It appears to be the poor man's house, hence 8mm required.
Guess at a 1 or 2DK.
OPeter
Paul Eriksson wrote:
If we're not talking about the *ist D then it would be
FA 24mm f/2.0
FA 35mm f/2.0
FA 100mm macro f/2.8
FA 80-200mm f/2.8 or FA 200mm f/2.
If you can stand 1 stop slower for the first three,
substitute:
K 24mm f/2.8
M 35mm f/f.8
M 100mm macro f/4
And if you want a 200mm
Hi!
And if you want a 200mm prime instead of the 4th:
M 200mm f/4
Lon, mind if I ask you (and other wizards) about this very lens. Is it
heavy? How's it optically? Is there A version?
Boris
No wizard, me. But I do own one. The M-200 f/4 is smallish,
52mm thread, built-in hood. I like mine a lot, although scans
often show slight chromatic problems (yellowish fringe on one
side of an object, bluish on the other). I assume, therefore,
no APO elements were used to construct it. The
8:56 AM
Subject: Re: some more *ist D samples
If you could only have four lenses in your camera bag, which ones would
you
chose and why. I ask this because I am trying to narrow down my choices
and
assess my needs versus wants while still be able to pay the mortgage!
I have the K1000 and ZX
Hi,
An interesting selection of gear. Especially the LX titanium(?) plus
winder and battery pack thrown on the top of the pile. I don't look
after my own gear as well as I would like (yes, there is Irish blood in
my background) but I would be embarassed to show this to the world.
Most of it
Do they do this because the price of land (space) is so precious
and the price of Pentax gear is so cheap? (relatively speaking g )
Bob S.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Damn
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One more link here:
Is this a private collection or does this guy own a store? If this is
just a hobby, I think we can safely say that he's not bothered by the
price of the *istD. Maybe we could write to him and have a PDML meeting
at his house. He certainly justifies the pentax-fan title in the
URL.
Steven
Patrick Wunsch wrote:
If you could only have four lenses in your camera bag, which ones would you
chose and why. I ask this because I am trying to narrow down my choices
and
assess my needs versus wants while still be able to pay the mortgage!
I have the K1000 and ZX-5n cameras and am most
on 9/10/03 9:56 AM, Patrick Wunsch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you could only have four lenses in your camera bag, which ones would you
chose and why. I ask this because I am trying to narrow down my choices and
assess my needs versus wants while still be able to pay the mortgage!
I
.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Patrick Wunsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2003 16:57
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: some more *ist D samples
If you could only have four lenses in your camera bag, which ones would you
chose and why. I ask this because I am trying
: Patrick Wunsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: some more *ist D samples
If you could only have four lenses in your camera bag, which ones would you
chose and why. I ask this because I am trying to narrow down my choices
This is an interesting question to me because I normally carry 4 lenses in
my camera bag.
24mm/2.0 Vivitar
50mm/1.7 Pentax-M
100mm/2.8 Pentax-M
80/200mm/2.8 Tokina
+ a 2x teleconverter to make the Tokina a 160-400/5.6
The reason I use the Vivitar and the 1.7 is because the M24/2.8 and M50/1.4
And, then again, maybe it is a set up studio shot.
--graywolf (playing devils advocate)
http://graywolfphoto.com
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 4:52 AM
Subject: Re: some more *ist D samples (Pentax pile
Small bag in the car right now...
A20mm/2.8
K24mm/2.8
FA43mm/1.9
FA77mm/1.9
and LX body
Sometimes the 24-43-77 are replaced by
M50mm/1.4 and
A100/2.8 Macro
...still a small kit, but not cheap!
Regards, Bob S.
Patrick Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you could only have four lenses in your
Hi. I am new to this group, but not new to Pentax. I have been happily using Pentax
equipment for 15 years. The four lenses that I would not be without are:
1. 20mm f2.8
2. 31mm limited
3. 77mm limited
4. Tamron 24-135mm SP zoom
The quality of the Limited lenses speak for themselves, the 20mm
-
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: some more *ist D samples
15mm f/3.5
24mm f/2.0
43mm f/1.9
80-200 f/2.8
Money weight no object:
FA* 24
FA* 28-70
FA* 80-200
FA* 250 -600
Less range, all primes, and FAR less money weight
L 31
L 43
L 77
FA 100 Macro
Less Range and Money:
FA 24-90
FA 100 Macro
F 70-210
F* 300
And to the venerable Bill C. from the beautiful Oregon Coast, we all
hope you are out
Money weight no object:
FA* 24
FA* 28-70
FA* 80-200
FA* 250 -600
I'd consider substituting the 17-35 Fisheye at the wide end.
That's actually a lens that's high on my 'want' list. Not that
I'll get a chance to buy one all that soon - buying a *ist-D has
more than used up my
The first set of images appear to be mostly OOF. Either that or the
lens he is using is not great.
The second link has images that are really lacking in contrast, its
mostly because of the drab lighting. He should have picked a nicer day.
Thanks for the links though, they are informative
One more link here:
http://www.pentax-fan.jp/BODY/istD.asp
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
One more link here:
http://www.pentax-fan.jp/BODY/istD.asp
Good grief! Did you see the pile of random Pentax gear on the counter
in that 8mm fisheye shot? And when I say pile, I mean pile!
Wow. Those limiteds are amazing. And they appear to be wide open too!
Alan Chan wrote:
One more link here:
http://www.pentax-fan.jp/BODY/istD.asp
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2
Damn
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: some more *ist D samples
One more link here:
http://www.pentax-fan.jp/BODY/istD.asp
Good grief! Did you see the pile of random Pentax
At least now we know even the LX2000 wasn't that expensive. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Good grief! Did you see the pile of random Pentax gear on the counter
in that 8mm fisheye shot? And when I say pile, I mean pile!
25 matches
Mail list logo
