Re: [Paraview] [Paraview-developers] ANN: ParaView 3.98.0, Release Candidate 1 now available for download

2012-11-09 Thread Biddiscombe, John A.
Seems like tooltips have been removed for sources/filters/etc. Intentional or accident? I couldn't find an option to turn them on. JB From: paraview-developers-boun...@paraview.org [mailto:paraview-developers-boun...@paraview.org] On Behalf Of Utkarsh Ayachit Sent: 07 November 2012 20:40 To:

[Paraview] Mesh Quality

2012-11-09 Thread Fastl, Thomas
Dear Madam/Sir, I am a student at Graz University of Technology starting with Paraview 3.10.1 and came up with a question I can not answer myself. I am using the Filter called 'Mesh Quality' with the 'Scaled Jacobian' option for hexahedral elements. I have some elements which have only six

Re: [Paraview] ANN: ParaView 3.98.0, Release Candidate 1 now available for download

2012-11-09 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
Folks, The ParaView 3.98.0, RC1 binaries for Linux 32-bit and Mountain Lion (10.8) are now available for download at on http://paraview.org/paraview/resources/software.php. Utkarsh On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com wrote: Folks, In preparation of

[Paraview] Bug with 4.7.2 build and 3.14.1

2012-11-09 Thread Andrew Parker
Hi, I get this error building a fresh clone of 3.14.1 using gcc 4.7.2, vtk build and works perfectly fine with this compiler so I presume it's a slight change in ordering that has caused the problem.: [ 30%] Building CXX object VTK/Rendering/CMakeFiles/vtkRendering.dir/vtkFreeTypeUtilities.cxx.o

Re: [Paraview] Bug with 4.7.2 build and 3.14.1

2012-11-09 Thread Kyle Lutz
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Andrew Parker andy.john.par...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I get this error building a fresh clone of 3.14.1 using gcc 4.7.2, vtk build and works perfectly fine with this compiler so I presume it's a slight change in ordering that has caused the problem.: [

Re: [Paraview] Bug with 4.7.2 build and 3.14.1

2012-11-09 Thread Kyle Lutz
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Andrew Parker andy.john.par...@googlemail.com wrote: As I said, I'm using gcc 4.7.2 built on opensuse 12.1. Both CMake and VTK 5.10.1 are built with this compiler and are working perfectly properly. However, I was using an old build of paraview. Updating this

Re: [Paraview] Mesh Quality

2012-11-09 Thread David Thompson
Hi Fastl, I am using the Filter called 'Mesh Quality' with the 'Scaled Jacobian' option for hexahedral elements. I have some elements which have only six different vertices (instead of eight, which leads to a wedge) and the result is a value like 1e+30. I want to analyze this result,

[Paraview] Best way to make a part of a 3D field/VR invisible

2012-11-09 Thread Stéphane Backaert
Dear all, I have a big rectangular 3D field (few GB) sitting on a uniform grid (hdf5+xdmf reader, 3DCORECTMesh topology). I would like to make a 3D volume rendering but only on a part of it as this scheme tries to show: /--/ /-/ |--/ | l---/ | |___| / This helps me

[Paraview] Problem with Pixie files: build 3.14.1 and 3.98.0

2012-11-09 Thread Claudio Zanni
I already had this problem with Paraview 3.14.1 but I received no answer to a first email, so I tried to investigate on my own since the problem is still present in release 3.98.0. Paraview can not open a Pixie file (it's a HDF5 format included through the VisIt Database Bridge) when the file

Re: [Paraview] ANN: ParaView 3.98.0, Release Candidate 1 now available for download

2012-11-09 Thread Gena Bug
Hi! Thank you for your work! Properties tab is much more convenient now. Some bugs or smth that I've noticed: 1. Fonts look awful on my Debian testing amd64 (screenshot is attached) 2. After pressing 'Show' button in Color group the error appears Arguments to

[Paraview] Persistent data across time step changes in programmable filter

2012-11-09 Thread Sean Ziegeler
Howdy! I'm writing a programmable filter that makes changes to a vector field based on grid point properties (it's a polar orthographic transform using a highly accurate Earth shape model). This works well. However, when one changes the time step, it recomputes those grid point properties

Re: [Paraview] CoProcessing needed fields

2012-11-09 Thread Tim Gallagher
It is 'input'. I ran for 120 time steps so I got 12 images -- the original export script generated all gray and the modified one generated the correct data. I will update the source/rebuild and run your files and let you know. Thanks, Tim - Original Message - From: Andy Bauer