On 13/06/07, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, June 13, 2007 3:36 am, Robin Vickery wrote:
On 12/06/07, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, June 12, 2007 9:33 am, Tijnema wrote:
I meant reverse order :P
That would be pretty broken.
There's no guarantee that
On 12/06/07, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, June 12, 2007 9:33 am, Tijnema wrote:
I meant reverse order :P
That would be pretty broken.
There's no guarantee that browsers will present the inputs in any
order at all, even though they all seem (so far) to follow the
convention
On 6/13/07, Jake McHenry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been reading along, very informative :) I found Osama within 20 seconds
and as someone posted already, looking for his head wouldn't be much of a
task for a computer.
It's just for if you want to keep normal people out ;)
Has anyone
On Tue, June 12, 2007 10:12 pm, Jake McHenry wrote:
Has anyone tried cracking/hacking what Microsoft has done with the
animal
pictures?
MS is using petfinder.com or whatever it is, as their source to know
what is a cat and a dog
So all you have to do is trick petfinder.com into giving you all
On Wed, June 13, 2007 3:36 am, Robin Vickery wrote:
On 12/06/07, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, June 12, 2007 9:33 am, Tijnema wrote:
I meant reverse order :P
That would be pretty broken.
There's no guarantee that browsers will present the inputs in any
order at all, even
At 6:22 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Server builds up a database of pictures, client does the same with MD5
check, and problem solved...:)
Tijnema
Tijnema:
Not exactly, I don't think you could MD5 this:
http://sperling.com/examples/dot-captcha/
To make variations of the theme. I can
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean the same uncrackable as AACS did:
HD-DVD is uncrackable ;)
As I provided in another post, try cracking this:
At 7:51 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
It would definitly be an interesting challenge, but you don't have
time, or is that an excuse..? :P
What about you tedd?
Tijnema
Eager Beaver, huh?
Good for you!
After you crack my dot-captcha, I'll make up another. :-)
Rob provided an interesting
tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean the same uncrackable as AACS did:
HD-DVD is uncrackable ;)
As I provided in another post, try cracking
At 3:02 PM -0400 6/11/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
OCR is extremely fast. I've done work in the past using OCR and while it
was simple text in documents, the OCR program could extract the text
from the image of a magazine page in about a second. For simplistic
displays of text, or even only slight
At 4:37 PM -0400 6/11/07, Daniel Brown wrote:
I'm going to try to knock out a
proof-of-concept later this week if I can to bring some of it
together.
--
Daniel P. Brown
Daniel et al:
While thinking about proof-of-concepts, think also of optical
illusions -- perhaps there's some
At 12:42 PM +0100 6/12/07, Stut wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean the same uncrackable as AACS did:
HD-DVD is uncrackable ;)
As I
On 6/12/07, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:42 PM +0100 6/12/07, Stut wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean the same uncrackable as AACS
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 07:25 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 6:22 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Server builds up a database of pictures, client does the same with MD5
check, and problem solved...:)
Tijnema
Tijnema:
Not exactly, I don't think you could MD5 this:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 07:29 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean the same uncrackable as AACS did:
HD-DVD is uncrackable ;)
As
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 07:29 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean the same
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 09:05 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 07:29 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 08:01 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 3:02 PM -0400 6/11/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
OCR is extremely fast. I've done work in the past using OCR and while it
was simple text in documents, the OCR program could extract the text
from the image of a magazine page in about a second. For
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 07:29 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean the same uncrackable as AACS did:
HD-DVD is
On 6/12/07, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean the same uncrackable as AACS did:
HD-DVD is uncrackable ;)
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:23 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:09 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 07:29 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:09 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 07:29 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:23 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:46 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:23 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:46 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:23 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:23 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:46 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
Nope, it does actually check for Submit.x and Submit.y ;)
DOH! :)
Cheers,
Rob.
You seem pretty sure about it, what if he
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:23 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:46 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
Nope, it does actually check for Submit.x and Submit.y ;)
DOH! :)
Cheers,
On 10/06/07, Dave M G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PHP General List,
With a little help from the web, and help from this list, I have a
simple CAPTCHA image that works within the content system I'm building.
But it's *really* simple. Basically white text on a black background,
with a couple of
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:33 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:23 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:46 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
Nope, it does actually
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:35 +0100, Robin Vickery wrote:
On 10/06/07, Dave M G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PHP General List,
With a little help from the web, and help from this list, I have a
simple CAPTCHA image that works within the content system I'm building.
But it's *really* simple.
This is another intersting example of CAPTCHA, from - Carnegie Mellon
University:
http://recaptcha.net/
--
zerof
http://www.educar.pro.br/
Apache - PHP - MySQL - Boolean Logics - Project Management
--
Você deve, sempre, consultar uma
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:53 -0300, zerof wrote:
This is another intersting example of CAPTCHA, from - Carnegie Mellon
University:
http://recaptcha.net/
That's a pretty cool idea... doesn't necessarily improve CAPTCHA per se,
but it does give it some usefulness beyond preventing spam.
At 2:12 PM +0100 6/12/07, Stut wrote:
The submit image is bigger than the circle, and I'm guessing Tedd is
checking the coords passed through.
-Stut
Yes, that's all the technique does for now. It just checks the submit
x and submit y and determines if those coordinates lie within the
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:49 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 2:12 PM +0100 6/12/07, Stut wrote:
The submit image is bigger than the circle, and I'm guessing Tedd is
checking the coords passed through.
-Stut
Yes, that's all the technique does for now. It just checks the submit
x and submit y and
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:56 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:49 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 2:12 PM +0100 6/12/07, Stut wrote:
The submit image is bigger than the circle, and I'm guessing Tedd is
checking the coords passed through.
-Stut
Yes, that's all the
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:01 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:56 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
(1 * 100) / 100 = .10 = 10% of the time
Bad math alert... (1 * 100) / 100 = 10;)
Still the same answer though, was just mixing what I wrote with
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:01 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:56 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
(1 * 100) / 100 = .10 = 10% of the time
Bad math alert... (1 * 100) / 100 = 10;)
Still the
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:19 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:01 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:56 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
(1 * 100) / 100 = .10 = 10% of the time
Bad
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:19 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:01 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:56 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 19:23 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:19 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:01 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 19:23 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:19 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:01
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 19:34 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 19:23 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:19 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings
-Original Message-
From: Tijnema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1:34 PM
To: Robert Cummings
Cc: tedd; Stut; Jim Lucas; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Going from simple to super CAPTCHA
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 19:34 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 19:23 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:19
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:06 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
Okay, here's something I whipped up today:
http://pilotpig.com/captcha/index.php
Works pretty well, but keep in mind that it's in the very early
stages. I randomized the position and size to assist in throwing off
Turing
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:06 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
Okay, here's something I whipped up today:
http://pilotpig.com/captcha/index.php
Works pretty well, but keep in mind that it's in the very early
stages. I randomized
On Tue, June 12, 2007 6:25 am, tedd wrote:
At 6:22 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Server builds up a database of pictures, client does the same with
MD5
check, and problem solved...:)
Tijnema
Tijnema:
Not exactly, I don't think you could MD5 this:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 21:46 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:06 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
Okay, here's something I whipped up today:
http://pilotpig.com/captcha/index.php
Works pretty well, but
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 21:46 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:06 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
Okay, here's something I whipped up today:
On Tue, June 12, 2007 6:42 am, Stut wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean the same uncrackable as AACS did:
HD-DVD is uncrackable ;)
On 6/12/07, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, June 12, 2007 6:42 am, Stut wrote:
tedd wrote:
At 7:38 PM +0200 6/11/07, Tijnema wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean the
On Tue, June 12, 2007 6:41 am, tedd wrote:
If my dot-captcha holds up against Tijnema, we could think of various
ways to combine both.
E.
Now that I've looked at the source, how do you stop:
?php
posttohost('http://sperling.com', '/examples/dot-captcha/index.php',
On Tue, June 12, 2007 9:33 am, Tijnema wrote:
I meant reverse order :P
That would be pretty broken.
There's no guarantee that browsers will present the inputs in any
order at all, even though they all seem (so far) to follow the
convention of presenting them in the order they appear in the
On 6/12/07, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, June 12, 2007 9:33 am, Tijnema wrote:
I meant reverse order :P
That would be pretty broken.
First, you should;ve seen this as a joke that replies to the previous messages.
There's no guarantee that browsers will present the inputs
On Tue, June 12, 2007 3:40 pm, Tijnema wrote:
A PFP (Pixel-For-Pixel) Approach would do the job, but I don't think
there exists software yet for it. I would have to get the file format
of the bitmap you're using (PNG I Guess), and then parse it PFP.
