Am 2008-05-28 08:40:09, schrieb Philip Thompson:
It's amazing how someone so involved in security would provide any of
this information. Name, job, location, phone numbers, Internet
contact. You might as well have given the name of your children as
well. Nevermind, I'll go find that out
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 2008-05-28 08:40:09, schrieb Philip Thompson:
It's amazing how someone so involved in security would provide any of
this information. Name, job, location, phone numbers, Internet
contact. You might as well have given the name of your
At 8:31 PM +0200 5/28/08, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I have customers in Iran, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Moroco, Germany and
Swiss.
Sounds like a sandwich. :-)
Cheers,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
--
PHP General Mailing List
On May 24, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
What a endless boring off topic thread...
I'm wondering if some day this one will finish and we will talk about
serious and relevant stuffs.
Some of you will tell me to simply don't read the thread... but what is
making me seek is the fact of this message always appear on top my email
list!
Ok,
tedd wrote:
At 3:11 PM -0400 5/12/08, Eric Butera wrote:
NoScript is a FireFox extension to protect users from malicious
scripts.
NoScript is also a tag for browsers to read and react to IF they do not
accept javascript.
http://www.w3schools.com/TAGS/tag_noscript.asp
That's an
On 13 May 2008, at 09:04, Peter Ford wrote:
I think the onus is on the coders of Urchin to document how to avoid
errors when Javascript is disabled, not the site developer who uses
it.
Just to repeat a point I made yesterday which was clearly either
misunderstood or ignored... Urchin
2008/5/13 Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 13 May 2008, at 09:04, Peter Ford wrote:
I think the onus is on the coders of Urchin to document how to avoid
errors when Javascript is disabled, not the site developer who uses it.
Just to repeat a point I made yesterday which was clearly either
On 13 May 2008, at 10:32, Robin Vickery wrote:
2008/5/13 Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 13 May 2008, at 09:04, Peter Ford wrote:
I think the onus is on the coders of Urchin to document how to avoid
errors when Javascript is disabled, not the site developer who uses
it.
Just to repeat a
2008/5/13 Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 13 May 2008, at 10:32, Robin Vickery wrote:
2008/5/13 Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 13 May 2008, at 09:04, Peter Ford wrote:
I think the onus is on the coders of Urchin to document how to avoid
errors when Javascript is disabled, not the
At 9:04 AM +0100 5/13/08, Peter Ford wrote:
I don't expect anyone to second-guess pet peeves :)
Why not? That's the way things change.
I still haven't had anyone address the concerns I posted. Instead, I
feel like a kid watching two others play a game of keep-a-way with
me in the middle.
Stut wrote:
On 12 May 2008, at 09:39, Peter Ford wrote:
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
This is what I did this morning:
http://webbytedd.com/bb/tribute/
It speaks for itself.
Cheers,
tedd
tedd,
Nothing to do with the subject matter, but I noticed because it is one
of your more simple pages: I get a
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Shawn McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My main pet peeve is when my wife leaves empty clothes hangers on door
knobs throughout the house.
Mine is when the pre-wife leaves her clothes on. So we're pretty similar.
--
/Daniel P. Brown
Dedicated Servers
At 11:01 AM -0400 5/13/08, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Shawn McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My main pet peeve is when my wife leaves empty clothes hangers on door
knobs throughout the house.
Mine is when the pre-wife leaves her clothes on. So we're
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 13 de maio de 2008 15:03
Para: php-general@lists.php.net
Assunto: Re: [PHP] Re: A Little Something.
At 11:01 AM -0400 5/13/08, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Shawn McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My main pet peeve is when my
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 15:22 -0300, Thiago Pojda wrote:
Our neighbors all thought I had lost my mind
If they only knew you lost it long ago... ;)
Atenciosamente,
www.softpartech.com.br
I tried to hear your website... my screen reader had a lot of trouble :|
;)
Cheers,
Rob.
--
PROTECTED]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 13 de maio de 2008 15:51
Para: Thiago Pojda
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Assunto: Re: RES: [PHP] Re: A Little Something.
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 15:22 -0300, Thiago Pojda wrote:
Our neighbors all thought I had lost my mind
If they only knew you lost it long ago
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
This is what I did this morning:
http://webbytedd.com/bb/tribute/
It speaks for itself.
Cheers,
tedd
tedd,
Nothing to do with the subject matter, but I noticed because it is one of your
more simple pages: I get a JS urchinTracker() not defined error on your site,
On 12 May 2008, at 09:39, Peter Ford wrote:
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
This is what I did this morning:
http://webbytedd.com/bb/tribute/
It speaks for itself.
Cheers,
tedd
tedd,
Nothing to do with the subject matter, but I noticed because it is
one of your more simple pages: I get a JS
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Stut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 May 2008, at 09:39, Peter Ford wrote:
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
This is what I did this morning:
http://webbytedd.com/bb/tribute/
It speaks for itself.
Cheers,
tedd
tedd,
Nothing to do with the
Stut wrote:
On 12 May 2008, at 09:39, Peter Ford wrote:
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
This is what I did this morning:
http://webbytedd.com/bb/tribute/
It speaks for itself.
Cheers,
tedd
tedd,
Nothing to do with the subject matter, but I noticed because it is one
of your more simple pages: I get a
This is a bit off-topic, but since Peter appears to have missed the
point of my post I feel I must reply. It may also be interesting to
the list.
On 12 May 2008, at 14:43, Peter Ford wrote:
Stut wrote:
On 12 May 2008, at 09:39, Peter Ford wrote:
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
This is what I did
Gentlemen:
First, my apologies for publishing the page without checking it first
for pet-peeves.
Second, please educate me as to the statement that NoScript is
blocking UrchinTracker. Where do I have declared NoScript and why
would I want it? I have numerous sites and they all generate
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:57 PM, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentlemen:
First, my apologies for publishing the page without checking it first for
pet-peeves.
Second, please educate me as to the statement that NoScript is blocking
UrchinTracker. Where do I have declared NoScript and why
At 3:11 PM -0400 5/12/08, Eric Butera wrote:
NoScript is a FireFox extension to protect users from malicious
scripts.
NoScript is also a tag for browsers to read and react to IF they do
not accept javascript.
http://www.w3schools.com/TAGS/tag_noscript.asp
That's an unfortunate naming
25 matches
Mail list logo
