Re: [Paraview] Find points within radius

Dear Kenneth, thank you for your answer. Here is the message from my colleague. Bertrand Hello, I am the colleague using ParaView 4.3.1! First of all, thank you for your response, it has explained a lot of results since I tend to forget about computer and floating point. Unfortunately

Re: [Paraview] Question mark button launches a blank window with 5.1.0

Thanks for reporting that. We may need to do a 5.1.1 patch release soon. If so, I'll make sure this one gets addressed too. On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:37 AM, kenichiro yoshimi wrote: > Hi all, > > I use ParaView 5.1.0 version installed from a binary file >

Re: [Paraview] Opacity Issues

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:15 PM, David Lonie wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Paluszek, Lukasz < > lukasz.palus...@airbus.com> wrote: > >> It doesn’t happen all the time, I suppose you need a fairly large surface >> dataset. I managed to reproduce the problem on

Re: [Paraview] Opacity Issues

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Paluszek, Lukasz < lukasz.palus...@airbus.com> wrote: > It doesn’t happen all the time, I suppose you need a fairly large surface > dataset. I managed to reproduce the problem on a wavelet source (attached > state file), try increasing the number of elements if

Re: [Paraview] Minor bug in OPENFOAM import filter

Hi Eugene, On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Eugene de Villiers wrote: > Attached find a small case > Thanks -- I've loaded this up and can reproduce the error. The error occurs in vtkFoamEntryValue::ReadList, which contains the following comment: // general-purpose

Re: [Paraview] Opacity Issues

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Paluszek, Lukasz < lukasz.palus...@airbus.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > > In Paraview 5.1.0 with OpenGL2, I have black slices throughout the model > when opacity is on in parallel mode (see attached picture). When switching > depth peeling off, the black slices

Re: [Paraview] Opacity Issues

In Paraview 5.1.0 with OpenGL2, I have black slices throughout the model when opacity is on in parallel mode (see attached picture). When switching depth peeling off, the black slices disappear but the image gets blurred and some pixels glow with random colours. Is there a version with the

[Paraview] Opacity Issues

Hello, In Paraview 5.1.0 with OpenGL2, I have black slices throughout the model when opacity is on in parallel mode (see attached picture). When switching depth peeling off, the black slices disappear but the image gets blurred and some pixels glow with random colours. I can't reproduce it

Re: [Paraview] Required CMake version 3.5

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:28:29 -0400, Jim wrote: > Can you let me know how it goes? I just pulled the latest versions of > Paraview & cmake and want to build under VS2015. I'm going to work on it > over the weekend. If you're doing the same, I could use any > configuration tricks you

Re: [Paraview] Required CMake version 3.5

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 15:50:45 +0200, Christoph Grüninger wrote: > I don't think it is a good idea to ask for the latest version. Only > developers like us have > a current version of CMake installed. From already released distributions > nobody > provides CMake 3.5. My thought here is that

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] ANN: ParaView 5.1.0 available for download

Just make sure you check out the latest superbuild (or the release branch). It has all the fixes needed to ensure the internal harcoded version is set to 5.1.0 (https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild/blob/release/CMake/DetermineParaViewVersion.cmake) Utkarsh On Fri, Jun 24,

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] ANN: ParaView 5.1.0 available for download (UNCLASSIFIED)

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED Rick, In the superbuild source directory The file CMake/DetermineParaViewVersion.cmake line 10 Change set (hardcoded_paraview_version "5.0.1") to set (hardcoded_paraview_version "5.1.0") Thanks, Joe ~~~ Joseph G. Hennessey

Re: [Paraview] Required CMake version 3.5

Hi Ben, I don't think it is a good idea to ask for the latest version. Only developers like us have a current version of CMake installed. From already released distributions nobody provides CMake 3.5. > Though I question the distro update policies surrounding where ParaView > is aggressively

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] ANN: ParaView 5.1.0 available for download

Utkarsh - I’ve having trouble getting a build using 5.1 …. I’m running a “make install” and it seems to be looking for install/lib/paraview-5.1 but what actually exists in the build directory is install/lib/paraview-5.0 … not sure if my superbuild is hosed or if there’s something wrong deep in

Re: [Paraview] Required CMake version 3.5

On 06/24/2016 09:23 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 00:25:00 +0200, Cory Quammen wrote: @Ben, I assume all the dashboard machines are running CMake 3.5. Do you think we should downgrade one to CMake 3.3? I was actually going to upgrade them to 3.6's rc today to test it out.

Re: [Paraview] Required CMake version 3.5

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 00:25:00 +0200, Cory Quammen wrote: > @Utkarsh, any foreseeable problems reducing the CMake required version to 3.3? I think we'll want 3.5 in the (hopefully) near future, so if distributions don't have a new enough CMake, they can patch it down to 3.3 in the meantime. A

[Paraview] Question mark button launches a blank window with 5.1.0

Hi all, I use ParaView 5.1.0 version installed from a binary file ParaView-5.1.0-Qt4-OpenGL2-Windows-64bit.exe. Unfortunately, this version's "ParaView Online Help" launched by clicking on Question mark button is not available because the opened window is blank. This problem did not occur with

Re: [Paraview] Paraview 5.0.1 - Registering new view

Thank you so much Utkarsh, this is the function I was looking for. Andrzej -Original Message- From: Utkarsh Ayachit [mailto:utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com] Sent: 22 June 2016 21:39 To: Andrzej Peczak Cc: paraview@paraview.org Subject: Re: [Paraview] Paraview 5.0.1 - Registering new view