15 janvier 2024 17:17 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET Cc : int-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org Objet : Re: Intdir early review of

Re: [OPSAWG] Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-03

2024-01-16 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Tommy, Thanks for clarifying. You have a valid point. Updated the type to point to unsigned256, which is now defined in draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Tommy Pauly > Envoyé : lundi 15 janvier 2024 15:06 > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed