Re: [GENERAL] the future of pljava development

2007-05-24 Thread Thomas Hallgren
committers to the PL/Java project? Regards, Thomas Hallgren Marek Lewczuk wrote: Guy Rouillier pisze: Nothing productive will come of a language debate; let's just say there are things you can do with a complete programming language at your disposal that you can't do with PL/pgsql. I use Java

Re: [GENERAL] Invoking java in a trigger

2006-11-03 Thread Thomas Hallgren
David Potts wrote: Is it possible to invoke a computer language other than postgres sql as the result of a trigger firing, eg something like Java. Dave. http://wiki.tada.se/wiki/display/pljava/Home Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast

Re: [GENERAL] performace review

2006-10-22 Thread Thomas Hallgren
for OpenCRX spreading FUD about PostgreSQL? Does anyone know? Kind Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

[GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys

2006-06-28 Thread Thomas Hallgren
using Oracle mapped the UUID to a RAW(16) but PostgreSQL doesn't have that and the BYTEA adds extra overhead. What would be the best (as in most efficient) mapping for a 128 bit primary key? Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9

Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys

2006-06-28 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:01:49AM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote: I'm building an app where I have several entities that are identified using a UUID (i.e. a 128 bit quantity). My current implementation uses a composite primary key consisting of two int8 values

Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys

2006-06-28 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:22:45AM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote: Thanks. That would of course work but at the same time it increases the complexity of my app. Yet another component to install and keep track of. It's also a bit of an overkill since the only thing I

Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys

2006-06-28 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:03:40PM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote: OK. I thought you always had a type descriptor handy when reading the binary representation. I've noticed that the typmod is expected in some receive functions (bpcharrecv and numeric_recv

Re: [GENERAL] create view problem

2006-06-05 Thread Thomas Hallgren
. I don't see CREATE (or any other ddl statement) in that list. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [GENERAL] Java Triggers

2006-06-02 Thread Thomas Hallgren
John, Thanks for the referral. The link is a bit outdated since all web content has moved to a wiki. Please use: http://wiki.tada.se/display/pljava/Home instead. Kind regards, Thomas Hallgren John Sidney-Woollett wrote: I would think the answer is yes. pljava allows you to create java

Re: [GENERAL] background triggers?

2006-05-25 Thread Thomas Hallgren
execute (and complete) within a transaction and the work they perform should be rolled back if the transaction is rolled back. Kind regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire

Re: [GENERAL] background triggers?

2006-05-25 Thread Thomas Hallgren
to the main, attempts the COMMIT but instead and rolls back due to a violated constraint? Where does that leave fork-2? Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [GENERAL] background triggers?

2006-05-25 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Rafal Pietrak wrote: On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 10:33 +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote: Rafal Pietrak wrote: I'd like to propose a 'syntax/semantics' of such trigger: Triggers normally execute inside of a transaction. A COMMIT within a trigger could mean: do a fork: fork-1) return to the main

Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface

2006-05-13 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Joshua D. Drake wrote: BTW who was the EXPERT that slammed java performance? No clue, but java sucks on the desktop :) No it doesn't (unless you mean when tilting your coffee mug. Hmm, no, then you would need something that actually sucks java). Regards, Thomas Hallgren

Re: [GENERAL] GUI Interface

2006-05-13 Thread Thomas Hallgren
. I will not spend time on a war that cannot be fought in this forum. Just wanted to air my opinion this once :-) Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http

Re: [GENERAL] Five reasons why you should never use PostgreSQL -- ever

2006-03-15 Thread Thomas Hallgren
TJ O'Donnell wrote: Slashdot had this today. http://searchopensource.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1172668,00.html Interesting. JDBC is now a 'language'. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't

Re: [GENERAL] Clustered PostgreSQL

2006-03-14 Thread Thomas Hallgren
If you're using JDBC, the C-JDBC (http://c-jdbc.objectweb.org/) might be a good option. Regards, Thomas Hallgren Devrim GUNDUZ wrote: Hi, On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Jojo Paderes wrote: Is it possible to cluster PostgreSQL? If yes where can I find the resource information on how to implement

Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-31 Thread Thomas Hallgren
for ultimate suckiness of the installer ;) I love to install all X11, Java and stuff on a server to be able to install a package with about 1/10 the size ;) How about postponing choice of implementation language until it's clear what it is that should be implemented ;-) Regards, Thomas Hallgren

Re: [GENERAL] New project launched : PostgreSQL GUI

2006-01-31 Thread Thomas Hallgren
my 2 cents :) Bundling Java is a pain, so we'd better stay away from that. There's always gcj. It's pretty mature by now. I'm not sure about availability compared to Python though, but I find it hard to believe it would be more painful. Regards, Thomas Hallgren

