doc: Mention all options equivalent to pg_dump --filter patterns.
In the documentation for pg_dump's new --filter option, added by
commit a5cf808be5, each object pattern should match some other
existing pg_dump option, but some had been omitted, so add them.
Noted by Daniel Gustafsson, reviewed
Fix PL/pgSQL's handling of integer ranges containing underscores.
Commit faff8f8e47 allowed integer literals to contain underscores, but
failed to update the lexer's "numericfail" rule. As a result, a
decimal integer literal containing underscores would fail to parse, if
used in an integer range
Fix PL/pgSQL's handling of integer ranges containing underscores.
Commit faff8f8e47 allowed integer literals to contain underscores, but
failed to update the lexer's "numericfail" rule. As a result, a
decimal integer literal containing underscores would fail to parse, if
used in an integer range
Fix another couple of outdated comments for MERGE RETURNING.
Oversights in c649fa24a4 which added RETURNING support to MERGE.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/caaphdvpqp6vtuzg-_josueibgyqnrnvxj-vdf+hjlxjhdhz...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
Use macro NUM_MERGE_MATCH_KINDS instead of '3' in MERGE code.
Code quality improvement for 0294df2f1f84.
Aleksander Alekseev, reviewed by Richard Guo.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAJ7c6TMsiaV5urU_Pq6zJ2tXPDwk69-NKVh4AMN5XrRiM7N%2BGA%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
or BY TARGET is
equivalent to writing WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Alvaro Herrera, Ted Yu and Vik Fearing.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWqnKGc57Y_JanUBHQXNKcXd7r=0r4nezuvwp+syrk...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg
file.
The existing random(), random_normal(), and setseed() functions are
moved there too, so that they can all share the same PRNG state, which
is kept private to that file.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Jian He, David Zhang, Aleksander Alekseev,
and Tomas Vondra.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es
Add "--exclude-extension" to pg_dump's options.
This option (or equivalently specifying "exclude extension pattern" in
a filter file) allows extensions matching the specified pattern to be
excluded from the dump.
Ayush Vatsa, reviewed by Junwang Zhao, Dean Rasheed, a
Fix PDF doc generation.
Commit c649fa24a4 broke PDF generation, due to a misplaced id
attribute.
Per buildfarm member crake.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7eb9a8201890f3b208fd4c109a5b08bf139b692a
Modified Files
--
of a MERGE
query's RETURNING list.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Isaac Morland, Vik Fearing, Alvaro Herrera,
Gurjeet Singh, Jian He, Jeff Davis, Merlin Moncure, Peter Eisentraut,
and Wolfgang Walther.
Discussion:
http://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWePEGQR5LBn-vD6SfeLZafzEm2Qy_L_Oky2=qw2w3...@mail.gmail.com
Fix EXPLAIN output for subplans in MERGE.
Given a subplan in a MERGE query, EXPLAIN would sometimes fail to
properly display expressions involving Params referencing variables in
other parts of the plan tree.
This would affect subplans outside the topmost join plan node, for
which expansion of
Fix EXPLAIN output for subplans in MERGE.
Given a subplan in a MERGE query, EXPLAIN would sometimes fail to
properly display expressions involving Params referencing variables in
other parts of the plan tree.
This would affect subplans outside the topmost join plan node, for
which expansion of
Fix EXPLAIN output for subplans in MERGE.
Given a subplan in a MERGE query, EXPLAIN would sometimes fail to
properly display expressions involving Params referencing variables in
other parts of the plan tree.
This would affect subplans outside the topmost join plan node, for
which expansion of
doc: Improve a couple of places in the MERGE docs.
In the synopsis, make the syntax for merge_update consistent with the
syntax for a plain UPDATE command. It was missing the optional "ROW"
keyword that can be used in a multi-column assignment, and the option
to assign from a multi-column
doc: Improve a couple of places in the MERGE docs.
In the synopsis, make the syntax for merge_update consistent with the
syntax for a plain UPDATE command. It was missing the optional "ROW"
keyword that can be used in a multi-column assignment, and the option
to assign from a multi-column
doc: Improve a couple of places in the MERGE docs.
