Oops, my bad! I missed the original patch I sent skipped reading data
on other processes even in the multi-grid case. I've pushed a fix.
Attached is the corrected patch (start with a clean version of Xdmf
w/o the previous patch).
Utkarsh
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Paul Melis
Hi,
On 08/16/2011 06:22 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
If you're writing out data that is already partitioned, you should
write it out as a collection of grids. Then each grid in that
collection is read on a separate partition.
Manual partitioning was something I was hoping to avoid. I figured
Hi Utkarsh,
On 08/16/2011 06:22 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
If you're writing out data that is already partitioned, you should
write it out as a collection of grids. Then each grid in that
collection is read on a separate partition.
I followed your advice, but seem to have hit on another bug,
Sure, I have a simplified dataset for you showing the problem. It also
shows a crasher bug (load dataset, add process id scalars filter, add
histogram - crash)
Paul
On 08/15/2011 10:27 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
That sounds like a bug. Can you share the dataset? I can send you an
url you can
Thanks for reporting Paul. The issue is now fixed
(http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12527). The fix will make it into
git-master at the next gatekeeper review and will be included in 3.12.
Attached is the patch for same.
Utkarsh
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Paul Melis paul.me...@sara.nl
On 08/16/2011 04:23 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
Thanks for reporting Paul. The issue is now fixed
(http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12527). The fix will make it into
git-master at the next gatekeeper review and will be included in 3.12.
No problem, thanks for the quick fix!
Attached is the
Paul,
If you're writing out data that is already partitioned, you should
write it out as a collection of grids. Then each grid in that
collection is read on a separate partition.
Utkarsh
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Paul Melis paul.me...@sara.nl wrote:
On 08/16/2011 04:23 PM, Utkarsh
Hi,
With a dataset stored in Xdmf I get an interesing data duplication
result. The set consists of 55296 points, each with associated scalar
and vector values. See below for the XML file and HDF5 layout.
It loads fine when running PV standalone. But when loading this set on a
parallel PV server
On 08/15/2011 04:17 PM, Paul Melis wrote:
With a dataset stored in Xdmf I get an interesing data duplication
result. The set consists of 55296 points, each with associated scalar
and vector values. See below for the XML file and HDF5 layout.
[...]
?xml version=1.0?
Xdmf
Domain
That sounds like a bug. Can you share the dataset? I can send you an
url you can use to upload the dataset directly to us.
Utkarsh
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Paul Melis paul.me...@sara.nl wrote:
On 08/15/2011 04:17 PM, Paul Melis wrote:
With a dataset stored in Xdmf I get an interesing
10 matches
Mail list logo