Oh, the software exists.
On 6/12/07, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, June 12, 2007 3:40 pm, Tijnema wrote:
A PFP (Pixel-For-Pixel) Approach would do the job, but I don't think
there exists software yet for it. I would have to get the file format
of the bitmap you're using (PNG I Guess), and then parse
On Tue, June 12, 2007 7:01 am, tedd wrote:
I was thinking about this the other day -- computers are fast and
people are generally slow. So, instead of making the time short,
examine how fast the answer was obtained. Immediate = computer;
delayed = human.
Even an easy LETTER CAPTCHA takes
On Tue, June 12, 2007 10:49 am, tedd wrote:
Now, how is a bot going to figure that out?
The bot doesn't figure any damn thing out.
A human figures it out, and programs the bot to do it.
If you're just fighting a bot, any captcha will work.
If you're fighting an actual human, any captcha can be
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:05 -0500, Richard Lynch wrote:
On Tue, June 12, 2007 7:01 am, tedd wrote:
I was thinking about this the other day -- computers are fast and
people are generally slow. So, instead of making the time short,
examine how fast the answer was obtained. Immediate =
On Tue, June 12, 2007 2:06 pm, Daniel Brown wrote:
Okay, here's something I whipped up today:
http://pilotpig.com/captcha/index.php
Works pretty well, but keep in mind that it's in the very early
stages. I randomized the position and size to assist in throwing off
Turing
On Tue, June 12, 2007 7:18 am, tedd wrote:
At 4:37 PM -0400 6/11/07, Daniel Brown wrote:
I'm going to try to knock out a
proof-of-concept later this week if I can to bring some of it
together.
--
Daniel P. Brown
Daniel et al:
While thinking about proof-of-concepts, think also of optical
At 6:19 PM +0200 6/12/07, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:01 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:56 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
(1 * 100) / 100 = .10 = 10% of the time
Bad math alert...
http://shorl.com/nomojeryprafri
Cheers,
Rob.
Hmm, LOL
Ok, found him ;) He's under the ground ... :P
Heheh, nah, not this time... he's in one of the bumper cars :)
Cheers,
Rob.
That would have kept me out. I must have spent ten minutes looking at
that thing and I did not
At 4:33 PM -0500 6/12/07, Richard Lynch wrote:
!!!The remainder is NOT directed to any one specific person!!!
Perhaps we should consider a moratorium on posts about CAPTCHA, or
some kind of limitation here...
It's getting old fast...
Perhaps only allow actual implementations and actual cracks
At 12:29 PM -0400 6/12/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:19 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:01 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:56 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
: Re: [PHP] Going from simple to super CAPTCHA
At 12:29 PM -0400 6/12/07, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:19 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/12/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:01 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:56
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 23:12 -0400, Jake McHenry wrote:
I've been reading along, very informative :) I found Osama within 20 seconds
and as someone posted already, looking for his head wouldn't be much of a
task for a computer.
Has anyone tried cracking/hacking what Microsoft has done with
On 6/10/07, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tedd:
Please don't spread the code of your Audio CAPTCHA, we had a big
discussion about it, and we concluded that it was quite easy to crack.
I remember i've cracked some other CAPTCHAs, but if you still think
your Audio CAPTCHA isn't hard to crack,
On 6/11/07, Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/10/07, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tedd:
Please don't spread the code of your Audio CAPTCHA, we had a big
discussion about it, and we concluded that it was quite easy to crack.
I remember i've cracked some other CAPTCHAs, but if you still
On 6/11/07, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/11/07, Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/10/07, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tedd:
Please don't spread the code of your Audio CAPTCHA, we had a big
discussion about it, and we concluded that it was quite easy to crack.
I
Gnag:
I know we can beat this thing to death, as we have in previous
threads and I don't anyone wants to travel previously traveled ground.
However, Rob said:
A good captcha will try to exploit a computer's weaknesses.
So, let's expound on that -- what do you consider to be a computer's
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:38 -0400, tedd wrote:
Gnag:
I know we can beat this thing to death, as we have in previous
threads and I don't anyone wants to travel previously traveled ground.
However, Rob said:
A good captcha will try to exploit a computer's weaknesses.