In the synopsis, make the syntax for merge_update consistent with the
syntax for a plain UPDATE command. It was missing the optional "ROW"
keyword that can be used in a multi-column assignment, and the option
to assign from a multi-column
Fix handling of self-modified tuples in MERGE.
When an UPDATE or DELETE action in MERGE returns TM_SelfModified,
there are 2 possible causes:
1). The target tuple was already updated or deleted by the current
command. This can happen if the target row joins to more than one
source row,
Fix handling of self-modified tuples in MERGE.
When an UPDATE or DELETE action in MERGE returns TM_SelfModified,
there are 2 possible causes:
1). The target tuple was already updated or deleted by the current
command. This can happen if the target row joins to more than one
source row,
Fix handling of self-modified tuples in MERGE.
When an UPDATE or DELETE action in MERGE returns TM_SelfModified,
there are 2 possible causes:
1). The target tuple was already updated or deleted by the current
command. This can happen if the target row joins to more than one
source row,
Fix doc omission for MERGE into updatable views.
Commit 5f2e179bd3 missed one place in rules.sgml that should have
mentioned MERGE. Also, be more specific when saying that MERGE doesn't
support rules, since it does support SELECT rules.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
there is no
rewriter support for non-SELECT rules with MERGE operations.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Jian He and Alvaro Herrera.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCVcB1g0nmxuEc-A+gGB0HnfcGQNGYH7gS=7rq0u0zo...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg
ate(),
ensuring that ExecUpdateEpilogue() is always called if ExecUpdateAct()
returns TM_Ok, reducing the chance of bugs.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Alvaro Herrera.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWGGmigGBzLHkJm5Ccv2mMxXmwi3%2Buq0yhwDHm-tsvSLg%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Deta
, so that it updates the command tag if it does a
cross-partition update, making this code path in ExecMergeMatched()
consistent with ExecUpdate().
Per bug #18238 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to v15, where MERGE
was introduced.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Richard Guo and Jian He.
Discussion
, so that it updates the command tag if it does a
cross-partition update, making this code path in ExecMergeMatched()
consistent with ExecUpdate().
Per bug #18238 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to v15, where MERGE
was introduced.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Richard Guo and Jian He.
Discussion
, so that it updates the command tag if it does a
cross-partition update, making this code path in ExecMergeMatched()
consistent with ExecUpdate().
Per bug #18238 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to v15, where MERGE
was introduced.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Richard Guo and Jian He.
Discussion
psql: Add tab completion for view options.
Add support for tab completion of WITH (...) options to CREATE VIEW,
and for the corresponding SET/RESET (...) options in ALTER VIEW.
Christoph Heiss, reviewed by Melih Mutlu, Vignesh C, Jim Jones,
Mikhail Gribkov, David Zhang, Shubham Khanna, and me.
Guard against overflow in interval_mul() and interval_div().
Commits 146604ec43 and a898b409f6 added overflow checks to
interval_mul(), but not to interval_div(), which contains almost
identical code, and so is susceptible to the same kinds of
overflows. In addition, those checks did not catch
Guard against overflow in interval_mul() and interval_div().
Commits 146604ec43 and a898b409f6 added overflow checks to
interval_mul(), but not to interval_div(), which contains almost
identical code, and so is susceptible to the same kinds of
overflows. In addition, those checks did not catch
Guard against overflow in interval_mul() and interval_div().
Commits 146604ec43 and a898b409f6 added overflow checks to
interval_mul(), but not to interval_div(), which contains almost
identical code, and so is susceptible to the same kinds of
overflows. In addition, those checks did not catch
Guard against overflow in interval_mul() and interval_div().
Commits 146604ec43 and a898b409f6 added overflow checks to
interval_mul(), but not to interval_div(), which contains almost
identical code, and so is susceptible to the same kinds of
overflows. In addition, those checks did not catch
Guard against overflow in interval_mul() and interval_div().
Commits 146604ec43 and a898b409f6 added overflow checks to
interval_mul(), but not to interval_div(), which contains almost
identical code, and so is susceptible to the same kinds of
overflows. In addition, those checks did not catch
Guard against overflow in interval_mul() and interval_div().
