On 01/31/2018 09:42 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:13:26AM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> On 01/31/2018 09:02 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In the gluster maintainers meeting last week, one of the topics touched
>>> upon was, should we build CentOS6 client
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:13:26AM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 01/31/2018 09:02 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the gluster maintainers meeting last week, one of the topics touched
> > upon was, should we build CentOS6 client packages for 4.0?
> >
> > The reasoning
On 01/31/2018 09:13 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 01/31/2018 09:02 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the gluster maintainers meeting last week, one of the topics touched
>> upon was, should we build CentOS6 client packages for 4.0?
>>
>> The reasoning being, upgrading servers to 4.0
On 01/31/2018 09:02 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the gluster maintainers meeting last week, one of the topics touched
> upon was, should we build CentOS6 client packages for 4.0?
>
> The reasoning being, upgrading servers to 4.0 requires moving from
> CentOS6 (for installations on
Hi,
In the gluster maintainers meeting last week, one of the topics touched
upon was, should we build CentOS6 client packages for 4.0?
The reasoning being, upgrading servers to 4.0 requires moving from
CentOS6 (for installations on this base OS version) to CentOS7 and then
moving to 4.0 bits on
Hi all,
GlusterD2 v4.0rc0 has been tagged and a release made in anticipation
of GlusterFS-v4.0rc0. The release and source tarballs are available
from [1].
There aren't any sepcific release-notes for this release.
Thanks.
~kaushal
[1]: https://github.com/gluster/glusterd2/releases/tag/v4.0rc0