Re: [GENERAL] user defined function

2006-01-24 Thread Thomas Hallgren
For what it's worth, the next release of PL/Java has support for both RECORD parameters and SETOF RECORD return types. The adventurous can try out the current CVS HEAD. Regards, Thomas Hallgren Tom Lane wrote: Yl Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I want to implement a UDF that can accept

Re: [GENERAL] FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)

2006-01-19 Thread Thomas Hallgren
and that it has been deleted if it's no longer found. Anyway, my opinion on this, in detail, will be on the ITToolBox blog. You can argue with me there. That will be interesting reading. I didn't find it (yet). Can you please post an URL here? Regards, Thomas Hallgren

Re: [GENERAL] Graphical modelling tool

2005-12-07 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Thank you for all good suggestions. Clay will probably be my choice for this project since it indeed is an Eclipse plugin that is developed. Thanks again, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space

[GENERAL] Graphical modelling tool

2005-12-06 Thread Thomas Hallgren
there? Are there any open source alternatives? Kind regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [GENERAL] Deep integration of PostgreSQL with Apache

2005-05-03 Thread Thomas Hallgren
the integration you ask for is not in anyway possible unless you are content with one single database connection. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [GENERAL] Deep integration of PostgreSQL with Apache

2005-05-03 Thread Thomas Hallgren
to make it happen and I'm not sure you'd gain anything. My advice would be to consider a multi-threaded server that uses a connection pool and perhaps include some shared caching of data that is more static in nature in the middle tier. That could really save some context switches. Regards, Thomas

Re: [GENERAL] Function call identification

2005-05-02 Thread Thomas Hallgren
more blah; END IF: Why not have the callers call the callee with a boolean parameter? Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Re: [GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD

2005-04-28 Thread Thomas Hallgren
) to use a function returning SETOF RECORD. Wouldn't it make sense to be able to define a record in the projection part of a query, similar to what I was attempting with my SELECT? Has this been discussed or is it just considered as not very useful? Regards, Thomas Hallgren

[GENERAL] Functions returning RECORD

2005-04-21 Thread Thomas Hallgren
that query? I.e. where do specify my RECORD definition? Is it possible at all? Ideally I'd like to write something like this: SELECT xyz(a, b) AS (x int, y int, z timestamptz) FROM abc; but that yields a syntax error. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast

Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP vs actual time

2005-04-21 Thread Thomas Hallgren
, thanks for the tip. I guess I'll just stick with timeofday()::timestamp...its more concise anyways... Why use timeofday() at all? Why not now(). It will return a timestamptz without casts. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1

Re: [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP vs actual time

2005-04-21 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Scott Marlowe wrote: I think you missed the first part of the conversation... I sure did. Sorry... Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

[GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD

2005-04-21 Thread Thomas Hallgren
this: SELECT xyz(a, b) AS (x int, y int, z timestamptz) FROM abc; but that yields a syntax error. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.0.2 Now Available

2005-04-15 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Marc G. Fournier wrote: And, for Bittorrent Users, David has put up the tar packages at: http://bt.postgresql.org The windows installer torrent doesn't work. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL and .NET

2005-04-03 Thread Thomas Hallgren
with Java 1.4. As with GNU GCJ, it uses GNU Classpath and is a couple of years behind mainstream Java, both from a functionality and performance standpoint. Still, IKVM is a very interesting project. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL and .NET

2005-04-03 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Pavel Stehule wrote: Hello maybe http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/plmono/projdisplay.php but I am not know more Judging from the CVS, that project hasn't had any activity at all the last 14 months or so. Is it still active? Has it been moved? Regards, Thomas Hallgren

Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?

2005-04-02 Thread Thomas Hallgren
one PL with a validator procedure, which IIRC was your own addition to that API. How come they don't all have validators? For PL/Java, the answer is that we just haven't had the time to implement it. It should be done of course. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end

Re: [GENERAL] question about 8.1 and stored procedures

2005-03-20 Thread Thomas Hallgren
. The above article doesn't mention this at all. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL still for Linux only?