Commits 146604ec43 and a898b409f6 added overflow checks to
interval_mul(), but not to interval_div(), which contains almost
identical code, and so is susceptible to the same kinds of
overflows. In addition, those checks did not catch
doc: improve description of privileges for MERGE and update glossary.
On the MERGE page, the description of the privileges required could be
taken to imply that the SELECT privilege is required on all columns of
the data source, whereas actually it is only required on the columns
referred to by
doc: improve description of privileges for MERGE and update glossary.
On the MERGE page, the description of the privileges required could be
taken to imply that the SELECT privilege is required on all columns of
the data source, whereas actually it is only required on the columns
referred to by
doc: improve description of privileges for MERGE and update glossary.
On the MERGE page, the description of the privileges required could be
taken to imply that the SELECT privilege is required on all columns of
the data source, whereas actually it is only required on the columns
referred to by
Support +/- infinity in the interval data type.
This adds support for infinity to the interval data type, using the
same input/output representation as the other date/time data types
that support infinity. This allows various arithmetic operations on
infinite dates, timestamps and intervals.
The
Avoid integer overflow hazard in interval_time().
When casting an interval to a time, the original code suffered from
64-bit integer overflow for inputs with a sufficiently large negative
"time" field, leading to bogus results.
Fix by rewriting the algorithm in a simpler form, that more
Fix AFTER ROW trigger execution in MERGE cross-partition update.
When executing a MERGE UPDATE action, if the UPDATE is turned into a
cross-partition DELETE then INSERT, do not attempt to invoke AFTER
UPDATE ROW triggers, or any of the other post-update actions in
ExecUpdateEpilogue().
For
Fix AFTER ROW trigger execution in MERGE cross-partition update.
When executing a MERGE UPDATE action, if the UPDATE is turned into a
cross-partition DELETE then INSERT, do not attempt to invoke AFTER
UPDATE ROW triggers, or any of the other post-update actions in
ExecUpdateEpilogue().
For
Fix AFTER ROW trigger execution in MERGE cross-partition update.
When executing a MERGE UPDATE action, if the UPDATE is turned into a
cross-partition DELETE then INSERT, do not attempt to invoke AFTER
UPDATE ROW triggers, or any of the other post-update actions in
ExecUpdateEpilogue().
For
Fix corner-case 64-bit integer subtraction bug on some platforms.
When computing "0 - INT64_MIN", most platforms would report an
overflow error, which is correct. However, platforms without integer
overflow builtins or 128-bit integers would fail to spot the overflow,
and incorrectly return
Fix corner-case 64-bit integer subtraction bug on some platforms.
When computing "0 - INT64_MIN", most platforms would report an
overflow error, which is correct. However, platforms without integer
overflow builtins or 128-bit integers would fail to spot the overflow,
and incorrectly return
Fix corner-case 64-bit integer subtraction bug on some platforms.
When computing "0 - INT64_MIN", most platforms would report an
overflow error, which is correct. However, platforms without integer
overflow builtins or 128-bit integers would fail to spot the overflow,
and incorrectly return
Fix corner-case 64-bit integer subtraction bug on some platforms.
When computing "0 - INT64_MIN", most platforms would report an
overflow error, which is correct. However, platforms without integer
overflow builtins or 128-bit integers would fail to spot the overflow,
and incorrectly return
Fix corner-case 64-bit integer subtraction bug on some platforms.
When computing "0 - INT64_MIN", most platforms would report an
overflow error, which is correct. However, platforms without integer
overflow builtins or 128-bit integers would fail to spot the overflow,
and incorrectly return
Fix corner-case 64-bit integer subtraction bug on some platforms.
When computing "0 - INT64_MIN", most platforms would report an
overflow error, which is correct. However, platforms without integer
overflow builtins or 128-bit integers would fail to spot the overflow,
and incorrectly return
Guard against overflow in make_interval().
The original code did very little to guard against integer or floating
point overflow when computing the interval's fields. Detect any such
overflows and error out, rather than silently returning bogus results.
Joseph Koshakow, reviewed by Ashutosh
terval values.
