The easiest way to do such a thing is as follows:
1. Apply Extract TimeSteps filter to your reader/source to choose the
timesteps of interest.
2. Apply Group TimeSteps filter to it to group the timesteps extracted
in (1) into a mutliblock dataset with 1 block for each selected
timestep in order.
Omid,
Even after applying the Threshold filter, I cannot replicate your problem. I’ve
tried on both ParaView 5.2 and 5.4. Both work fine for me.
My settings are the default. “Resolve Coincident Topology” is set to “Shift
z-buffer when rendering lines and points”. “Z Shift” is set to 0.002.
Here is an answer from Cory last summer, off list, to one of my customers:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Cory Quammen wrote:
> Dear ,
>
> I think the Force Time filter will come in handy here for this use
> case. It can be used to "freeze" a dataset at a certain
Hi Ken,
Thanks for the detailed reply. I could not get anything out of the settings
dialog as per your suggestion. Did you have a combination of those settings
that might work for my files?
I can also see the image you sent; that's usually fine. However, I
typically apply a Threshold filter to
Dear ParaView team,
I read a post at the ParaView website concerning variables and different
time steps (see
https://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/2014-May/031054.html). I
have a similar problem and I want to access values from different time
steps using the programmable filter with
I don't see any errors in the terminal output you've posted. Are there
errors further back in the terminal output history?
Thanks,
Cory
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:28 AM, Yangguang Liao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trying to compile Paraview but get such error. I have no idea what is the
Great, thanks for the follow up.
Cory
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Charlie Talbot wrote:
> That seems to work, thank you very much! I had some issues with Paraview 5.0
> (crashed upon python calculation) but this did indeed work after upgrading
> to Paraview 5.4
>
> On