So, let's expound
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 12:01 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:38 -0400, tedd wrote:
Gnag:
I know we can beat this thing to death, as we have in previous
threads and I don't anyone wants to travel previously traveled ground.
However, Rob said:
A good
On Jun 11, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
What did you hear ringing?
Possible answers... a bell, the telephone, an alarm, etc.
The problem then becomes an issue of people who can't spell or are
terrible at recognizing everyday things.
To combat that, wouldn't you be able
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 12:01 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:38 -0400, tedd wrote:
Gnag:
I know we can beat this thing to death, as we have in previous
threads and I don't anyone wants to travel previously
On 6/11/07, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 12:01 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:38 -0400, tedd wrote:
Gnag:
I know we can beat this thing to death, as we have in previous
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:38 -0400, tedd wrote:
Gnag:
I know we can beat this thing to death, as we have in previous
threads and I don't anyone wants to travel previously traveled ground.
However, Rob said:
A good captcha will try to
On 6/11/07, Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:38 -0400, tedd wrote:
Gnag:
I know we can beat this thing to death, as we have in previous
threads and I don't anyone wants to travel previously traveled ground.
Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:38 -0400, tedd wrote:
Gnag:
I know we can beat this thing to death, as we have in previous
threads and I don't anyone wants to travel previously traveled ground.
However, Rob said:
A good
On 6/11/07, Jim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:38 -0400, tedd wrote:
Gnag:
I know we can beat this thing to death, as we have in previous
threads and I don't anyone wants to travel previously
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 00:22, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:38 -0400, tedd wrote:
[snip]
Tijnema, Daniel Brown, and any other guilty ones, please trim your posts!
--
Crayon
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To
Nah, that's what we have you for! ;-P
Just for that, I'm top-posting, too.
Gotta' love Mondays
On 6/11/07, Crayon Shin Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 00:22, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 10:38
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 18:57 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Jim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not if you are morphing/changing the image each page load.
snip
remember, change height, width, color depth, plus
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 18:57 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Jim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not if you are morphing/changing the image each page load.
snip
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 13:29 -0400, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 18:57 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Jim Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not if you are morphing/changing the image each page
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 19:38 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean the same uncrackable as AACS did:
HD-DVD is
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 19:38 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see if I can crack it ;)
Tijnema
* I hope you don't mean
Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following lore:
Convert image to fixed width + fixed height + default depth, then do
some work on it :P
Tijnema
Yeah, what work? Best of luck with getting a system to reliably
translate one Jell-o blob of an image into another accurately and
reliably.
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 19:51 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 19:38 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if you think this is the uncrackable* solution, create it and
i'll see
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 13:52 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following lore:
Convert image to fixed width + fixed height + default depth, then do
some work on it :P
To be a bit easier, I whipped up a quick example on the web. It's
just static images, not
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 13:52 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following lore:
Convert image to fixed width + fixed height + default depth, then do
some work on it :P
To be a bit easier, I whipped up a
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 13:59 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 13:52 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following lore:
Convert image to fixed width + fixed height + default depth, then do
The (things I thought were subtle) jokes aside, hopefully the
examples can be used as some kind of point-of-reference for those who
may follow along in the future. When they Google for a solution like
the one we're discussing and the words of this motley crew come up as
one of the first
On 6/11/07, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following lore:
Convert image to fixed width + fixed height + default depth, then do
some work on it :P
Tijnema
Yeah, what work? Best of luck with getting a system to reliably
translate one Jell-o
To be a bit easier, I whipped up a quick example on the web. It's
just static images, not a working system, but you'll see what we're
getting at here:
http://pilotpig.net/captcha-example.php
You could even use a color check here to see which color matches the best ;)
Tijnema
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 14:29 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
To be a bit easier, I whipped up a quick example on the web. It's
just static images, not a working system, but you'll see what we're
getting at here:
http://pilotpig.net/captcha-example.php
You could even use a
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 14:29 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
To be a bit easier, I whipped up a quick example on the web. It's
just static images, not a working system, but you'll see what we're
getting at here:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 20:47 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 14:29 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
To be a bit easier, I whipped up a quick example on the web. It's
just static images, not a working system, but you'll see
On 6/11/07, Tijnema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/11/07, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 14:29 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
To be a bit easier, I whipped up a quick example on the web. It's
just static images, not a working system, but you'll see what
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