Fix by setting all fields of the leftmost interval to their minimum
values, ensuring that the result is less than any other possible
interval. Since this only affects index searches, no index rebuild is
necessary.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by
terval values.
Fix by setting all fields of the leftmost interval to their minimum
values, ensuring that the result is less than any other possible
interval. Since this only affects index searches, no index rebuild is
necessary.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by
terval values.
Fix by setting all fields of the leftmost interval to their minimum
values, ensuring that the result is less than any other possible
interval. Since this only affects index searches, no index rebuild is
necessary.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by
terval values.
Fix by setting all fields of the leftmost interval to their minimum
values, ensuring that the result is less than any other possible
interval. Since this only affects index searches, no index rebuild is
necessary.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by
terval values.
Fix by setting all fields of the leftmost interval to their minimum
values, ensuring that the result is less than any other possible
interval. Since this only affects index searches, no index rebuild is
necessary.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by
terval values.
Fix by setting all fields of the leftmost interval to their minimum
values, ensuring that the result is less than any other possible
interval. Since this only affects index searches, no index rebuild is
necessary.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by
terval values.
Fix by setting all fields of the leftmost interval to their minimum
values, ensuring that the result is less than any other possible
interval. Since this only affects index searches, no index rebuild is
necessary.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by
to return the same source
tuples when re-running the join query.
Fix by ensuring that preprocess_rowmarks() sets up PlanRowMarks for
all non-target relations used in MERGE, in the same way that it does
for UPDATE and DELETE.
Per bug #18103. Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was introduced.
Dean Rasheed
to return the same source
tuples when re-running the join query.
Fix by ensuring that preprocess_rowmarks() sets up PlanRowMarks for
all non-target relations used in MERGE, in the same way that it does
for UPDATE and DELETE.
Per bug #18103. Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was introduced.
Dean Rasheed
to return the same source
tuples when re-running the join query.
Fix by ensuring that preprocess_rowmarks() sets up PlanRowMarks for
all non-target relations used in MERGE, in the same way that it does
for UPDATE and DELETE.
Per bug #18103. Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was introduced.
Dean Rasheed
policies to the join).
Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was introduced.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Stephen Frost.
Security: CVE-2023-39418
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/cb2ae5741f2458a474ed3c31458d242e678ff229
Modified Files
policies to the join).
Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was introduced.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Stephen Frost.
Security: CVE-2023-39418
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c2e08b04c9e71ac6aabdc7d9b3f8e785e164d770
Modified Files
--
src
policies to the join).
Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was introduced.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Stephen Frost.
Security: CVE-2023-39418
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/67a007dc0cdb8578726c2000a7abc513109cb4a2
Modified Files
implementations. However, past experience has shown that there are
almost certainly going to be additional unexpected portability issues,
so these tests may well need further adjustments, based on the
buildfarm results.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Nathan Bossart and Thomas Munro.
Discussion:
https
Fix MERGE command tag for actions blocked by BEFORE ROW triggers.
This ensures that the row count in the command tag for a MERGE is
correctly computed in the case where UPDATEs or DELETEs are skipped
due to a BEFORE ROW trigger returning NULL (the INSERT case was
already handled correctly by
Fix MERGE command tag for actions blocked by BEFORE ROW triggers.
This ensures that the row count in the command tag for a MERGE is
correctly computed in the case where UPDATEs or DELETEs are skipped
due to a BEFORE ROW trigger returning NULL (the INSERT case was
already handled correctly by
Fix concurrent update issues with MERGE.
If MERGE attempts an UPDATE or DELETE on a table with BEFORE ROW
triggers, or a cross-partition UPDATE (with or without triggers), and
a concurrent UPDATE or DELETE happens, the merge code would fail.
In some cases this would lead to a crash, while in
Fix concurrent update issues with MERGE.
If MERGE attempts an UPDATE or DELETE on a table with BEFORE ROW
triggers, or a cross-partition UPDATE (with or without triggers), and
a concurrent UPDATE or DELETE happens, the merge code would fail.
In some cases this would lead to a crash, while in
Doc: Miscellaneous doc updates for MERGE.
