On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 21:41:09 +, Anthony Crognale wrote:
> Looks like building for release worked properly, the resulting
> Paraview runs fine now.
>
> Thanks much for your help!
Great!
FYI, the release mode improvments are here:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:00:22 +, Anthony Crognale wrote:
> After enabling qt and recompiling after a clean, I receive the following
> error:
"make clean" isn't really reliable in a superbuild. I usually do "rm -rf
*/"[1] in the build tree to keep the cache but kill any state related to
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 21:35:20 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> I think qt was renamed to qt4 after 4.3.1 was released
Just looked; this is indeed new for 4.4.0.
--Ben
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
From: Ben Boeckel <ben.boec...@kitware.com>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:12 AM
To: Anthony Crognale
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview
4.3.1 Superbuild
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:00:22
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 14:15:26 +, Anthony Crognale wrote:
> I had been using the system libpng version 1.2.52, but it appears
> `png_set_longjmp_fn` was not introduced until 1.6, so I tried building
> libpng 1.6.18 from source last night, which then allows Paraview to
> continue building
ew.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview
4.3.1 Superbuild
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 14:15:26 +, Anthony Crognale wrote:
> I had been using the system libpng version 1.2.52, but it appears
> `png_set_longjmp_fn` was not introduced until 1.6, so I tr
ew.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview
4.3.1 Superbuild
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 19:29:58 +, Anthony Crognale wrote:
> I was indeed compiling in Debug mode! Is there a different recommended
> way to compile the application in debug mode then?
:29 AM
To: Anthony Crognale
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview
4.3.1 Superbuild
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 14:15:26 +, Anthony Crognale wrote:
> I had been using the system libpng version 1.2.52, but it appears
> `png_se
mbolic link
to libpng14d.so.14.8.0, which does indeed exist.
Thoughts?
Trying yet another build from a completely clean working slate now.
Anthony
From: Ben Boeckel <ben.boec...@kitware.com>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 11:29 AM
To: Anthony
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 19:05:27 +, Anthony Crognale wrote:
> Another quick follow up (sorry!)
>
> [pid 360]
> stat("/home/acrognale/paraview/build/qt/src/qt/src/3rdparty/libpng",
> {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
> [pid 360] openat(AT_FDCWD,
>
, 2015 3:16 PM
To: Anthony Crognale
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview
4.3.1 Superbuild
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 19:05:27 +, Anthony Crognale wrote:
> Another quick follow up (sorry!)
>
> [pid 360]
> stat("/
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 19:29:58 +, Anthony Crognale wrote:
> I was indeed compiling in Debug mode! Is there a different recommended
> way to compile the application in debug mode then?
Not cleanly. I can add a flag for that as well.
Currently, once ParaView is done configuring, stop the
??Hello Paraview Users,
Having a bit of an issue with Paraview's Superbuild not packaging
/usr/bin/paraview and other related binaries with the TGZ generator.
Full output truncated below, but one of the lines of "cpack -G TGZ" outputs,
Determining dependencies for 'pvbatch'.
This seems
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 00:55:42 +, Anthony Crognale wrote:
> /usr/bin/paraview is not in this list, nor the other binaries that I
> would expect when it is built.
Usually means Qt wasn't enabled.
> I've attached my CMakeCache.txt to this email as it would be rather
> large to paste.
>
>
rg
Subject: Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview
4.3.1 Superbuild
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 00:55:42 +, Anthony Crognale wrote:
> /usr/bin/paraview is not in this list, nor the other binaries that I
> would expect when it is built.
Usually means Qt was
15 matches
Mail list logo