tm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Woodchuck Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The proponent certainly left a bad taste in my mouth after his
little ...
Too much information.
LOL. Get your mind out of the gutter. ;-)
--
Bill
---(end of
Vern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Marc G. Fournier wrote in Msg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
it can't *hurt* to have the group ...
I respectfully disagree with you, Marc. :)
The PGSQL* hierarchy is now well distributed, and there is no need
for a comp.* group. If
Marc G. Fournier wrote in Msg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
it can't *hurt* to have the group ...
I respectfully disagree with you, Marc. :)
The PGSQL* hierarchy is now well distributed, and there is no need for
a comp.* group. If anything, the ungated comp.* group will confuse
newbies into thinking
On Saturday, in article
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert McClenon wrote:
I think that the term that is occasionally used is that the hierarchy
has a hierarchy czar. That is the most straightforward way to manage
a hierarchy. I did not say that it was the best or the
On 3 Dec 2004 20:34:36 GMT, Woodchuck Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:29:40 + (UTC) in news.groups, Marc G.
Fournier From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
The pgsql.* hierarchy is a not a private one, it is a
David Harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:29:40 + (UTC) in news.groups, Marc G.
Fournier From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
The pgsql.* hierarchy is a not a private one, it is a public one
carried by several of the large usenet servers.
What are
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 12/3/2004 3:32 PM, Woodchuck Bill wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joshua D. Drake) wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So the current state of affairs is that we have the gated, official
pgsql.* newsgroups, and the comp.* stuff is not gated in either
direction?
Yes.
Mike Cox wrote:
Jan Wieck wrote:
On 12/3/2004 3:32 PM, Woodchuck Bill wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joshua D. Drake) wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So the current state of affairs is that we have the gated, official
pgsql.* newsgroups, and the comp.* stuff is not gated in either
Marc G. Fournier From: wrote:
Mike Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc G. Fournier From: wrote:
The pgsql.* hierarchy is a not a private one, it is a public one carried
by several of the large usenet servers.
Doesn't private denote a hierarchy in its own domain such as
microsoft.*,
and
Marc G. Fournier From: wrote:
Mike Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
unmoderated group comp.databases.postgresql
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of
the worldwide unmoderated Usenet newsgroup
10 matches
Mail list logo