Update a few places in the documentation that should mention MERGE
among the list of applicable commands. In a couple of places, a
slightly more detailed description of what happens for MERGE seems
appropriate.
Reviewed by Alvaro Herrera.
Discussion:
Doc: Miscellaneous doc updates for MERGE.
Update a few places in the documentation that should mention MERGE
among the list of applicable commands. In a couple of places, a
slightly more detailed description of what happens for MERGE seems
appropriate.
Reviewed by Alvaro Herrera.
Discussion:
, at rule-definition time, the user isn't required to
mark the subquery with LATERAL, and so it can fail when the rule is
used.
Fix this by marking such subqueries as lateral in the rewriter, at the
point where they're used.
Dean Rasheed and Tom Lane, per report from Alexander Lakhin.
Back-patch to all
, at rule-definition time, the user isn't required to
mark the subquery with LATERAL, and so it can fail when the rule is
used.
Fix this by marking such subqueries as lateral in the rewriter, at the
point where they're used.
Dean Rasheed and Tom Lane, per report from Alexander Lakhin.
Back-patch to all
, at rule-definition time, the user isn't required to
mark the subquery with LATERAL, and so it can fail when the rule is
used.
Fix this by marking such subqueries as lateral in the rewriter, at the
point where they're used.
Dean Rasheed and Tom Lane, per report from Alexander Lakhin.
Back-patch to all
, at rule-definition time, the user isn't required to
mark the subquery with LATERAL, and so it can fail when the rule is
used.
Fix this by marking such subqueries as lateral in the rewriter, at the
point where they're used.
Dean Rasheed and Tom Lane, per report from Alexander Lakhin.
Back-patch to all
, at rule-definition time, the user isn't required to
mark the subquery with LATERAL, and so it can fail when the rule is
used.
Fix this by marking such subqueries as lateral in the rewriter, at the
point where they're used.
Dean Rasheed and Tom Lane, per report from Alexander Lakhin.
Back-patch to all
, at rule-definition time, the user isn't required to
mark the subquery with LATERAL, and so it can fail when the rule is
used.
Fix this by marking such subqueries as lateral in the rewriter, at the
point where they're used.
Dean Rasheed and Tom Lane, per report from Alexander Lakhin.
Back-patch to all
points to has rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY.
Per bug #17803, from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17803-53c63ed4ecb4eac6%40postgresql.org
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/
points to has rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY.
Per bug #17803, from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17803-53c63ed4ecb4eac6%40postgresql.org
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/
points to has rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY.
Per bug #17803, from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17803-53c63ed4ecb4eac6%40postgresql.org
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/
points to has rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY.
Per bug #17803, from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17803-53c63ed4ecb4eac6%40postgresql.org
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/
points to has rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY.
Per bug #17803, from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17803-53c63ed4ecb4eac6%40postgresql.org
Branch
--
REL_13_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/
points to has rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY.
Per bug #17803, from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17803-53c63ed4ecb4eac6%40postgresql.org
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/
Add missing support for the latest SPI status codes.
SPI_result_code_string() was missing support for SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER,
and in v15 and later, it was missing support for SPI_OK_MERGE, as was
pltcl_process_SPI_result().
The last of those would trigger an error if a MERGE was executed from
Add missing support for the latest SPI status codes.
SPI_result_code_string() was missing support for SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER,
and in v15 and later, it was missing support for SPI_OK_MERGE, as was
pltcl_process_SPI_result().
The last of those would trigger an error if a MERGE was executed from
Add missing support for the latest SPI status codes.
SPI_result_code_string() was missing support for SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER,
and in v15 and later, it was missing support for SPI_OK_MERGE, as was
pltcl_process_SPI_result().
The last of those would trigger an error if a MERGE was executed from
Add missing support for the latest SPI status codes.
SPI_result_code_string() was missing support for SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER,
and in v15 and later, it was missing support for SPI_OK_MERGE, as was
pltcl_process_SPI_result().
The last of those would trigger an error if a MERGE was executed from
Add missing support for the latest SPI status codes.
