Hi,
I already have an established reader that reads in our bespoke format
and converts it to a vtkUnstructuredGrids so that I can view it in
Paraview. Furthermore a filter then reads in a solution file in a
bespoke format and shows the cell data from the CFD solution. This works
great, happy
Hi,
You haven't configured your output, assuming rectilinear grid you need
to set the extent and provide coordinate arrays.
You are indexing a point based array with cell based index, so the
lookup you make into vtkVarray is incorrect. 'Extent' tells you the
number of cells, not the number
Hello Listserve,
I have three data sets of 3D scalar images in *.vtk files that I would like
to show cut planes through simultaneously. All these scalars have different
value ranges. However, I need to show the data sets and the value ranges
simultaneously for all three data sets.
From reading
You can use the calculator filter to call it a different name.
Regards,
Paul
On 28 Oct 2011 18:22, Nick Rubert ncrub...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Listserve,
I have three data sets of 3D scalar images in *.vtk files that I would like
to show cut planes through simultaneously. All these scalars
Hi,
I have some Exodus files with complex-values on unstructured grids.
The complex values are represented as vectors of size 2. By default,
ParaView shows the Magntite of the vectors (equals the absolute
value of the complex number).
What I would like to have is a threshold plot of where the
The ParaView team is pleased to announce the availability of the ParaView
3.12.0 Release Candidate 3 binaries for download on the ParaView (
http://paraview.org/paraview/resources/software.html). ParaView 3.12 can be
considered as a bug-fix release with over 180 issues resolved. The detailed
list
Hi,
Thanks for your help both of you.
Cheers for pointing out my Cell-Point mistake Burlen, I actually am
increasing my extents (extent[1]+1 for example) to compensate for this, but
I did make a mistake in my final call
*out.GetCellData().AddArray(newArray)*
*
*
which should be getting
I actually am increasing my extents (extent[1]+1 for example) to
compensate for this,
yes you added one. that is needed to compute the number of cells from
the extents. you still need to add one to the result (the number of
cells) to get the number of points. As is, you are not looking up the