Perhaps you've already written code that uses linked lists, but in case you
haven't, let me ask: why do you need them? Why not manipulate the data
directly in the databases? This type of access is marginally slower, but if
I understand the purpose of your application, the difference shouldn't be
It's certainly possible to save your linked lists in a database, but the
only method I know of is quite tedious. If you like, I'll write it up for
you; otherwise, perhaps someone has a neat trick for doing this.
Er... as you can see, I went ahead and did just that; this paragraph
should've
--- In Jeremy Neal Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's certainly possible to save your linked lists in a database,
but the only method I know of is quite tedious. If you like,
I'll write it up for you; otherwise, perhaps someone has a neat
trick for doing this.
Er... as you can see, I
--- Jeremy Neal Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps you've already written code that uses linked lists,
but in case you haven't, let me ask: why do you need them?
Why not manipulate the data directly in the databases? This
type of access is marginally slower, but if I understand the
Hi,
Thanks for your good advice. I am completely ignorant of VFS
(still focusing on OS 3.5+ support at this time).
How would it help the user if I supported VFS?
Also, I intend to support OS3.5+ and I guess that I'll still
need a Dm-conversant layer in there, like you did.
Thx!
Alex
Hal
I think Hal's point (and it's one I agree with) is that rather
than have your interface code work directly with the database and
record calls that you wrap the database in a module that exposes
the objects in an abstract way. I've got into the habit of doing this
with every database - you end up
alexrousseau_jta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I forgot to ask: When you say marginally slower, is it
still fast enough to load a 2-bit-depth 160x160 bitmap
in 250ms or less?
I'm glad to be of service! As for the 'slowness', my (rough) understanding
is that it has
Hal Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 21:46 + 7/11/03, alexrousseau_jta wrote:
How would it help the user if I supported VFS?
More memory (probably more important for you than for most apps,
since I can see this becoming graphics-heavy). And easier
exchange (here Fred, take a look
Jeremy Neal Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
alexrousseau_jta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I forgot to ask: When you say marginally slower, is it
still fast enough to load a 2-bit-depth 160x160 bitmap
in 250ms or less?
I'm glad to be of service! As for the
Hi,
title says it all, though cryptically perhaps.
I am writing a mini storyboarding application and am
about to embark on the persistence part of the project.
And I need some advice on how to structure my db(s?)
for this.
So far, I have structured my data as follows:
- the db will contain 0,
10 matches
Mail list logo