SPI_result_code_string() was missing support for SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER,
and in v15 and later, it was missing support for SPI_OK_MERGE, as was
pltcl_process_SPI_result().
The last of those would trigger an error if a MERGE was executed from
Add missing support for the latest SPI status codes.
SPI_result_code_string() was missing support for SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER,
and in v15 and later, it was missing support for SPI_OK_MERGE, as was
pltcl_process_SPI_result().
The last of those would trigger an error if a MERGE was executed from
Fix Assert failure for MERGE into a partitioned table with RLS.
In ExecInitPartitionInfo(), the Assert when building the WITH CHECK
OPTION list for the new partition assumed that the command would be an
INSERT or UPDATE, but it can also be a MERGE. This can be triggered by
a MERGE into a
Fix Assert failure for MERGE into a partitioned table with RLS.
In ExecInitPartitionInfo(), the Assert when building the WITH CHECK
OPTION list for the new partition assumed that the command would be an
INSERT or UPDATE, but it can also be a MERGE. This can be triggered by
a MERGE into a
Fix MERGE command tag for cross-partition updates.
This ensures that the row count in the command tag for a MERGE is
correctly computed. Previously, if MERGE updated a partitioned table,
the row count would be incorrect if any row was moved to a different
partition, since such updates were
Fix MERGE command tag for cross-partition updates.
This ensures that the row count in the command tag for a MERGE is
correctly computed. Previously, if MERGE updated a partitioned table,
the row count would be incorrect if any row was moved to a different
partition, since such updates were
is allowed between any 2 digits, or immediately
after the base prefix indicator of non-decimal integers, per SQL:202x
draft.
Peter Eisentraut and Dean Rasheed
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/84aae844-dc55-a4be-86d9-4f0fa405cc97%40enterprisedb.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https
ch to v14, where it was introduced.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCW8gXgW0tgPxPgHDPhVX71%2BSWFRkhnXy%2BTfGDsKLepu2g%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/86bfbeab4f439ad527318d9edeb3c71ea4
ch to v14, where it was introduced.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCW8gXgW0tgPxPgHDPhVX71%2BSWFRkhnXy%2BTfGDsKLepu2g%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4f74741a5cea38228fdb0fb2967fa2137e
ch to v14, where it was introduced.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCW8gXgW0tgPxPgHDPhVX71%2BSWFRkhnXy%2BTfGDsKLepu2g%40mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/b2d47928908d7a99b8e39198d0e8e9e0cb2b024b
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 01:18, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Dean Rasheed writes:
>
> > 1). It doesn't work if log10val2 < 0, because then m < 0, and it
> > doesn't multiply by the remainder. And it then throws an overflow
> > error, because result.dscale comes out wrong w
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 15:15, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Looking at this diff made me wonder why the static pow10[] array
> isn't marked "const"?
>
Good point.
However, looking more closely, I think this function is more or less
completely broken:
1). It doesn't work if log10val2 < 0, because then m <
Ensure that numeric.c compiles with other NBASE values.
As noted in the comments, support for different NBASE values is really
only of historical interest, but as long as we're keeping it, we might
as well make sure that it compiles.
Joel Jacobson
Discussion:
the computation in that case.
Joel Jacobson and Dean Rasheed
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/06712c29-98e9-43b3-98da-f234d81c6e49%40app.fastmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0736fc1ceb0659a9f73699910ac56603336daeee
Modified Files
that could be relaxed, by allowing some generated
columns to be skipped for a MERGE without an INSERT action, but it's
not clear that it's worth the effort.
Noticed while investigating bug #17759. Back-patch to v15, where MERGE
was added.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion:
https
that could be relaxed, by allowing some generated
columns to be skipped for a MERGE without an INSERT action, but it's
not clear that it's worth the effort.
Noticed while investigating bug #17759. Back-patch to v15, where MERGE
was added.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Tom Lane.
Discussion:
https
Add non-decimal integer support to type numeric.
This enhances the numeric type input function, adding support for
hexadecimal, octal, and binary integers of any size, up to the limits
of the numeric type.
Since 6fcda9aba8, such non-decimal integers have been accepted by the
parser as integer
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
