Hi,
Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2018, 08:45:08 CEST schrieb Chris Ridd:
> > On 19 Jun 2018, at 05:58, Zeus Panchenko wrote:
> >
> > Chris Ridd wrote:
> >> Net::LDAP's moddn method does not take a „recursively“ option.
> >
> > may it sound sane to add it to the method?
> >
> >> The LDAP modifydn
> On 19 Jun 2018, at 05:58, Zeus Panchenko wrote:
>
> Chris Ridd wrote:
>> Net::LDAP's moddn method does not take a „recursively“ option.
>
> may it sound sane to add it to the method?
>
>> The LDAP modifydn operation is already defined to move all the entry's
>> children.
>
> I believe,
Chris Ridd wrote:
> I would note that storing entries subordinate to user entries is rather
> unusual.
yes, it is, the idea was to hold all related to user branches in one
single root
here there is the diagram of DB topology:
> On 18 Jun 2018, at 12:33, Zeus Panchenko wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> hi
>
> what is the best practice to moddn() for branch of objects?
I’m not really sure “best practice” is relevant here - whatever you need to do
needs to be expressed in LDAP protocol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
what is the best practice to moddn() for branch of objects?
lets say we have two objects:
- ---[ user A start ]---
dn: uid=naf.nafus,ou=People,dc=umidb
dn:
