Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-15 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 21:41:09 +, Anthony Crognale wrote: > Looks like building for release worked properly, the resulting > Paraview runs fine now. > > Thanks much for your help! Great! FYI, the release mode improvments are here:

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:00:22 +, Anthony Crognale wrote: > After enabling qt and recompiling after a clean, I receive the following > error: "make clean" isn't really reliable in a superbuild. I usually do "rm -rf */"[1] in the build tree to keep the cache but kill any state related to

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 21:35:20 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: > I think qt was renamed to qt4 after 4.3.1 was released Just looked; this is indeed new for 4.4.0. --Ben ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-14 Thread Anthony Crognale
From: Ben Boeckel <ben.boec...@kitware.com> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:12 AM To: Anthony Crognale Cc: paraview@paraview.org Subject: Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:00:22

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 14:15:26 +, Anthony Crognale wrote: > I had been using the system libpng version 1.2.52, but it appears > `png_set_longjmp_fn` was not introduced until 1.6, so I tried building > libpng 1.6.18 from source last night, which then allows Paraview to > continue building

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-14 Thread Anthony Crognale
ew.org Subject: Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 14:15:26 +, Anthony Crognale wrote: > I had been using the system libpng version 1.2.52, but it appears > `png_set_longjmp_fn` was not introduced until 1.6, so I tr

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-14 Thread Anthony Crognale
ew.org Subject: Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 19:29:58 +, Anthony Crognale wrote: > I was indeed compiling in Debug mode! Is there a different recommended > way to compile the application in debug mode then?

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-14 Thread Anthony Crognale
:29 AM To: Anthony Crognale Cc: paraview@paraview.org Subject: Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 14:15:26 +, Anthony Crognale wrote: > I had been using the system libpng version 1.2.52, but it appears > `png_se

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-14 Thread Anthony Crognale
mbolic link to libpng14d.so.14.8.0, which does indeed exist. Thoughts? Trying yet another build from a completely clean working slate now. Anthony From: Ben Boeckel <ben.boec...@kitware.com> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 11:29 AM To: Anthony

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 19:05:27 +, Anthony Crognale wrote: > Another quick follow up (sorry!) > > [pid 360] > stat("/home/acrognale/paraview/build/qt/src/qt/src/3rdparty/libpng", > {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 > [pid 360] openat(AT_FDCWD, >

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-14 Thread Anthony Crognale
, 2015 3:16 PM To: Anthony Crognale Cc: paraview@paraview.org Subject: Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 19:05:27 +, Anthony Crognale wrote: > Another quick follow up (sorry!) > > [pid 360] > stat("/

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-14 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 19:29:58 +, Anthony Crognale wrote: > I was indeed compiling in Debug mode! Is there a different recommended > way to compile the application in debug mode then? Not cleanly. I can add a flag for that as well. Currently, once ParaView is done configuring, stop the

[Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-13 Thread Anthony Crognale
??Hello Paraview Users, Having a bit of an issue with Paraview's Superbuild not packaging /usr/bin/paraview and other related binaries with the TGZ generator. Full output truncated below, but one of the lines of "cpack -G TGZ" outputs, Determining dependencies for 'pvbatch'. This seems

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-13 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 00:55:42 +, Anthony Crognale wrote: > /usr/bin/paraview is not in this list, nor the other binaries that I > would expect when it is built. Usually means Qt wasn't enabled. > I've attached my CMakeCache.txt to this email as it would be rather > large to paste. > >

Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild

2015-09-13 Thread Anthony Crognale
rg Subject: Re: [Paraview] /usr/bin/paraview not packaged with CPack in Paraview 4.3.1 Superbuild On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 00:55:42 +, Anthony Crognale wrote: > /usr/bin/paraview is not in this list, nor the other binaries that I > would expect when it is built. Usually means Qt was