2005-03-11 Thread Thomas Hallgren
with PostgreSQL. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list

Re: [GENERAL] Loading of native libraries in PLJAVA

2005-03-10 Thread Thomas Hallgren
an InputStream for a resource stored in a jar file. The class in question should be in the same package as the resource (i.e. your properties file). Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ

[GENERAL] Help with access check

2005-02-06 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Hi, From code inside a C-function, given the AclId of a user and the Oid of a Schema, what's the most efficient way to find out if the user has been granted CREATE on the schema? Thanks, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner

Re: [GENERAL] Moving from Sybase to PostgreSQL - Stored Procedures

2005-01-29 Thread Thomas Hallgren
run within the transaction that was in effect when the call was issued so your Sybase stored procedures involving several hours of execution must probably be rewritten so that you move the transaction demarcation to a client that issues several more short-lived calls. Regards, Thomas Hallgren

Re: [GENERAL] OID of current function

2005-01-12 Thread Thomas Hallgren
= fcinfo-flinfo-fn_oid; ... } Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [GENERAL] [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 1

2004-12-05 Thread Thomas Hallgren
and start them locally on my machine without problems. This might of course be something in my own setup but I don't have this problem with any other torrents on the net. Anyone else experiencing similar problems? Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast

Re: [GENERAL] Regexp matching: bug or operator error?

2004-11-23 Thread Thomas Hallgren
ahead and finds your '.*'. That in turn consumes all but the last character. Perhaps what you want is '[^0-9]+([0-9]{1,5})[^0-9]+' Translates to at least one non digit followed by 1-5 digits and then at least 1 non digit. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast

Re: [GENERAL] null value of type java.sql.Time

2004-11-22 Thread Thomas Hallgren
no value, hence the different syntax. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based

2004-10-31 Thread Thomas Hallgren
that instead of threads, you want it to be completely event driven. In essence that would mean serving one event per CPU from start to end at any given time. What is an event in this case? Where did it come from? How will this system serve concurrent users? Regards, Thomas Hallgren

Re: [GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based

2004-10-31 Thread Thomas Hallgren
behavior in many cases. - Your scheduler is confined to one CPU and cannot react to the system as a whole. I think it is more important that the scheduler can balance _all_ sessions among _all_ available resources on the machine. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast

Re: [GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based

2004-10-31 Thread Thomas Hallgren
that the scheduler can balance _all_ sessions among _all_ available resources on the machine. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL

Re: [GENERAL] Bug or stupidity

2004-10-30 Thread Thomas Hallgren
be a warning, not a notice. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [GENERAL] Bug or stupidity

2004-10-30 Thread Thomas Hallgren
it would lessen the risk of introducing ambiguities in the parser (and it looks better than repeated FROM's). Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs

[GENERAL] Question regarding the mailing list.

2004-10-29 Thread Thomas Hallgren
similar experiences? What am I doing wrong? Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

Re: [GENERAL] Question regarding the mailing list.

2004-10-29 Thread Thomas Hallgren
to the pgsql-general list. You got at least one of them (since you replied), but the list didn't. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [GENERAL] Question regarding the mailing list.

2004-10-29 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Marc G. Fournier wrote: I'm seeing all of your notes, and am not in the CC either ... You see the posts that doesn't show up in the archives or on the newsgroups ?! If you do, you will see exactly 3 posts on the subject Reasoning behind process instead of thread based that are addressed to Marco.

Re: [GENERAL] Question regarding the mailing list.

2004-10-29 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Hmm, I'm using another SMTP server now that actually informs me when it is unable to deliver. Apparently it bounces intermittently with this message: Your message of Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:08:35 +0200 entitled: Re: [GENERAL] Question regarding the mailing list. could not be delivered to the

Re: [GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based

2004-10-28 Thread Thomas Hallgren
. With respect to my last comment about speed, I guess it's long overdue to kill this thread now. Let's hope the forum stays intact :-) Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http

Re: [GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based

2004-10-28 Thread Thomas Hallgren
of the features that I feel are essential, because it does some things dead wrong, and because it is dual licensed. Hope that cleared up some of the confusion. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet

Re: [GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based

2004-10-28 Thread Thomas Hallgren
(which is not that significant). not that significant all depends on how often you need to switch. On most OS'es, a process switch is significantly slower than switching between threads (again, Linux may be an exception to the rule). Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end

Re: [GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based

2004-10-28 Thread Thomas Hallgren
be slightly heavier but it does a much better job. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [GENERAL] Comment on timezone and interval types

2004-10-27 Thread Thomas Hallgren
will have some negative implications for data exchange. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Re: [GENERAL] Theory

2004-10-27 Thread Thomas Hallgren
. With respect to the IMO very helpful reply you got from Jeff Davis on this topic yesterday, what is it you expect from this list? We won't write an essay for you you know. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all

Re: [GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based

2004-10-27 Thread Thomas Hallgren
overflow and out of memory, but it can be done. So to state that multi-threaded environments in general kills all threads when one thread chrashes is not true. Having said that, I have no clue as to how advanced MySQL is in this respect. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end

Re: [GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based

2004-10-27 Thread Thomas Hallgren
. 6. And lastly, my favorite; a multi-threaded system can be easily integrated with, and make full use of, a multi-threaded virtual execution environment such as a Java VM. ... Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched

Re: [GENERAL] Bug or stupidity

2004-10-27 Thread Thomas Hallgren
of introducing ambiguities in the parser (and it looks better than repeated FROM's). Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Re: [GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based

2004-10-27 Thread Thomas Hallgren
with the robustness of multiple processes... So do I. I've learned to really like PostgreSQL and the way it's built, and as I said in my previous mail, I'm not advocating a switch. I just react to the unfair bashing of multi-threaded systems. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end

Re: [GENERAL] Reasoning behind process instead of thread based

2004-10-27 Thread Thomas Hallgren
kill a number of external processes. Killing the multithreaded process is more like pulling the plug. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's

Re: [GENERAL] Bug or stupidity

2004-10-26 Thread Thomas Hallgren
_why_ they enable it can do so, but I strongly object to having this option enabled by default. I suggest that: 1. Have this option disabled by default. 2. Print WARNING's rather than notifications when tables are added. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast

Re: [GENERAL] Bug or stupidity

2004-10-26 Thread Thomas Hallgren
with yet another syntax? Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [GENERAL] Bug or stupidity

2004-10-25 Thread Thomas Hallgren
magically patched up by the dbms? Ok, so some older installations might break when this is changed but the option is still there. Let applications that depend on this somewhat magical behavior enable it rather than have everyone else potentially run into the same problem as Philip. Regards, Thomas

Re: [GENERAL] Bug or stupidity

2004-10-25 Thread Thomas Hallgren
). I consider that a very *bad* thing. It's perhaps OK that the option exists so that old legacy system can keep on running, but to have it enabled by default is not good at all. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill

[GENERAL] Verifying a user.

2004-10-14 Thread Thomas Hallgren
to do that using SQL? Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [GENERAL] Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions

2004-08-25 Thread Thomas Hallgren
? Is performance ok now :-) This project might be perceived as a thirdparty add-on and thus, fail its purpose. The steering committee must stand behind this officially. Will you? What's your opinion about the suggestion? Any ideas what the project should be named? Regards, Thomas Hallgren

Re: [GENERAL] Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions

2004-08-25 Thread Thomas Hallgren
distribution? No ... The core server distribution is left untouched by all this. It would be really nice if this project could publish packages using your BitTorrent and ftp mirrors though. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9

Re: [GENERAL] Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions

2004-08-24 Thread Thomas Hallgren
current employment however has no connection to PostgreSQL. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Re: [GENERAL] Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions

2004-08-24 Thread Thomas Hallgren
to promote their own product. In so, we need to be coordinated. Preferably by someone from within. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

[GENERAL] ANN: PL/Java now supports both PostgreSQL 8.0 and 7.4

2004-08-23 Thread Thomas Hallgren
supported with Cygwin on Windows). On Linux, PL/Java 1.0.0.b4 includes binary distributions compiled using GCJ (the GNU Java) to take full advantage of Postgres capability of using preloaded modules. Please visit http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/pljava for more info. Regards, Thomas Hallgren

Re: [GENERAL] Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions

2004-08-23 Thread Thomas Hallgren
a better solution to replace the inferior one and to limit the number of overlaps. Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match

[GENERAL] Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions on postgresql (dblink, 2pc, clustering))

2004-08-22 Thread Thomas Hallgren
. It would do PostgreSQL an awful lot of good if there where supported configurations including replication, server side language support (Perl, Tcl, Java, etc.), JDBC and ODCB drivers, and other things that you'd normally find in commercial enterprise solutions. Regards, Thomas Hallgren

Re: [GENERAL] Plperlu and sending emails, is it safe?

2004-06-28 Thread Thomas Hallgren
harmless callback mechanism that can be called with a state enum denoting PreCommit, PostCommit, PostAbort? Kind regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [GENERAL] [OT] Dilemma about OS - Postgres interaction

2004-06-18 Thread Thomas Hallgren
. The latter of course to log the fact that a change has occured (for Commit issued) or to prevent it from happening (all other handlers). I'm sure this functionality is there already. I'd be happy to write a patch if someone could point out where I find it. Kind regards, Thomas Hallgren

Re: [GENERAL] 7.4 windows version?

2004-06-18 Thread Thomas Hallgren
(OMG) would be smiling too if they read your post. I wonder if they ever considered the more divine translation :-) Regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe

[GENERAL] How to tell when postmaster is ready

2004-06-10 Thread Thomas Hallgren
. Is there a proper way to test when the postmaster is ready to receive commands? Kind regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

[GENERAL] News outage?

2004-06-04 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Hi, I have not been able to connect to news.postgresql.org over the last couple of days. I've tried from several locations/computers. Is anyone else having the same problem? Kind regards, Thomas Hallgren ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9