Hello,
James wrote:
Regarding a database abstraction package: does Metabase handle all
standard SQL constructs (as opposed to vendor-specific SQL extensions)?
The GUI applications to be ported were built with JAM, which basically
provides an abstraction layer via its JPL language. JPL has
Manuel,
Thanx for the excellent overview of metabase. I will give it a test drive.
A couple further questions, if you have time:
Do you execute meta commands like you do with the other db interface
functions, e.g., odbc_connect(), odbc_select(), etc., or are you able to
encapsulate SQL
James Potts wrote:
Manuel,
Thanx for the excellent overview of metabase. I will give it a test drive.
A couple further questions, if you have time:
Do you execute meta commands like you do with the other db interface
functions, e.g., odbc_connect(), odbc_select(), etc., or are you
Manuel,
Thanx again for your help. I will check it out this evening. Sounds like
you're a busy man. ;-) Keep up the good work.
James Potts
Manuel Lemos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
James Potts wrote:
Manuel,
Thanx for the
I appreciate all your thoughts.
Miles, regarding the price-per-seat issue, it isn't a question of the number
of developers but the number of simultaneous connections to the database.
For example, a 64-user Informix license is over $5,000 ... While I doubt we
will need to maintain persistent
5 matches
Mail list logo
